Food Allergy Support

Discussion Boards => Schools and Food Allergies => Topic started by: CMdeux on February 15, 2012, 03:32:44 PM

FAS has upgraded our forum security. Some members may need to log in again. If you are unable to remember your login information, please email food.allergy.supt@flash.net and we will help you get back in. Thanks for your patience!

Title: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 15, 2012, 03:32:44 PM
Obese children outgrowing school furniture.


I'm so appalled by this that I'm virtually speechless.  Firstly, how can schools possibly not see the obvious-- that the longer they keep chucking cupcakes and candy at kids, THE FATTER THEIR STUDENTS ARE GETTING??


Secondly, why is it that

Quote
Being set apart from peers by sitting in a different chair means "their peers recognize them as large, different," said Dr. Phil Wu, a pediatrician who leads Kaiser Permanente's pediatric obesity prevention and treatment effort.

"At all ages, kids don't want to feel different," Wu said. "They get ostracized by the peers in subtle and not-so-subtle ways. It's more of that social psychological impact that's insidious in a way that's more profound than what the child might experience than sitting in a standard seat."



It's not okay for a kid whose own CHOICES (mostly) have placed them in that position to feel "unhappy" and "excluded" by peers...
No, that would be WRONG, since it would by pschologically harmful to do that to a child...


but it's just fine and dandy for food allergic children (whose own behavior DOES NOT lead to their circumstances) to be systematically excluded and ridiculed by activities which are mostly not even educationally relevant to START with??!!?

WOW.  Irony, much? I mean, this is freaking surreal. The amount of cognitive dissonance needed to do this particular sleight-of-hand on the part of educators is truly... mind-boggling in scope.

Maybe if you are morbidly obese... you should feel a bit motivated to do something to change that, yes?  That's not the same thing as being hobbled by rhuematoid arthritis, struggling with a learning disability, or being legally blind.

If schools were routinely contributing to any of those latter three conditions, there would be a tremendous public outcry DEMANDING that it cease.   Obesity?  Not so much, apparently.   :insane:  Apparently kids should just "say no" to cupcakes if they are already eating too much and moving too little.  Heaven forbid that Mrs. Feelgood, the junk-food pusher masquerading as an over-the-top class mom or teacher, should be told "stop it" for ANY reason...  or that instead of food, we encouraged physical activity in kids as a reward.   :bonking:

I just have to wonder where the disconnect is for educators in this country.  It's disgusting on so many levels that it's hard to even articulate.   :disappointed:

 
 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: YouKnowWho on February 15, 2012, 03:47:19 PM
Haven't you heard?  Food in schools does not make kids fat, duh.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 15, 2012, 04:40:26 PM
I might buy into those studies a lot better if the WHOLE school environment were looked at systematically.

Because I don't think that the ultimate problem is that kids are buying doritos from vending machines rather than eating apples during lunchtime.

-- and that is what those studies all seem to focus on.  Either that or a lack of PE and recess; now, agreed, this is a problem, but the fact remains that most people simply can't EXERCISE their to a healthy weight while routinely scarfing down 700-1200 extra calories daily in empty calories.

GGA, there is an elephant in the room, and they keep looking for mice in corners or making statements about "structural flaws" in the subflooring.... 

How many extra calories are getting shoveled at kids in the AVERAGE classroom during an AVERAGE month...  that parents don't even know about, that researchers aren't learning about because they don't get officially tallied ANYWHERE??   How many calories in all that "reward" candy?  How many from "math activities?"  How many from birthday cupcakes and class parties??


And ultimately, why on EARTH is it okay for schools to systematically be teaching kids UNHEALTHY ways of relating to food??  This is nuts.
 :banghead:
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Carefulmom on February 15, 2012, 06:02:05 PM
Obese children outgrowing school furniture.


I'm so appalled by this that I'm virtually speechless.  Firstly, how can schools possibly not see the obvious-- that the longer they keep chucking cupcakes and candy at kids, THE FATTER THEIR STUDENTS ARE GETTING??


Secondly, why is it that

Quote
Being set apart from peers by sitting in a different chair means "their peers recognize them as large, different," said Dr. Phil Wu, a pediatrician who leads Kaiser Permanente's pediatric obesity prevention and treatment effort.

"At all ages, kids don't want to feel different," Wu said. "They get ostracized by the peers in subtle and not-so-subtle ways. It's more of that social psychological impact that's insidious in a way that's more profound than what the child might experience than sitting in a standard seat."



It's not okay for a kid whose own CHOICES (mostly) have placed them in that position to feel "unhappy" and "excluded" by peers...
No, that would be WRONG, since it would by pschologically harmful to do that to a child...


but it's just fine and dandy for food allergic children (whose own behavior DOES NOT lead to their circumstances) to be systematically excluded and ridiculed by activities which are mostly not even educationally relevant to START with??!!?

WOW.  Irony, much? I mean, this is freaking surreal. The amount of cognitive dissonance needed to do this particular sleight-of-hand on the part of educators is truly... mind-boggling in scope.

Maybe if you are morbidly obese... you should feel a bit motivated to do something to change that, yes?  That's not the same thing as being hobbled by rhuematoid arthritis, struggling with a learning disability, or being legally blind.

If schools were routinely contributing to any of those latter three conditions, there would be a tremendous public outcry DEMANDING that it cease.   Obesity?  Not so much, apparently.   :insane:  Apparently kids should just "say no" to cupcakes if they are already eating too much and moving too little.  Heaven forbid that Mrs. Feelgood, the junk-food pusher masquerading as an over-the-top class mom or teacher, should be told "stop it" for ANY reason...  or that instead of food, we encouraged physical activity in kids as a reward.   :bonking:

I just have to wonder where the disconnect is for educators in this country.  It's disgusting on so many levels that it's hard to even articulate.   :disappointed:


I googled him and he is at a Kaiser in Oregon.  Maybe you should email him and point out the double standard he is encouraging.  You make some really good points.
http://www.healthgrades.com/physician/dr-philip-wu-39kmx
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 15, 2012, 06:50:43 PM
I would, but I actually agree with his statement.  It is wrong to make children feel self-conscious or alienated in an educational setting.

 :thumbsup:

My beef is with the broader system.  It's an entire industry that doesn't seem to see the forest for the trees.   :-[
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 16, 2012, 11:11:31 AM
Why is it so hard for kids to lose weight?


Quote

Her efforts are working. At a time when approximately one-third of American children are overweight or obese, McDonald’s kids are at healthy weights.

So why is every day still a struggle for the blogger and mother of five?

“I have had to deal with teachers who hand out Skittles, candy bars, lollipops and giant frosted sugar cookies to the children in class … before 10 a.m.,” McDonald says. “I think this is setting kids up for failure and un-teaching the healthy habits I have instilled.”

The fact that doughnuts and cupcakes are given out as a reward after soccer practice or dance class is a paradoxical hurdle in the fight against childhood obesity. As doctors and parents struggle to encourage healthy behaviors, our sugar-filled, sedentary surroundings resist every step.


Think about it, says Dr. Stephen Daniels, chief pediatrician at Children’s Hospital Colorado. Every day kids are exposed to advertising about fast food instead of home-cooked meals. They’re surrounded by vending and soda machines at school. They have hundreds of channels on TV, own three video game systems and live in neighborhoods that were built without sidewalks.






Good.  FINALLY someone besides parents of diabetic and FA kids is starting to notice just how horrifying these practices are.  Notice that the physician (typically) misses the boat, though?  He still thinks that it's about WHAT kids are eating... and their activity levels...  not that adults in their lives are constantly SHOVELING junk food at them.   Someone should tell him to listen to parents like Mrs. McDonald, since she obviously sees into a relative blind spot for him.  No amount of sidewalk installation is going to make up for candybars and sugar cookies being incessantly used as operant conditioning tools.   :dunce:
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Mfamom on February 16, 2012, 12:47:21 PM
the title made me laugh...I couldn't see the whole thing until I opened the thread.  My poor kid (not obese) has been too big for school furniture since about 4th grade.  In 5th, he was 5'7" and seriously couldn't use a regular desk. 
Middle school furniture small too!

I hear you though.  I always crack up at the attempts at Wellness Education, but everytime you turn around, theres a food fest in the classroom or a bake sale going on in MS etc. 

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Janelle205 on February 16, 2012, 02:17:21 PM
On the other end of the spectrum...I was still swinging my feet as a senior in high school.  Couldn't touch the floor.


