login
FAS has upgraded our forum security. Some members may need to log in again. If you are unable to remember your login information, please email food.allergy.supt@flash.net and we will help you get back in. Thanks for your patience!


Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Please spell spammer backwards:
Spell the answer to 6 + 7 =:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

By posting you acknowledge you are subject to our TOS, rules, and guidelines .


Topic Summary

Posted by: spacecanada
« on: May 22, 2015, 08:25:22 PM »

I am not surprised.

Why haven't cautionary labels become mandatory yet?
Posted by: Macabre
« on: May 22, 2015, 07:32:29 AM »

Wow.
Posted by: LinksEtc
« on: May 21, 2015, 06:00:16 PM »

"FDA Study Finds Milk in Most Dark Chocolate, No Matter What Label Says"
http://community.kidswithfoodallergies.org/blog/fda-study-finds-milk-in-most-dark-chocolate-no-matter-what-label-says

Quote
You shouldn’t assume that dark chocolate contains no milk if the label does not mention it at all. “Milk-allergic consumers should be aware that 33% of the dark chocolates with no mention of milk anywhere on the label were, in fact, found to contain milk,” says Luccioli.