Mediation is an option-- but both parties have to agree to it.
It can be a diversion step in either an OCR complaint or in due process proceedings.
But, as Ark notes-- it's non-binding anyway. Go figure.
(Which may explain why so few parents opt for mediation.)
Hmmm, lots of loop holes to "get out" of educating the disabled. So not right.
Oh, it's not a loophole at all. I think it's an act of mercy. I think it's
wise.
a school can't "get out" of anything with it. It's entirely optional and voluntary. Even if a school wants to go to mediation, a parent can steamroll right to due process.
You can go to due process if agreement can't be met in mediation. (from what I understand) <shrug>
I have good things to say about the mediation process.
Number one being it showed good faith on both sides.
Two being it preserved the relationship between the districtl and my
child, as well as that between us and the district.
Three, it was a whole hell of a lot faster, less stigmatized, and operated on the premise that we are not adversaries (which, imho, contributes to more generous, cooperative attitudes on both sides.)
I've yet to read any due process hearing that didn't indicate both sides needed some degree of cooperation, and concession.
Mediation, again, imho, is a much better canvas for such.
The school followed through on four very truly
important (due process worthy) points (big deals, all four of them), but did renig on what was probably the most emotional point of contention (Hot Junk Food Day), and which was in direct opposition to their wellness
guidelines.
I will add, however, it is being remodelled, and probably in a more realistic fashion than I anticipated. Probably to the preservation of my child's relationship in the community and not being known as "the child of the Mom who stole Hot Junk Food Day".
I almost believe they went back on their word for my own good (and the good of my child).
<shrug>
FWIW. It's a whole lot of time, and a good deal of self analysis that has brought me to this point in my journey.