One of my larger classmates got stuck in a desk in middle school.  I felt so badly for him.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: lakeswimr on February 16, 2012, 02:38:03 PM
I think you make a good point that it is funny that people are worried that larger children will feel singled out but the same people might be sending in cupcakes to classrooms with FA kids.  I don't agree with you about your opinion on obesity in anyway.  If it were that simple to not be overweight or obese everyone would be thin.  No one wants to be overweight (or very few do, anyway).  It isn't simple to lose weight even for adults, never mind children.  My son has struggled with being too thin but my good friend's child is overweight.  She tries her best, I can attest.  It would not be easy for anyone to help that particular child to lose weight.  It is certainly not a simple thing in any case.   I don't ever seem to lose those 10 lbs I would like to lose (shrug) unless I have huge stress in my life.  Not easy for me.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 16, 2012, 03:53:11 PM
Actually, I'm definitely not harboring holier-than-thou feelings about kids and/or obesity.  My best friend was a "fat" kid, and I'm currently well over 50lbs over my ideal weight.  She struggled mightily with her weight all through junior high and high school, never managing to be thinner than about a BMI of 28-29 no matter WHAT she did... and it wasn't for lack of physical activity on her part or mine, I assure you-- we probably got 70+ minutes of aerobic activity daily.  The difference that strikes me, looking back on things, was that at my house, we had "meals" and there was little snacking outside of them.  Food just wasn't used that way.  At her house, it was constant 'nibbling' and no real meals, and binge eating was given tacit approval as a way to comfort or celebrate.  My DH's home was similar, btw.  No coincidence that both of them struggled with excess weight much earlier than I did, I think.  Now, she tried desperately to "eat right" but it isn't easy when food is constantly there as a temptation and the environment promotes deeply DISORDERED eating.  Oh, sure, it would be fine if people ONLY ate because of "hunger."  But they don't.  I'm not convinced that we're programmed that way as a species, honestly.  Food is about social activities and acceptance and comfort, and I think that may all be pretty hard-wired on some level.  Even breastfed children will feed for comfort rather than hunger. 

My DH and I both have genetics that mean that we ALWAYS struggle to keep our weight under control as adults.  Not "ideal"--  under control.  It's hard, hard work.  For me, that is related to physical activity, which I dislike.  For him?  It's disordered eating.    Weight management that needs hard work is almost certainly going to be DD's eventual reality, too, as thin as she is NOW (and she is).  I feel absolutely ill for kids that are already fighting like that when they are not even teenagers, because by the time they are my age?  :misspeak:  Holy cow, the effort and time needed is going to be unimaginable-- it gets harder as you get older, frankly.

I just think it's phenomenal that educators REFUSE to see the connection between a food SATURATED environment that encourages kids to eat continuously and to BINGE on high-sugar, high-fat treats regularly, and a greater and greater percentage of kids who are actually obese.    It's as though they are being willfully ignorant of reality itself, on some level.

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: maeve on February 16, 2012, 06:16:02 PM
Quote
It's as though they are being willfully ignorant of reality itself, on some level.

I'd have to say that you hit the nail on the head.  These are the same administrators who are ignorant of the risks of food in the classroom to FA kids and ignorant to the impact that repeated exclusion has on these students.  I've always been astounded that it has never seemed to dawn on teachers and administrators the serious negative impact to the trust an FA student has with a teacher when the teacher chooses to support food in the classroom and how this impacts learning (would you want to go the extra mile for someone who is not entirely supportive of you?).
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 16, 2012, 06:45:15 PM
What I find a joke is the "Wellness" policy.   The foods on the approved school lists (which feel by the wayside about 2 years after it was implemented) are somewhat questionable.  Many of the foods are high in sugar, some high in fat.  High in junk carbs too.  So much for wellness.  A policy created by some subgroup of people that probably don't really have a clue about nutrition.  Or maybe the nurses gave input and were shot down.  That happens. 

A child at 300 lbs?  This is morbidly obese.  That was at age 14 or 15, right?  Unless there is an underlying medical condition, is this not neglect?  What is the opposite--starvation?  Two extremes, but really.  These kids need larger desks?  How about an after-school program for "at-risk" youth.  They are indeed at risk for HBP, diabetes, among other things.   Kids, and their parents, could use intensive training on nutrition, portion sizes, and proper food ratios.  Like that is ever going to happen.  Wishful thinking.  It's going to be very hard on these kids as they enter adulthood.  I wish there was a magic bullet, but there isn't one.  It going to be a hard life for these kids in the long run.  A larger desk is the least of their problems.

I look at parents bringing in cupcakes, cookies, and junk.  Then the teachers who encourage the junk.  Many are not the picture of health and normal weight.  It's really a shame that, for some kids, their parents and teachers set terrible examples.  So unfortunate.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: ajasfolks2 on February 17, 2012, 07:38:59 AM
Quote
It's as though they are being willfully ignorant of reality itself, on some level.

I'd have to say that you hit the nail on the head.  These are the same administrators who are ignorant of the risks of food in the classroom to FA kids and ignorant to the impact that repeated exclusion has on these students.  I've always been astounded that it has never seemed to dawn on teachers and administrators the serious negative impact to the trust an FA student has with a teacher when the teacher chooses to support food in the classroom and how this impacts learning (would you want to go the extra mile for someone who is not entirely supportive of you?).


Needing Halleluja chorus right now!!   :thumbsup:

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 17, 2012, 10:22:14 PM
This is really powerful.  My only complaint is that I don't think it includes a sufficien number of birthday cupcakes in classrooms.  But I do like that the 'treat for good work' was featured. 


Stop the Cycle
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: maeve on February 18, 2012, 12:07:16 AM
That is powerful.  I am glad that they did include a teacher handing out candy as a reward.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: TabiCat on February 18, 2012, 06:55:25 PM
I am NO small person, very obese who has not seen much improvement despite regular exercise and carefully watching what I eat NOW after many years of not doing a good job in either area. When I think of how trim I was in middle school compared to now and then look at a classroom and can see between four and six 12- 13 yearolds who are at least as big as me NOW, it is heart breaking where will they be at my age (if they even make it that far)?   

It is so much easier to maintain a healthy body weight than to regain it. If only they could see and understand the long-term.   
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 19, 2012, 05:20:59 AM
I don't think food in schools is anywhere near as big an impact as lack of activity and cultural norms. My non food allergic daughters are offered all sorts of food daily, but don't eat it. Lessons learned in the black community would do us well to apply:

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/12/19/143848259/for-black-girls-lack-of-exercise-heightens-obesity-risk
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 19, 2012, 05:38:28 AM
Anyways. I agree with Mfamom. More kids need bigger desks and furniture and carseats, just because they are physiologically larger, not obese. Probably just as often as due to morbid obesity. Maybe more often. My mom always asked for a bigger (taller) chair and desk for me at parent orientation (now 5'10")

I know in kinder, only ONE girl is overweight. My daughter is one of the two  tallest (overweight child as tall as her). More kids that would need a bigger chair than those who were in MY kinder class due to stature alone. It's not that unusual anymore.


My daughter's weight fluxes between 52 and 57 lbs, and she's got six pack abs and speed skaters thighs at 5 1/2. She's a foot taller than some of her older peers in kindergarten. <shrug>

Doesn't mean there's something wrong with that and it's more and more common.

My older son was 50 lbs at a year, covered in rolls, and now is lean and towering in height. I wasn't feeding him anything unusual, I wasn't placating with food, it was just his normal development. I think helicopter parenting plays a HUGE role in childhood obesity. I think too many inactive parents set a crappy example and lead their children into a life of physical inactivity (and the comorbid eating out of boredom/too much time to eat/eating as entertainment.) I think charity starts at home.

I think it's easy for those of us whose children (and selves) fall easily within the "norm" to point fingers.  Finger pointing is understandable. It's human nature. It's easy. Harder though, is making physical activity a family thing. Working out together, family bike rides, nature trails, sledding, a walk around the block (several times), rollerblading....etc. Not sure if Wi-Fit is the worlds greatest idea but if it works, more power to ya. The object is to get them off the couch and away from the television....right?
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 19, 2012, 05:50:06 AM
I will say, though, that little girl is a very kind, personable, and considerate. Just like her mother. Also noting, her "body type" is very much like her parents. I don't think it's entirely due to nutrition. Heredity plays a HUGE role. I don't think it's impossible to overcome, but I don't think every child can look like a cookie cutter child physically, either. Good lipid profiles don't always come with "skinny" genes, either.  :tongue:  I'm not muscular, not rail thin, but not obese, either. I have some muffin top. But my lipid profile and cardiovascular fitness are something to be envied.  :evil: I don't work incredibly hard at it either (good think, I love my shellfish and butter). I might not fit into my highschool genes when I'm old, but God willing,  I run circles around those who do, who aren't dead by then.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Scout on February 19, 2012, 11:44:32 AM
I too do not think food belongs in school......however I do not think it adds to obesity.......come on.....Im gonna be unpopular....but I dont see the connection to most kids....maybe some, but not an epidemic.

you can pack your own lunch and even a cupcake a week in class is not gonna make you fat...

my ds (non allergic) buys lunch everyday, and snacks, and probably ever treat handed to him........5'8" andd 137......six pack.

its just his build and he is atheltic......

dd is thicker.....just naturally........she will have a harder time....and she dances 19 hours a week now.......6 days a week **Wednesday is off.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 19, 2012, 04:30:41 PM
...When I think of how trim I was in middle school compared to now and then look at a classroom and can see between four and six 12- 13 yearolds who are at least as big as me NOW, it is heart breaking where will they be at my age (if they even make it that far)?   

It is so much easier to maintain a healthy body weight than to regain it. If only they could see and understand the long-term.

I'm with you, sister, right with you!  This is what I see too. 

I've read or heard this from 3 people (trainers or people in that field) in the last three months.  80% of our physique is what we put in our mouths, 10% genetics, 10% exercise.  Obviously, if you come from a family of large-boned people, you'll probably be large boned.  If you family is tall, you'll probably be tall.  Normally, we are not destined to be heavy.  We do that to ourselves.  Knowing that 80% of that equation is what we put into our mouths is alarming. 

