Well, the article is fairly accurate right up to this point....
But it is also sure to lead to all sorts of serious side effects, including the deadly nerve disease Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GSB), which is listed on the shot as a potential side effect.
Emphasis mine. Yellow journalism, anyone?
ALL flu vaccines are "genetically modified." By definition.
If they weren't, they wouldn't be "vaccines" so much as...
er--
biological warfare agents. KWIM?
This is true of all vaccines, period. It's also true of all cultivated crops-- so it's not "GMO" that these people are objecting to inherently... it's the
methods. Well, they often argue that there is "no way" that nature could put a fish gene into a caterpillar virus, (just for example)... but my answer to that is the
Shawshank Redemption. "Pressure.... and time." That's how genetic selection works, and it's
always working-- sometimes it's deliberate (plant breeding, molecular biology) and sometimes it is natural (flu virus recombination and evolution).
Not clear to me WHY GBS was mentioned at all, actually... well, that isn't true. <sigh> It was mentioned as a scare tactic. But the science behind that one pretty much discredits the ENTIRE remainder of the article.
By the way, GBS is a VERY rare side effect (?) of
natural infectious disease, too, and this is actually by far the more common correlation. Note that I say "correlation" since a causative link has
never been demonstrated with pretty much anything. It's possible that all of those putative causes are unrelated to anything-- maybe GBS is like MS or something, perhaps it's an unidentified pathogen in and of itself... nobody really knows for sure.
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/gbs/gbs.htm