Food Allergy Support is now on Twitter. Follow us @FASupport. You may also follow our Tweets in our new global footer at the bottom of the page here at FAS!

Author Topic: Valentine's -2017  (Read 902 times)

Description:

Offline SilverLining

  • Member
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,466
Valentine's -2017
« on: February 03, 2017, 11:23:54 PM »
Found some safe valentines candy at Walmart.

Great Value (Walmart store brand) has some chocolate hearts, chocolate heats with caramel, and chocolate hearts with cherry.

I found these in Canada, not sure if they are in US or not.

Also found Arvisais. They have a cute purse shaped box with chocolate purse things in it. Company is in Quebec so probably only sold in Canada.
Truly, it should be no problem to delay. Republicans completely blocked the nomination of a highly qualified candidate for a year and a half. They wouldn’t even consider him. It was more than rude—it was an abdication of duty.

So why the rush here? ~~MC

Offline SilverLining

  • Member
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,466
Re: Valentine's -2017
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2017, 11:25:10 PM »
They also had small boxes of Sweet Notes by Rito. (candy hearts with little messages on them)
Truly, it should be no problem to delay. Republicans completely blocked the nomination of a highly qualified candidate for a year and a half. They wouldn’t even consider him. It was more than rude—it was an abdication of duty.

So why the rush here? ~~MC

Offline MaryM

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,129
Re: Valentine's -2017
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2017, 07:19:12 AM »
I got my DD lip gloss from Kiss Freely - it came with 3 and they look like large conversation hearts. They are top 8 free!  She is so excited.

Offline SilverLining

  • Member
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,466
Re: Valentine's -2017
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2018, 06:23:51 PM »
Has anyone seen Rito notes or conversation hearts this year? I can’t f8nd them anywhere.
Truly, it should be no problem to delay. Republicans completely blocked the nomination of a highly qualified candidate for a year and a half. They wouldn’t even consider him. It was more than rude—it was an abdication of duty.

So why the rush here? ~~MC