A fair number of kids aren't being trained on proper nutrition in the home, and to get the extra crap in school is just as bad.  I wish fixing the problem was as simple as packing a lunch.  It isn't.  Sorry, fruit roll ups aren't fruit.  A Lunchable is basically junk food.  Candy bars, cookies, salty, crappy junk food.  Yeah, that's what lunch is these days.   Ask how many kids who have had broccoli, apples, or bananas in the past week and let's see how few hands go up in the classroom.   My younger daughter who is a high school senior says that two pop tarts are a snacktime staple between breakfast and lunch.  Who knows what these kids had for breakfast, although I do know that a few girls are trying to eat healthier salads at lunch.  Then again, it's prom dress buying time.  Their healthy eating habits, if they've acquired them, are likely to be shortlived. 

My big worry are those elementary kids who are large now, and there are far too many of them.  It's much easier to gain control of the situation while they're very young and rebuild their eating habits than it is to let things go.  People get alarmed when they see a stick-thin child.  We should also be alarmed when we see obese children.  They need help now.  Supplying bigger desks is simply putting a bandaid on an immediate, superficial problem.   The real core of the problem is childhood obesity.  I'm glad it's at the top of Michelle Obama's agenda.   
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 19, 2012, 04:38:57 PM
Here's another point to ponder.  Ryan says in gym class (in our district), they're doing away with games with "human" targets.  Like Dodge Ball or Battle Ball!  They have to use nerf-style balls but can't play those games.  Kick balls aren't used anymore. 

Here's part of the problem.  Most of the kids like games like Dodge Ball or Battle Ball.  All you need to do is move.  No particular skills are necessary.  The kids can still play Basketball and Soccer, but not all kids are skilled in those sports.  Thus, some kids just lose interest.  I wish gym class was like a small sampling of school which use heart monitors and have kids pick their activity with measurable progress to get an A.  Gym classes are losing kids' interest at a time when it has never been more important. 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 19, 2012, 04:56:26 PM
...When I think of how trim I was in middle school compared to now and then look at a classroom and can see between four and six 12- 13 yearolds who are at least as big as me NOW, it is heart breaking where will they be at my age (if they even make it that far)?   

It is so much easier to maintain a healthy body weight than to regain it. If only they could see and understand the long-term.


I'm with you, sister, right with you!  This is what I see too. 

I've read or heard this from 3 people (trainers or people in that field) in the last three months.  80% of our physique is what we put in our mouths, 10% genetics, 10% exercise.


don't believe everything you hear. Especially when it comes from three um....personal trainers who aren't in research...



bold added.

Quote
Frustrated by the fact that no matter how much time you log on the treadmill your body wants to stay the same size? Turns out your genes may be the reason. Researchers at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden found that no amount of dieting will alter the number of fat-hoarding cells in our bodies. According to their findings published in the science journal Nature, it seems that the number of fat cells is predetermined during adolescence and stays the same later in life. How and where you store fat can’t be changed, and is one of the reasons why dieting doesn’t often work for many people.
Read more at FYI Living: http://www.fyiliving.com/diet/weight-loss/dieting-verus-genetics-why-genes-influence-weight-loss/#ixzz1ms2rYCBg
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 19, 2012, 04:58:11 PM
Here's another point to ponder.  Ryan says in gym class (in our district), they're doing away with games with "human" targets.  Like Dodge Ball or Battle Ball!  They have to use nerf-style balls but can't play those games.  Kick balls aren't used anymore. 

Here's part of the problem.  Most of the kids like games like Dodge Ball or Battle Ball.  All you need to do is move.  No particular skills are necessary.  The kids can still play Basketball and Soccer, but not all kids are skilled in those sports.  Thus, some kids just lose interest.  I wish gym class was like a small sampling of school which use heart monitors and have kids pick their activity with measurable progress to get an A.  Gym classes are losing kids' interest at a time when it has never been more important.

oh, lordy, please, DON'T bring back Dodge Ball. I play it at the park district, but it's cutthroat. I still get twitchy when people mention the name. It doesn't belong in school, unless you're trying to teach a duel to the death.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: TabiCat on February 19, 2012, 05:41:04 PM
KK- Not sure they are completely right about that. I never ate all that differently than the people around me in many cases even my worse eating habits were much better than their best yet they are MUCH smaller than I now. I am referring to people I have known for years.

That is why I am so particular about my kids eating habits now if they got my families genetics rather than their dad's they have no leeway, no wiggle room. Good eating habits are even more crucial for them than their piers.

       
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 19, 2012, 10:12:42 PM
Exactly, Tabi.  I know that is true for my DD.  My eating habits were good.  While they were good and while I was fairly active, I had no serious problems with my weight.

  When I adopted the same kinds of eating habits that my DH was raised with (eating for comfort, to reward myself, for celebration, for social reasons) as a young adult, that was when I began to pile on weight, and no amount of physical activity has been enough to take me back to where I once was. 

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 19, 2012, 10:16:35 PM
http://natemiyaki.com/2011/03/24/the-8020-rule-of-fitness-nutrition/

http://www.healthnfitnesscare.com/nutrition-and-fitness-the-8020-rule.html

Just a couple of many.  I know it's hard to believe.  I didn't believe it at first either.  The downside is, if a person simply focuses on diet alone, weight loss will happen.  They may not be fit, but the physique will change.   I thought exercise and activity was way higher.  It's not.  Ditto with heredity. 

Most are not born to be obese.  We do that to ourselves by what enters out mouths.  Ditto with kids.  Part of the crux of the issue is there's no need to be on any diet.  We just need to eat a lot cleaner and practice proper portion control.  It's pretty simple. 

Please don't point fingers and tell me I don't know what I'm talking about because I'm thin.  I could easily be heavy.  I gained 35 lbs. in 3 mos. in college by drinking beer and eating junk.  Lots of it.  That's a huge weight gain for me.  I went home, changed my eating habits to very clean eating and lost 37 in almost 4 mos.  No working out back then. 

School age kids eat a tremendous amount of junk food provided by parents and the school.  It's such a shame. 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 20, 2012, 08:27:53 AM
From your article link, Ark:

Quote
Kolata concluded that it’s not a lack of a willpower that keeps us above our idealized target weight. ”Scientists know that animals and people have a range of weights that they can comfortably sustain. Each person’s range is different but any weight much above or below a person’s range is almost impossible to maintain.”  There is no perfect diet, she insists. “In the end,” she adds, “no matter what the diet and no matter how hard they try, most people will not be able to lose a lot of weight and keep it off. They can lose a lot of weight and keep it off briefly, they can lose some weight and keep it off for a longer time, they can learn to control their eating, and they can learn the joy of regular exercise…The effort, the lifelong effort, can be rewarding. But true thinness is likely to elude them.”

So if you’re going to fixate on something, you’ll get better results with concentrating on eating the right kind of foods and getting regular exercise and letting your genes do their thing. Try not to get discouraged by this news, but rather know that you’re just as nature intended you.


"idealized target weight".  Everyone has their ideal.  Compare that with a baseline metabolic rate and and an active metabolic rate for amount of calories one should consume based on age and activity level to get some ideas of numbers.  The numbers help find that range. 

Take out junk food.  Add fruits and veggies.  Limit sugars and crap carbs.  Consume adequate protein.   Eliminate soda and limit juice consumption.   Follow the guidelines of what we should be seeing on our plates at mealtimes.   For virtually every obese young child, I guarantee you nobody is doing this for them, and the parents aren't modeling it either.  Far from it. 

It's not about being thin.  It's about not being obese and having a decent BMI.  I can cite numerous examples of real people who supposedly come from a family of "heavy" genes.  Example 1:  A lunch monitor at our school (and her husband) are large people on the heavy side.  As long as I've known their daughters, they've been heavy and overweight.  The entire family is overweight.  Is it in their genes?  To be a larger size, yes.  heavy no.  How do I know this?  The younger daughter got tired of being heavy and she started eating healthy.  Today she is a normal size for a girl of her height, frame, and age.  The mother has also shed major poundage.  The mother is still large sized, but she is not obese like she used to be.   Could the mother shed more?  Probably, but she has likely added years to her life just based on what she has lost and has kept off thus far.  Her daughter is to be commended for tackling this problem head on in a healthy way and getting her weight under control now.  It will always be work for her.

One of my friends that I've known for 15 years (same age as me).  She's a nurse who works full time but joined my gym about 6 years ago.  She's always been heavy, but works out all the time.  She's not heavy anymore.  She totally revamped her eating program and lost 70 lbs.  She looks terrific.  It will always be work for her to keep it off.  Her focus was blood sugar and HBP levels.  Sounds like me lol.  The goal was to get healthy. 

There is a point to this not to be missed:

Quote
Frustrated by the fact that no matter how much time you log on the treadmill your body wants to stay the same size? Turns out your genes may be the reason. Researchers at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden found that no amount of dieting will alter the number of fat-hoarding cells in our bodies. According to their findings published in the science journal Nature, it seems that the number of fat cells is predetermined during adolescence and stays the same later in life. How and where you store fat can’t be changed, and is one of the reasons why dieting doesn’t often work for many people.

Everyone has an optimal weight.  Our bodies do want to remain at that optimal weight.  Yes, genes are the reason for that.  If everyone ate following proper dietary principles, they'd find out what they're weight should be.  If the number of fat cells is predetermined during adolescence, isn't it imperative that we tackle the issue of childhood obesity as early as possible?

