Posted by: CMdeux
« on: July 08, 2017, 01:51:20 AM »
I'm assuming that this is an allergist that you've had for quite some time, then?
I guess a lot depends upon your son's history with egg-- but-- it's my understanding that pushing on the tolerance once there is SOME tolerance via a baked egg challenge (not really "can this person eat normally prepared, eggy foods..." but more like "what can this person tolerate WELL with pretty much complete safety?") then that dose can be regularly, safely administered pretty much daily... and THAT can cause the tolerance to permanently shift in the direction we all want (that is, little to no risk from xc, and maybe, maybe, maybe the ability to even "outgrow" the way that most people think about it).
Seriously-- avoidance only works for preventing reactions. It darned sure doesn't help with outgrowing or improving tolerance.
And yeah, I hear ya on not sending your kid to college with a LTFA to egg or milk. {shudders}
Anyway. My 0,02 is that some allergists take the attitude that there isn't a great OIT protocol out there for people with anaphylaxis hx-- well, maybe there is, and maybe there isn't, but we sure (still) don't know who can do such a protocol successfully and who can't. Still. What IS known is that very low-dose immunotherapy done over a very long time (years) DOES work, and it's really safe. SLIT, for example, has been used this way in Europe for a long time (decades).
There is just one place in the US doing SLIT for food allergens to my knowledge. It is in LaCrosse WI. Some allergists will do OIT protocols-- but do understand that these are definitely not risk-free, though most have a decent to great safety record.
On the other hand, the school of allergists from Mount Sinai training tend to take the view that there is a lot which is unknown about this-- that is, how tolerance does/doesn't become established, etc. They tend to view challenges as less black-and-white-- more of a matter of establishing that the specific parameters of the challenge may have been below a threshold dose-- or not.
It sounds, certainly, as though your son's challenge pushed him over that threshold. But it also sounds as though it might just have been a matter of a dose that was just too, too much. Maybe half that much egg.... or half the concentration... or a quarter of it would have been okay?
Hard to know. What WAS the challenge, if you don;t mind saying? That might give me some idea whether I think your allergist is being too conservative, or just being black-and-white in his/her thinking.
But this is how we managed to basically home-brew at-home-OIT for egg that went on for five long years. We never pushed the dose too high. The most we ever did was about 180, 200 mg a day, in a tiny serving of VERY overcooked brownies. For the first two years, I think DD ate less than a dozen eggs. No-- total. I made brownies for her doses, and made double batches which I weighed, cut up, and froze in batches for those daily doses-- starting with 1/90th of an egg. Yes, well-cooked.
For years, if we tried to push the dose higher than ~200mg, or if there was other stuff happening (like living with a dog she became allergic to, etc.) then her tolerance would drop, and she's get the itchy mouth, stomachaches, etc. again. We'd back the dose down a bit for a week or two... but it was like clockwork; every day, she did that dose.
At the end of that, however, she was apparently no longer allergic and passed an open challenge, NO problem. For real. The way that I tested this was the way that some of the OIT protocols have been set up-- at the end of each year of dosing, we'd try having her go off of those doses for a few weeks, then "rechallenge" by having her do that regular dose. If she had any symptoms at all, then we knew that her tolerance wasn't stable, see-- she needed the daily dosing to MAINTAIN it.
We waited until she could be off of that daily dose for months before we tried seeing what her tolerance was actually like with another challenge (which she passed).
My daughter EATS EGGS.
I'm not saying that anyone should do this without their allergist being a partner-- obviously NOT. Just that having an allergist who wasn't looking for "pass-- or fail?" when DD challenged baked egg-- that was what set this up for success in the long run, I think. We didn't try to take the dose too high initially. We were also pretty cautious because of DD's history, which included pretty convincing anaphylaxis from traces of egg. She has a history of unstable eliciting/threshold doses for her food allergens, and she's asthmatic. All of this meant that she was not likely a good OIT candidate-- but maybe a good SLIT one instead. So that was the approach we took.
DD18 still has to be careful how MUCH egg she gets in a 2-3 day window, just like she does with milk. However, we no longer WORRY about the allergen, and as you know, that is huge.