I do think that FAHF-2 is a "cure" for anaphylactic responses to allergens. That one really seems to re-regulate the immune response.
On the other hand, the question that my family has wondered at with this particular treatment is an uneasy...
yeah, but in TRADE FOR WHAT?? I mean, the problem is that without knowing anything about the underlying mechanism by which it affects change, it could be that patients who opt for that treatment are trading anaphylaxis vulnerability for... I dunno, liver cancer. Or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Or infertility. Or something else like atypical ALS.
Such things do
not always show up under examination of ethnobotanical uses of a traditional remedy in Ayurvedic or TCM practices because diagnostic
tools and terminology are so culturally specific-- and, to be blunt, life expectancies and medical care in some regions has been so very poor up until quite recently.
Do I think that a "cure" is five years away? Not on your life.
Ten? Maybe. For some people... or at least we'll have the impression that they can be "cured" but maybe we still won't even be able to say with certainty what we mean by using the term.
In my DD's lifetime? I hope so. But I wouldn't bet on it. I wish that I could say otherwise. I suspect that research is at least a DECADE away from even fully understanding how food anaphylaxis works from start-to-finish, and after that, how sensitization happens. Only then can we really start to untangle how
true tolerance might happen, and only THEN can people who
have sensitized hope to regain "normal" immune response to allergens via a true re-training of the immune system. Up to that point, everything is going to be experimental and empirical tinkering with a big black box that says "food allergy" on the side. It's like reaching your hand into a box with a complex electronic device housed within, jumbling some things about, and saying, "Well, let's see if that does the trick!" It may work some of the time, but it's probably not a good approach.