How and where one stores fat can't be changed.  I agree.  It's why we talk about apple shapes and pear shapes.  Dieting doesn't work.  Agree again.  Healthy eating and portion sizes DO work.  The problem is, most parents and a lot of kids simply don't know what healthy eating is.  They think they're eating healthy, and they're not.  They're consuming far more calories than they ever should in a day. 

I don't want the point of this article to be missed.  Genes play into the equation.  But they are not nearly as much as you think.  Genes will determine things like frame size, where are fat deposits will be, etc.  I reiterate though, most of us are not born to be obese.  We do that to ourselves.  If we blame our size on genetics, we our doing ourselves a dis-service. 

I always thought I did have heavy genes in my family tree.  My maternal grandmother was a heavy woman.  I grew up seeing her that way.  When I was 16, she collapsed in her kitchen and was rushed to the hospital.  She hadn't seen a doctor in 20 years, but at age 69 she was diagnosed as a diabetic with HBP and glaucoma.  The RD developed a nutritionally sound meal program for her along with her diabetes meds.  We visited her a year later and my jaw dropped.  My grandmother was not a heavy woman at all.  Give her sound meal plan which my stubborn, German grandmother followed, and her "ideal" weight was a result of that plan.  It was at age 17 I realized there were no "fat" genes in my family.   My grandmother was formerly heavy because she was eating far too much of everything, including junk food.   

Some kids will be bigger than others due to genetics.  Their frames sizes may be bigger.  But most of those obese kids in school can be helped.   Obesity is not in our genes.  Not in most of us anyway.   I love Michelle Obama's platform.  She's trying to bring attention to this.  Until parents get on the bandwagon though, I don't see any real change.  Heavy kids need to be helped like starving kids.  It's that serious a health issue.  Maybe not immediate like starving children, but it will be later in their lives.  It's a terrible situation.  I hate seeing kids being made fun of due to their weight too.  But that's a different social issue. 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 20, 2012, 08:35:25 AM
Ark, the kids can't even play Dodge Ball with a sponge ball!  Yes, I did say sponge ball which is as light as a feather.  The kids can only aim below the belt.  If they hit higher, they are removed from the game.  And now they can't even play that at all. 

The new rules are far from "old school".  When I was a kid, we'd throw anywhere from head to toe with something like a kick ball.  I mean, if you got hit, chances are you got a bit of a sting.  Get hit with a sponge ball below the belt?  It's like nothing. 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 20, 2012, 09:42:21 AM
Ark, the kids can't even play Dodge Ball with a sponge ball!  Yes, I did say sponge ball which is as light as a feather.  The kids can only aim below the belt.  If they hit higher, they are removed from the game.  And now they can't even play that at all. 

The new rules are far from "old school".  When I was a kid, we'd throw anywhere from head to toe with something like a kick ball.  I mean, if you got hit, chances are you got a bit of a sting.  Get hit with a sponge ball below the belt?  It's like nothing.

the point is, it doesn't matter what "the rules" are. Kids are going to break them. They ARE going to aim dirty and take cheap shots. It's the nature of the game, particularly with immature adolescents and emotional children. Scores will be settled....

but wrtypp:  The point is, physical fitness shouldn't have the primary GOAL of whether you fit in your hs jeans or not. That fitting in your hs jeans isn't a good indicator of how "fit" you are. That even if you manage to do it, if you have to struggle to maintain it, it's probably not going to last. That life long "flip flopping" is counterproductive. But that's another thread...
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 20, 2012, 09:44:56 AM
hmmm...I know there is a formula for surface area to air volume to maximize the SMACK of a dodgeball. We used to let just enough air out of them. You pick the dented ones to get a good grip.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 20, 2012, 09:52:29 AM
604dodgeball Season 7 Promo Trailer
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 20, 2012, 10:26:41 AM
Quote
That even if you manage to do it, if you have to struggle to maintain it, it's probably not going to last.

Not to confuse struggle with work.  Trying to eat right in a world filled with junk food via media, schools, etc., IS a struggle.  And it IS work.  It is most certainly a struggle to say no to junk food in schools when it's being shared with everyone.  I wish school principals were adamant about serving water only, fruit, fat-free/low fat plain yogurt and veggies in vending machines.  Our FBLA is currently selling candy bars.  They sell out like hotcakes.  All the kids buy them. 

Not only are our cupcake queens damning the kids, the school's are doing it, too, by what they sell via fundraisers, in vending machines, spineless administrators, very poorly executed wellness programs, etc.  Parents contribute to the problem as well with food choices.

Schools need bigger furniture?  There's a bigger problem here, no pun intended.  Sadly, school's will probably take the easy way out.  They will buy the furniture.  Tackling childhood obesity will be a struggle and it IS work.   Unfortunately, too few are rising to the challenge to tackle it head on.  Long term, it's a ticking time bomb.  As in healthcare costs.  Another thread altogether.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 20, 2012, 10:32:10 AM
If the number of fat cells is predetermined during adolescence, isn't it imperative that we tackle the issue of childhood obesity as early as possible?



Yes, yes, yes.


And something that Ark mentioned resonates within the context of this particular point, as well--



why are we making is so darned HARD to eat healthily-- as a culture, I mean??


If we were truly serious about this entire issue, we'd start limiting where/when food is used.  I cannot BELIEVE that nobody but us (well, and a few odd ducks out there among other parents who apparently have their eyes open) sees the sheer saturation environment that our kids are living in.

THAT is where genetics plays a huge role.  Is it "willpower?"  Well, only sort of.  Some of us really are programmed to store fat efficiently from available food stores.  This has always been an evolutionary advantage, at least until now.  The MAJORITY of human beings on this planet are evolutionarily adapted to survive periodic famine-- not endless smorgasbord.    Dieticians are just plain STUPID not to pay any attention to this basic fact of biochemistry and biology.  We are not MEANT to 'resist' food when it is provided.  Our every biological drive is to eat what is placed in front of us-- either until we can't eat any more or until it is gone.   Gluttony may be a sin in moral terms, but it's a biological drive that allowed human beings to survive their first few hundred millennia.  "Thin" genes, frankly, are probably the anomoly, since until recently that was a serious disadvantage to survival.

The only way to win that one is to quit having it placed in front of us in such quantities, or so frequently.   :-[
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Carefulmom on February 20, 2012, 10:39:54 AM
I have to keep this short.  The bulk of the childhood obesity problem is at home.  Parents are modeling atrocious eating habits.  They are in denial about their obese kids and say they are merely "big boned".  They refuse to hear from their pediatrician that their child is on the road to type to type 2 diabetes and a short life span.  When I tell them to throw away the soda and chips, they look at me like I am from another planet.  The parents are eating the soda and chips, too.  They won`t put the kids on a "diet" (i.e. throw away the junk food), because then the parents would have to do follow the same healthy eating habits, and they don`t want to do that.  Studies on adopted kids as adults have shown repeatedly that heredity can make you 10 pounds overweight or 10 pounds underweight, but that is all.  It can`t make you obese.  That is due to eating habits.  (There are a few very specific hereditary diseases that would be an exception to this.)  However, lack of teaching kids nutritious eating in childhood almost always gives them huge obstacles in maintaining a normal weight in adulthood.  It may also give them increased fat cells.  That has been debated, but I personally believe it. 

I cannot even count the number of times that I have heard a parent say that their child eats almost nothing while the child is sitting there eating a bag of fast food right in front of me.  Um, yeah, he won`t eat his dinner, because an hour and a half before dinner he downed a double cheeseburger, fries, and a chocolate shake.

I think Michelle Obama as a role model for healthy eating is a joke.  She is overweight herself, so IMO not a role model.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 20, 2012, 10:46:58 AM
The only difference between my daughter and her friends-- a couple of whom already are overweight-- is that she doesn't eat a lot of junk and NOTHING in a school environment. 

Does she eat fast food?

Sure, occasionally.  VERY occasionally.

Does she eat "junk" food?  Yes, again-- cookies, candy, chips, crackers.  She has a tendency to binge, I might add, so we don't bring a lot of it home in the first place, since Dad also has this 'bingeing' trait.

What she does NOT do is live in a school environment that pushes food-food-food at her all day long.  She does NOT eat and eat at every single youth activity she attends. 

I think that is the secret to her slim physique, honestly.  It's the secret that has most FA kids staying slim even if their peer cohort isn't.  They have built in "willpower" that their peers do not.   
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 20, 2012, 12:21:25 PM
Ive always said life threatening  food allergies come with the fringe benefit of a healthier lifestyle.  for the family unit, even. ironic, huh?
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 20, 2012, 12:30:55 PM
Makes me very sad for what we're doing (as a culture, I mean) with the rest of our children, though.   :-[

Kids with LTFA now are living the kind of 'food' lifestyle that people a generation or more ago did.

Now that is an interesting epidemiology study... wonder how kids with LTFA (to soy, milk, or egg-- none of which INHERENTLY compromise nutrition, but which do make most spontaneous eating off limits) compare to their age cohort with no allergies...

I'll bet that LTFA kiddos look more like their parents' generation in terms of BMI and blood chemistry.

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 20, 2012, 12:59:45 PM
Yes, and Ark mentioned something about a struggle.  If weight loss is such a struggle, then maybe it just can't be maintained.  I'm looking at the angle of limiting certain foods.

