And again, wouldn't they be better off working with FARE to get the laws changed in their state so that insurance would have to cover the formula or working even with current laws and their allergist to get the formula covered? This must have cost start up money to do. I would think that money would have been better spent to get formula coverage. (which is a huge, important issue.) OK, that's assuming the story is true.
The family of this child is saying Nutricia made a change to the formula to which they are not admitting. The child suddenly was unable to tolerate the formula after a label-only change (according to the company). The family is trying to buy up old formula made before the supposed change. They are apparently not insured for the formula, but this goes beyond insurance because they need it all right now.
I really don't know what to think about all of this. The mother says there are 15? other families who are also affected by this. However...we all know from experience that families can be totally convinced of something because of the internet that is also totally wrong. There's a kind of mass hysteria that can happen with all this.
It's possible this little boy had a coincidental change in his condition right at the time the labeling changed. It's possible (I suppose, although I don't see how) that the formula changed and the company either doesn't know it or doesn't want to admit to it. I think that's REALLY unlikely...but then, I tend to support authority. These situations always seems to be a touchstone for whether you support authority or believe The Man is out to get you. It's just easier for some people to believe in a big cover-up conspiracy from this company that's killing kids in order to save money.
I'm really sorry for the family and I believe their child has a real medical issue, but I guess I just don't believe in the connection between the formula change and their son's condition. I also keep hoping this mother will record in her blog
what actually happened at the Mayo Clinic. They were apparently trialing the new formula there under controlled conditions, so what was the outcome? If the child is able to actually tolerate the supposedly-new formula, what does that mean with regard to all the previous donations?
I guess I'm just a heartless be-yatch because I don't buy it all. But then...I don't give money to those late night commercials for sad puppies either.