Our FA children live that every day.  Children with multiple food allergies certainly have a struggle.  `Avoidance is imperative.  It's a life or death situation.  And they just do it.  Day in, day out. 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 20, 2012, 01:02:30 PM
Carefulmom, I agree with everything you have posted.  Except for Michelle Obama ;) .  At least she's talking about it.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 20, 2012, 01:14:58 PM
CM, I'm going to guess that part of the problem is our taste buds have been conditioned like junky foods. 

Lack of time too.  It's quicker to open a bag of chips than to peel an orange.  Or cut up broccoli and serve with some low-fat ranch dressing.

Good, healthful eating takes a bit of time and effort.  Ditto with measuring and controlling portions. 

What about eating out?  We rarely eat out due to Ryan's food allergy.  So it's a rare day that we have those 1500-2000 calorie+ meals at one sitting.   I know people that eat out 2 or 3X/week. 

Everything is about convenience.  Quickness of preparation.  Is it a matter of willpower?  To a certain degree.  But good, healthy food does taste really good.  If people would only give their taste buds a chance.  It's not about deprivation.  For example, I made up a batch of 16 blueberry "cookies" last night.  These are the go-to snacks for DH, myself, and DD#2.  Highly nutritious, protein packed, fiber rich, antioxidant boosting, no sugar, 150 calories large snack cookies.   Our mini meal between meals.  And every time I make them my boys want one too!

Good, nutritious, portion-sized food can be delicious.  It just takes time and some effort.   And unfortunately, that's where I think things fall apart.  We want everything down to the food we eat to be quick and easy. 

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 20, 2012, 01:17:14 PM
Ive always said life threatening  food allergies come with the fringe benefit of a healthier lifestyle.  for the family unit, even. ironic, huh?

Yes, a silver lining to the dark FA cloud!
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 20, 2012, 01:52:49 PM
But kk, fitnees isnt measured in how someone looks in a size four vs a size six.  trimming every last quarter inch, yk?  at that point youre really setting your body up for a starvation setpoint. its going to fight back.  if people worried more about a lifestyle instead of a twelve week diet and what they cant have and more abiut daily heakthy routines and choices. less focus on looks and deprivation. more on the benefits.  i think becca does that wonderfully. splurges are okay. i mean real nitty gritty ones. it lets your bod know the end of the world isnt here yet.  i truthfully dont want my daughters joy in life to stem from a cumulative loss of one inch. Theres a reason too skinny women often cease to have menses...
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 20, 2012, 02:31:12 PM
But kk, fitnees isnt measured in how someone looks in a size four vs a size six.  trimming every last quarter inch, yk?  at that point youre really setting your body up for a starvation setpoint. its going to fight back.  if people worried more about a lifestyle instead of a twelve week diet and what they cant have and more abiut daily heakthy routines and choices. less focus on looks and deprivation. more on the benefits.  i think becca does that wonderfully. splurges are okay. i mean real nitty gritty ones. it lets your bod know the end of the world isnt here yet.  i truthfully dont want my daughters joy in life to stem from a cumulative loss of one inch. Theres a reason too skinny women often cease to have menses...

That's what I've always been saying.  I've never talked about a size.  Or a weight for that matter.  Heck, I weigh myself about once every year?  Healthy, clean eating and proper portions sizes will drop weight if one is carrying an excess.  I've always advocated a good lifestyle like that. Getting back to my own 12-week plan, it is not a diet.  What I'm doing is retraining my body to accept 6 small meals/day and retrain my taste buds getting away from flour and sugar.  What I've been doing for decades isn't cutting it in life after 40.  I'm developing a new plan based on Tosa Reno's Eat Clean principles.  The 12-week plan is a challenge.  I'm challenging my body to accept a new, higher number of meals with a cleaner philosophy.   After 12 weeks, it is adapting to the plan. 

Is is something I can maintain long term?  Absolutely.  Fitness is different.  Fitness is exercise.  A person can be thin and not fit.  Not my aim at all. 

Eating has to be a lifestyle.  I don't do diets.  What I'm doing is retraining my taste buds to avoid flour and sugar and adapting to a different meal system.  The 12-week challenge is merely a kick start to an up-to-date plan.  BTW, it is working splendidly :) .
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 20, 2012, 04:55:40 PM
Interesting read in our local paper today:

Rob McKenzie
Rounding Some Corners

February 20, 2012

Because it tastes so good, you greet the morning with it, you allow it stalk you all day and it's right there at the end of the day.

You can't escape it unless you aggressively go out of your way to eliminate it.

But you should, because sugar is really bad for you and it's in almost everything you eat and drink.

The late cardiologist Robert Atkins, creator of the Atkins low-carbohydrate diet, said the most important thing parents can do is keep their children away from sugar.

He was right on.

Excessive sugar — especially processed sugar with the minerals, proteins and vitamins removed — is poisonous because the body tries to break down these empty carbohydrates by releasing already-stored minerals and vitamins.

The draining of these essentials from our bodies puts stress on the nervous and respiratory systems and vital organs.

Sugar also blunts the taste buds to the savory qualities of natural sugars. If you eat a doughnut and then an orange, the orange tastes sour.

But if you eat the orange first, it's sweet. So when we eat a lot of processed sugar, we don't crave foods with natural sugars that keep us healthy.

The more we eat foods with natural sugars, the better they taste and the more we want them. The more we eat foods with processed sugar, the more we want them instead.

Sugar also makes us hyperactive. Eating or drinking a lot of it makes it hard to sit still or concentrate.

And, of course, sugar gives us a nice layer of flab.

Unfortunately, it's damn near impossible to avoid sugar all day long.

Breakfast time. Want some cereal or a muffin? Take your pick: Either way you're taking in mouthfuls of sugar.

Later your thirst leads you to grab a soda. A 12-ounce can of Coke contains the equivalent of 20 cubes of sugar. And if you drink a can of Coke every day, you're drinking 32 pounds of sugar a year.

Lunch time. How about a sandwich? The bread has sugar, and so do many kinds of chips as well as the ham and coleslaw or potato salad or pickles.

Later in the afternoon you fill in the lull with gum, candies or other sweets.

Sugar city.

Dinner time. Pasta with red sauce? Lots of sugar. A green salad covered with dressing? Basically sugar soup with vegetables.

Ready for dessert? Let's not even talk about it.

Researchers from the University of California at San Francisco want sugar regulated like alcohol and tobacco because the effects are so harmful, yet the consumption of sugar has tripled in the last 50 years.

It sure is a sweet life we have. Too bad it's not the healthy life we need.

But at least at the end of the day we can make the last thing we put in our mouths something without sugar: toothpaste.

What?! Oh no"¦

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And that's the typical day of an adult.  Wonder what he'd think of all the crummy food in schools and the cupcake queens who are hellbent on serving their little goodies to our impressionable youth.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: lakeswimr on February 20, 2012, 09:18:48 PM
CM--I think that sounds similar to how I grew up and long-term it wasn't good for me or my brothers.  We had almost not access to junk food except on rare occasions.  My mother didn't have it in the house.  So, when we did get access to it we would overeat.  We were so conditioned to eat as much of that stuff as fast as we could due to our mother's strict rules.  It didn't work well when we went off to college and had free access to all foods.  I was so thin in my mothers house and would be now, too, because she was a lousy cook and I had almost no access to any candy or sweets or ice cream except a few times a year.  I think we all try to avoid doing what was done to us so with me and DS I try to make treats no big deal.  DS gets them a few times  a week.  He doesn't think of them as forbidden fruit the way I did and doesn't overeat.

DS is thin and I have had to TRY to fatten him up.  It's tricky.  He just isn't very into food and takes after his father's side of the family in that.  The stress when he was too thin was hard and then everyone would say, "oh, he looks so good!  He is nice and thin!" not realizing he was too thin and losing weight--not ever good for kids his age.

I have a friend who gives her kids treats daily but it is like ONE Hershey's kiss after lunch and another after dinner or two Oreos in the afternoon and that's it.  I saw her kids take 4 or 5 cookies each once and she got very upset with them.  They know that treats are things to eat in moderation and I think that will be lasting for her kids.  They have learned moderation, something I didn't learn.  Portion size, moderation, etc are all very important IMO. 
The only difference between my daughter and her friends-- a couple of whom already are overweight-- is that she doesn't eat a lot of junk and NOTHING in a school environment. 

Does she eat fast food?

Sure, occasionally.  VERY occasionally.

Does she eat "junk" food?  Yes, again-- cookies, candy, chips, crackers.  She has a tendency to binge, I might add, so we don't bring a lot of it home in the first place, since Dad also has this 'bingeing' trait.

What she does NOT do is live in a school environment that pushes food-food-food at her all day long.  She does NOT eat and eat at every single youth activity she attends. 

I think that is the secret to her slim physique, honestly.  It's the secret that has most FA kids staying slim even if their peer cohort isn't.  They have built in "willpower" that their peers do not.   
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 21, 2012, 06:03:56 AM
Part of the equation in finding out who will eventually be heavy or thin 20-30 years in the future is to look at the parents.  This is NOT foolproof by any means, but it's a gauge.  An indicator so to speak.  I mean, we can say our kids are thin now, but they're paying attention to what we say and do.  Either consciously or subconsciously, they're watching what we do. 

Closely examine the eating habits and activities of the parents.  I've talked about modeling of behaviors.  Do the parents munch mindlessly on junk food in the car?  At school events?  Do they buy junk for their kids at school events?  I once watched a heavy mother give her borderline weight son money to spend on junk food at a band concert.  I watched him eat through at least 1300 calories of junk food in 45 minutes.  Do they munch while watching TV?  Do they allow their kids to open up a big bag of, let's say, chips and eat through the entire bag while it's in their lap.  Are parents sedentary?  Do they lead an active lifestyle?

There's a phrase I use, "If you want a general idea to see what someone is going to look like in the future, look at their same sex parent."  NOT foolproof, of course.  Just a general idea.  When I look at myself and my siblings, who we married, it holds true for ourselves and our spouses.  Look around.   I swear taste buds are genetic too.  How can I explain that no one in my family (my mom, dad, brother, two sisters, and myself) particularly cares for gummy, fruit stuff.  What do we all love?  Popcorn.  We love chocolate too.   My husband's family loves gummy, fruity stuff like gummy bears, Skittles, etc.  My kids, unfortunately, got taste buds for both. 

There are definitely exceptions to this rule, but I find it holds true in a number of cases.  We (as a society) have to change what's in our fridges and pantries.  We have to model portion control, moderation, and activity levels. 

This quote:

Quote
“I think sometimes parents may be in denial, because no parent wants to hear negative things about their child, and research has shown parents of obese kids consistently underestimate their risk,” says Michelle Justus, program manager of the Arkansas Center for Health Improvement, which produces the state’s BMI measurement results. “Part of it’s the way our lifestyle is now. The norm is getting more and more overweight, so at first look a child may not seem overweight compared to the other kids in his class.”


from this article:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168657/

is part of the problem.  Obesity, or being overweight, is such a tough problem to tackle because it's personal.   BMI reports are in-your-face document for parents of heavy kids.  A wakeup call that some don't want.  I know BMI reports are not accurate in some cases.  But let's face it.  If a child is obviously heavy or obese, the BMI report is probably right on target.  Schools, however, are handing out meaningless reports.  It's like a doctor giving a parent a blood test and saying, "Okay.  Your child has a food allergy" and sending them out the door with no specific plan, no epipen.  (We've been privy to some of those cases, right?)  What good is that?  I'd like to see more voluntary after-school or before-school intervention programs for these kids.  If we can help just one or two kids prevent a lifetime of obesity-related problems, consider the program a success.   Our school has bereavement, drug/alcohol, children of divorce, depression, suicide/anger management groups during lunch periods.  Why not add nutrition/exercise?       
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 21, 2012, 06:21:05 AM
If you can't read everything in Tosca's post, read the last line:

http://toscareno.blogspot.com/2011/06/calorie-counting.html

and her post on sugar:

http://toscareno.blogspot.com/2012/01/sugar.html

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: lakeswimr on February 21, 2012, 06:34:00 AM
I think looking at the parents was a good indicator for many in the past but not so much now.  In the 70s and 80s almost no one was overweight.  The people who seemed 'fat' back then would be average or slim by today's standards.  Foods are different now and activity level.  Back then we didn't have so many foods with HFCS, didn't have so many with partially hydrogenated oils, didn't have big boxes of crackers, big bags of chips, big bottles of ketchup, etc.  Portion sizes in restaurants were fairly reasonable.  People had to get off the couch to change channels when I was little even!  And there were huge chunks of the day when there wasn't anything good on tv and no internet, no texting, no cell phones, no facebook.  People were a lot more active as a result.  People eat more and exercise less.  The next generation is going to be even more sedentary than now and have even more access to processed foods, probably.  If we took everyone from now and time traveled back to the 70s almost everyone would lose lots of weight just from the lifestyle change and it wouldn't be a matter of dieting or will power or anything like that. 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 21, 2012, 08:19:38 AM
Yeah, but many of the parents I'm seeing now were kids in the 80's.  Advent of the VCR, video games, etc.  The parents I'm seeing are at least 10-15 years younger than me.  The difference in 10-15 years, in activity levels/activities and foods, is pretty big when you think about it.   I'm one of the "older" parents who had a childhood in a different decade.  We were outside in the 70's.  But when I think about my thin friends from my childhood, when I see them now on FB, most have taken on the shape of their same sex parent.   Nowadays, not only do they take on their parents food habits, but they're taking on their sedentary lifestyle from an early age. 

One food craze stands out in my mind.  The fat-free craze of the late 80's.  Huh?  Fat-free cookies are not health food BTW ;) .  Yet I would see people eating them like crazy because if it's fat-free, it's good for you.  A box and 2500 (or thereabouts) calories later...   Funny how those things go.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 21, 2012, 10:33:19 AM
CM--I think that sounds similar to how I grew up and long-term it wasn't good for me or my brothers.  We had almost not access to junk food except on rare occasions.  My mother didn't have it in the house.  So, when we did get access to it we would overeat.  We were so conditioned to eat as much of that stuff as fast as we could due to our mother's strict rules.  It didn't work well when we went off to college and had free access to all foods.  I was so thin in my mothers house and would be now, too, because she was a lousy cook and I had almost no access to any candy or sweets or ice cream except a few times a year.  I think we all try to avoid doing what was done to us so with me and DS I try to make treats no big deal.  DS gets them a few times  a week.  He doesn't think of them as forbidden fruit the way I did and doesn't overeat.

DS is thin and I have had to TRY to fatten him up.  It's tricky.  He just isn't very into food and takes after his father's side of the family in that.  The stress when he was too thin was hard and then everyone would say, "oh, he looks so good!  He is nice and thin!" not realizing he was too thin and losing weight--not ever good for kids his age.

I have a friend who gives her kids treats daily but it is like ONE Hershey's kiss after lunch and another after dinner or two Oreos in the afternoon and that's it.  I saw her kids take 4 or 5 cookies each once and she got very upset with them.  They know that treats are things to eat in moderation and I think that will be lasting for her kids.  They have learned moderation, something I didn't learn.  Portion size, moderation, etc are all very important IMO. 
The only difference between my daughter and her friends-- a couple of whom already are overweight-- is that she doesn't eat a lot of junk and NOTHING in a school environment. 

Does she eat fast food?

Sure, occasionally.  VERY occasionally.

Does she eat "junk" food?  Yes, again-- cookies, candy, chips, crackers.  She has a tendency to binge, I might add, so we don't bring a lot of it home in the first place, since Dad also has this 'bingeing' trait.

What she does NOT do is live in a school environment that pushes food-food-food at her all day long.  She does NOT eat and eat at every single youth activity she attends. 

I think that is the secret to her slim physique, honestly.  It's the secret that has most FA kids staying slim even if their peer cohort isn't.  They have built in "willpower" that their peers do not.   

That is-- for the record-- not AT ALL how DD lives. 

She has treats quite regularly.  I just don't keep BOXES or large bags of stuff in the house all the time, becuase if I do, DH will "model" bingeing behavior with it.  Him being diabetic, that is a real competing concern, by the way.    I do buy unsafe treats that DH doesn't like so that I can model "moderate" consumption for her. Moderate meaning that a box or tin of candy might last 3 weeks in my hands.

She probably eats food prepared outside the house at least three times a month (pizza, Taco Bell or Burgerville).

Believe me, I am all too well aware of the results of junk food "prohibition" having seen it with my best friend.  The secret is in teaching relating to food in healthy ways.  We DO NOT use food as a reward or a consolation prize.  EVER.

  But it is also true that some people naturally gravitate to candy and potato chips.  I'm not one of them; I'd rather eat cheese and apple slices, really, or popcorn.  My DD?  She most certainly is someone with a MAJOR sweet tooth, just like her dad.  We discuss how much this is going to be a struggle for her all her life-- to make better choices when she might be more naturally inclined to make worse ones instead, I mean.  Her weight isn't all that is at stake, given the strong genetic history of Type II diabetes in her family.  If she doesn't eat right, it won't matter how thin she is.

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: lakeswimr on February 21, 2012, 01:16:25 PM
Sounds like you handle it very well, CM.  I'm trying to not do what my mother did and I'm sure I'm messing him up in other unique ways she didn't do to me but at least I"m not doing what she did!  :)
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 21, 2012, 01:39:40 PM
Yeah-- I think that kids who live with Draconian food police parents probably aren't much better off than those with garbage-gut parents. 

It is much harder when our kids see so very much more prevelant unhealthy USE of food now, though. 

I find it horrifying that sugary, fatty foods are "necessary" after a short amount of moderate physical activity...  just horrifying.  What ever happened to... um... water for hydration (barring extreme temperature or exertion, I mean)....

Because I'm thinking that 16 oz. of Gatorade and a bag of Doritos pretty much more than makes up for half an hour of sporadic activity at 2nd grade soccer practice.   :dunce:

Nevermind the "smarties" for "smarties" who get an A on a ten minute spelling test. 

When one adds up all that stuff over the course of a year, it's really surreal.  I did the math once over at the old site.  It was absolutely stunning how my guesses for frequency and caloric content added up pretty much PERFECTLY to the average excess weight that kids are carrying around by the end of adolescence.   :-[  It's about 12 pounds.  Per kid.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: GingerPye on February 21, 2012, 02:10:09 PM
I have bought a few candies that DS likes recently --- sure wish DH would stay out of them.  (and he's diabetic) 
I send a small dessert in DS's lunch every day, like a few of the orange circus peanuts candy that is safe for him, one of his favorites.  I pulled the bag out this morning and there are 3 of them left in there, after DS had 3 the day I opened the bag, a few weeks ago. 
*I* didn't eat them.  DD doesn't like them.  DS cannot reach them (I put them up high).  Had to be DH. 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 21, 2012, 02:37:01 PM
my kids lean up over the school year.  :misspeak:

No lie. They probably put on a few pounds over the summer because I get to cook for them more often and they miss fewer meals...i cook goooooood.

That said, I'm continually STUNNED how many kids in Jr. High and HIGHSCHOOL especially, come back to school porked out. Sometimes in just a matter of a month between May and the start of band camp. They lean up fast in those 10-12 hour days marching.

but really, I've seen some of them eat at a buffet. Girls included.  :misspeak: :-X :misspeak:

When the band was serving full service buffet style meals and I was volunteering for them freshman year, my grown son was coming to ME asking if a second hamburger was okay. Or if he could have two hot dogs AND a sloppy joe. 

Why?  because we are VOCAL in our household about PIGGISHNESS. I tell my daughters: 

"If you eat a second ice cream bar you're going to get a FAT a** BUTT. The kids will call you FATTY and you won't fit into all those pretty clothes you LOVE. You'll have to wear a MOO-MOO and gymshoes."

I compliment my older son on his lean body all the time. I tell him how GLAD I am he's not a BIG FAT TALL GUY WITH A HUGE GUT THAT HAS TO WEAR 3XXX flannel shirts and sweat pants in order to clothe himself.  It's one thing to be fat, but when you're tall and fat, you saddle a heart with 400 pounds easily. Your joints get tore up. Plan on double knee replacements at 40.

Kids routinely follow dad and I to the basement gym for a quick 40 minute workout. We have bikes, roller skates, a stairmachine, mini tramp, and a mat.

If I have to.....I pull out my fourth grade fatty picture.  :evil:

I had a relatively brief, but fat period due to inactivity, a homebody lifestyle, and parents who took me out to eat regularly with a candybar on top, then home to a science lab and comic books.

When I was 14 or 15, my mother joined a Chicago Health Club with me and the weight came off in three months. To this day, candy bars repulse me. On the otherhand, I swung over to the other end of the spectrum and ended up at 84 lbs and 5'10" for about a year.

But about those second or third hamburgers. I always tell them it's fine, but they have to eat a full serving of vegetables or fruit before they have it. <shrug> Works like a charm. Not only do they eat the fruit or veggies, but they are FULL afterwards. At 6'5" I'm entirely okay with my son having a second portion, but only if he's not going to be sitting on the couch all afternoon, yk? but point is....he's conscious of it. I see him choose Greek Yogurt over ice cream sandwiches. Younger son is a bit of a food fetishist, and will not eat anything with fat globs or that is greasy, but will scarf down fresh catfish by the pound. He's the one that will wait, hungry, if the rest of us are out eating, until he gets home to his favorites, which are generally very healthy. He's a whole wheat bagel, handful of fresh grapes, and um....Last Bald Eagle on the planet type of lunch guy.

I have no doubts he'd savor a Snowy Owl ka-bob.

He's an aristocrat ala Ferris Buehler and The Freshman rolled into one.  ;D

Of all my kids, he's the one most prone to an eating disorder because for him, interest in food isn't driven by hunger, but has to have a catch. A draw. Something spectacular about it. If I love through food with any of my children, it's probably most prevalent with him. I beg sometimes...

My father was Greek, a chef...of COURSE he loved through food. But it wasn't why I got fat for a period.  I think comfort foods are a good thing. I think nourishing a child is the most loving act a mother can do. It's how we are wired. It can't be wrong. A parent sacrificing seconds so their child can have them. Preparing Christmas dinner over the course of a week. Putting that special heart shaped sammie in a lunch. That's not what makes people fat.

SUBSTITUTING THAT for another of life's necessities? For emotional well being? In exchange for some other abuse? Sure. Then you have a problem. But no, I still need hot chicken soup when I'm under the weather. Better if it's homemade. I think NOT having those little acts of love lead to problems.

I remembered  my age when I joined the health club, because when I got that skinny....my period stopped for 18 months...
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 21, 2012, 02:51:16 PM
I do think, however, there is something to be said for what type of food you love with. My boys have told me over and over how GLAD they are I cook HEALTHY meals. LOL...my younger son recently went on a tirade about how I'm not like "all those mothers" who send processed fatty GARBAGE in their lunch or...or....."cook Kraft Mac and Cheese, open up mushy canned vegetables and call it dinner".

 :misspeak: His wife better have some culinary skills....

I also don't think substituting food for physical or social activity is a good idea, either. My parents were probably guilty of that, but as they were both older when I was born (almost 41 and 52), I think I'll cut them some slack in that regard.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 21, 2012, 02:59:47 PM
. double post. tried to remember when I joined a health club, edit the age, and quoted by accident. ack.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Mfamom on February 21, 2012, 03:08:38 PM
Yeah-- I think that kids who live with Draconian food police parents probably aren't much better off than those with garbage-gut parents

It is much harder when our kids see so very much more prevelant unhealthy USE of food now, though. 

I find it horrifying that sugary, fatty foods are "necessary" after a short amount of moderate physical activity...  just horrifying.  What ever happened to... um... water for hydration (barring extreme temperature or exertion, I mean)....

Because I'm thinking that 16 oz. of Gatorade and a bag of Doritos pretty much more than makes up for half an hour of sporadic activity at 2nd grade soccer practice.   :dunce:

Nevermind the "smarties" for "smarties" who get an A on a ten minute spelling test. 

When one adds up all that stuff over the course of a year, it's really surreal.  I did the math once over at the old site.  It was absolutely stunning how my guesses for frequency and caloric content added up pretty much PERFECTLY to the average excess weight that kids are carrying around by the end of adolescence.   :-[  It's about 12 pounds.  Per kid.

bold mine first sentence.  Totally agree!  there is a family in town and the mom is seriously a whack job.  When you first meet her, she'll insert that she has "food allergies" (she does not).  then start going on about food and what is bad for you etc. 
last summer their ds on our baseball team.  The mom and dad got into a fight in public about her weird food issues and how she needs to feed their children REAL food.
Later the dad vented that the kids are starving.  They are so pale OMG, skinny as rails. 
If their ds goes to someone's house for playdate etc, he eats nonstop.  We had a party at my house for  baseball and the dad just chowed for an hour.

She doesn't make meat of any type.  The dad is always complaining saying he'd love a steak once an awhile
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: lakeswimr on February 21, 2012, 07:57:48 PM
Ark, I am the type that if someone had talked to me that way it would have caused me to have an eating disorder.  Kids who tend to OCD probably can't take the 'that will make you fat' talk very well.  My parents focused too much on my weight, told me how good I looked when I was thin, talked about weight a lot and I think that was a large part of why I did have an eating disorder as a teen and at the start of college.  What got me over it was focusing on healthy eating, not weight.  I'd rather be a little overweight and eating-disorder free than thin and have an eating disorder. 

I don't think too many would do well with being told they are going to get fat.  I hope it will work for you.  No one would have know it wasn't working well for me -- I was one of the thinnest girls in highs school, in super good shape from working out and a great athlete.  I stayed relatively thin, although gained a lot in college was still on the thinner side compared to others.  But I was messed up from how I was raised. 

If i had a girl i wouldn't ever tell her she was fat or going to get fat.  I would focus on portion size, healthy eating, healthy habits, exercise, etc. 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 21, 2012, 09:14:14 PM
Definitely, lakeswimr.  We don't demonize food, either.  There really isn't a (safe) food that we consider "bad" to the point that "nobody should ever eat {whatever it is}."

Not even.... pork rinds.   :-X

Personally?  I wouldn't waste the calories.  Or salt.  LOL. 

But gimme cheesecake instead?  Oh-yeah. 

It's the INSTEAD part that is important there.   :yes:  That's basic awareness and decision-making.

If I choose to eat indulgently while, say, on vacation... I might well compensate for that with extra 10-20 minutes of exercise daily both before and after my vacation, or choose to be active through walking a lot of extra miles sightseeing (which is ususally what we wind up doing).
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 21, 2012, 10:09:58 PM
Being overweight IS an eating disorder.  school at 180 lbs, age ten was far worse than a parent telling you the truth about eating too many ice cream sammies. Cm if you tell someone the truth about an engineering class, dint be bashful about too many Klondikes. Thank goodness pediatricians arent sugar coating the truth. My weight plummeted because i wanted to dissapear.  i never wsnted to be teased by classmates again. Telling a child too many ice cream sandwiches make people fat isnt "that language" lol.  good luck to you too, lakeswimmer, i wish you luck when it comes to explaining booze and drugs.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 21, 2012, 11:26:08 PM
Ark, I am the type that if someone had talked to me that way it would have caused me to have an eating disorder.  Kids who tend to OCD probably can't take the 'that will make you fat' talk very well.   

Hmmmm....using that logic, I guess I shouldn't tell my kids that using street drugs can leave them brain damaged, or that diabetes shortens thier lives, or that being "casual" about a their food allergy, not reading labels, or leaving their epi pen at home can KILL them, huh? Might throw them into some disorder.....a depression....feeling put out.

good thing healthcare professionals are under an ethical obligation to be honest with their patients. Someone has to man up and not be the codependent.

Anyways.

Quote
My parents focused too much on my weight, told me how good I looked when I was thin, talked about weight a lot and I think that was a large part of why I did have an eating disorder as a teen and at the start of college.  What got me over it was focusing on healthy eating, not weight.  I'd rather be a little overweight and eating-disorder free than thin and have an eating disorder.

Yeah, well the fatter I got, my parents told me I was beautiful still, and took me to high end women's clothing stores in elementary school to find clothes that fit. Guess what? It didn't work. Cold hard truth wearing a Danskin and getting preliminary measurements in front of a room full of ADULTS did. I was a blubber butt.



fwiw, My daughter is in kinder and 56 pounds currently. She looks really skinny, though. Still, never had any "failure to thrive" issues... My younger son who has ALWAYS been my "picky eater" (odd nursing habits/odd bottle feeding posture) might shun food even when I'm BEGGING him to eat it. Food is on his terms. Generally, he has to be convinced there is something special about it. Might be a "middle child" thing. In any case, different kids, different strategies. But really, if I've pressed any issues in this thread, it's been that we *DO* stress a healthy food choices and provide them. My kids shop with me all the time. They know they aren't CHEAP choices either. LOL!

Quote
I don't think too many would do well with being told they are going to get fat.

Oh, good lord, I hope you aren't serious in your concern. I'm not standing over her with a gag threatening to put a lock on the fridge. I'm telling her a FACT. I'm telling her to eat the clementine instead. LOL!  I'm not telling her she's going to get fat. <end sentence> I'm telling her that if she gorges on foods that are meant as an "occassional" item, you'll get fat. A big butt. She's really never "gorged", but maybe that's because I've been honest with her. She's a smart girl, her typical response is "I'm still hungry, what else can I eat?"<but with more whine and inflection> Or "fine then, give me something else".

they really don't want seconds of that stuff anyway...

If I steam a bag of broccoli after such an encounter, they ALL come sniffing for some. My kids are "weird" that way: I can set them all up with a movie and steamed brocolli (no butter even and they HATE SALT) and it's like popcorn and candy to them. I buy brocolli six bags at a time or that super size multi serving bag at Sam's Club. They prefer a veggie tray without dip even, to pizza bites.

Go figure.

Quote
I hope it will work for you. 

works better than smiling and saying:  SURE!! Have a glass of rootbeer with it too!

Quote
I No one would have know it wasn't working well for me -- I was one of the thinnest girls in highs school, in super good shape from working out and a great athlete.  I stayed relatively thin, although gained a lot in college was still on the thinner side compared to others.  But I was messed up from how I was raised. 

I personally believe it takes *real* dysfunction to "mess" up a child. Telling them too much ice cream will make you fat isn't it. Now...maybe getting your a** handed to you DAILY by your peers, being ostracized, and a principal who tells you "don't you want to be like the <those little bastards> other kids" might point you in the right direction. But still, a loving family keeps you safely tethered and a safe distance from the cliff.   :) You have my condolences. My weight might have plummeted, but seeing the fear in the faces of my parents set me straight. I got sick of the nurse riling them up with phone calls about my well being and daily weights she was monitoring on me. They were good parents and didn't need that type of bs. Aside from pregnancy, my weight has been "normal" and pretty stable since.  :)


Quote
If i had a girl i wouldn't ever tell her she was fat or going to get fat.  I would focus on portion size, healthy eating, healthy habits, exercise, etc.

GOOD GRACIOUS YIKES! How freeking fragile are your kids? (or do you *think* they are)  We DO focus on portion size but hey, it doesn't take a child prodigy to figure out why when you're emphasizing the details. They add those details up and say:  If you eat too much you'll get fat! Your heart gets clogged! You'll have to stick needles in your fingers every day!

I need a coffee....you're making my head hurt. My daughter isn't an idiot. She knows damn well why I'm on that stair machine. Of course, she prefers a swim in the pool, or mom to take her to the playground, but when I get up at 4 am to push out an hour on it, she knows it's not for "fun".

Guess what?  Schools measure their BMI and send them home with a "PASS/FAIL" and an individual PROFILE of their physical ability. Uh, YEAH, they add that up to "maybe I'm too FAT". Overweight. Out of shape. Take your pick.

I generally don't say much about her food choices. My home is LOADED with good ones, available,  with a limited number of some pretty darned WORTHLESS CALORIES. I just speak up now and then and hand them the facts. Or praise their good choices.  Really, the older two (out of four children) handled it pretty well and as young adults make personal food choices now a nutritionist could admire. They don't need supervision in that regard. Hmmmm...why do YOU think that is? I've already mentioned my boys come home and tell me how GRATEFUL they are we don't eat like some of the kids/families at school they know. That I raised them to know something is inherently WRONG with having a milk shake and fries for lunch on a regular basis. Truthfully, white bread makes them CRINGE. <chuckle>

Call that an "eating disorder" if you want....
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 22, 2012, 05:55:18 AM
I wouldn't say being overweight is necessarily an eating disorder.  In a lot of cases it's probably poor dietary habits and poor food choices. 

I would never tell my daughters not to eat certain foods or how much because "they're going to get fat".  I wouldn't use those words because it kind of puts a slant on if one is fat, they're a "less than".   It has nothing to do with fragility.  It has a lot to do with a mental image of people who are fat.  There are a probably a small portion that are due to genetics (however I think it's MUCH smaller than people think), some who are due to medications (my friend ballooned on her cancer meds), etc.  And there probably are some that do have an eating disorder.  I want my children to look at these people and feel compassion for them.  Not, "You don't want to be that fat kid that everyone makes fun of."  It's the way I want my kids to view people who are heavy.  ETA some of their friends are fat.  But I don't want them to just see fat or look at them negatively because of their weight, and they don't.  They see their friends as people. 

It has nothing to do with mental toughness.  I don't mince words.  When my girls were growing up, I used to emphasize, "It's not about how thin you are, it's about how FIT you are!"  Battling those skinny minny pics of, for example, one of the Olsen girls who looked anorexic.  Or Angelina Jolie when she looked like skin and bone.  We would be in the checkout line and I would say, "That is NOT pretty.   All bones, ribs, there's nothing on them and it's not healthy.  There is no muscle mass.  Then we'd see the fitness mags like Health or Self (I think that's the name, used to get it in the mail) and I'd point out the muscle mass.  As in, "Look at those muscular arms.  Check out those abs.  They're fit!"  Fit and trim (note:  I did not say skinny or thin) is work.  It's healthy eating and working out to stay fit.

It's not just pointing this out and looking at magazines.  They're momma has always practiced what she preaches.  I have NEVER heard my daughters utter any phrase like this, "Mom, I need to go on a diet.  I think I'm fat."  Never.  I have told them as they entered their teen years that our family loves food.  Food is delicious.  But we also have a genetic tendency to eat too much.  The problem is, when you're growing up, if you grow out more than you're growing up, that is unhealthy.  We all have an optimum height and weight.  They know if they're growing out a bit too much, I'll let them know.  I know what they're optimum weight range should be.   We're all about the same size.

Only had to do that once with DD#2.  She was in 10th grade and gained almost 20 lbs in 5 mos.  She was second string field hockey one fall, did a lot of bench sitting, and field hockey players are known for their sh** food snacks.  LOADS of junk.  When I saw her weight on her physical in February, I almost went into shock lol.  I gently told her that there is no way she should weigh 153 for her frame size and height.  145 is tops if she's working out a lot with weights.  I told her I wanted her to clean up her eating habits, cut out the junk, and do a bit more cardio once June started.  It is that important to get things under control and not let weight spiral out of control.   She got it under control on her own.  She simply cut out the junk and dropped to about 138 by June.   

I warned DD#1 (and DD#2) about the "Freshman 15".  DD#1 came home last May about 20 lbs heavier.  DH noticed.  I noticed.  I told her she was lucky because she gains all over, but she was noticeably heavier.  Again, I said, "You want to get this under control.  If you don't pay attention to this weight gain, it will stay and just keep creeping up as you graduate and get a job."  Away from college, she ate healthy foods again, put her fitness workouts at the forefront again, and lost that weight.   (In my 12-week challenge thread in OT, yesterday I posted my "proud" pic of what she made with the mini grill I bought her at school :) .)

She looks terrific.  And if you've seen pics of her in the Craft thread, you know she's no skinny minny.  She's lean and solid muscle. 

But no, I've never told my kids not to eat junk because they're going to get fat.  Eat the right food and move so you stay fit.  It was always about good food choices.  Frequent poor food choices lead to an unfit body no matter what the weight.  Emphasizing fitness, muscle mass, and good eating, and realistic/optimum weight for their frame size has served my girls well.   They have never obsessed nor denied themselves food.  And as they're getting older, I see them gravitating toward clean eating and cutting out processed junk.  It's quite refreshing to see this.  They're way ahead of the game that where I was at at the same age.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 22, 2012, 06:06:45 AM
My kids get a chuckle out of milk choices, Ark.  We are a skim milk family, and always have been.  Most kids at their school are whole or 2% milk drinkers.  They think skim milk is gross!  My kids think whole or 2% is hard to drink, almost milkshake like and much prefer the easy drinking viscosity of skim milk.

Dietary habits start young I tell ya.  And the type of milk is the perfect example.  Grow up on skim and you'll love it.  Grow up with fatty milk and you'll probably have a hard time switching to skim.  Most of Ryan's friends won't touch skim milk.   
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: lakeswimr on February 22, 2012, 06:11:16 AM
I think that it doesn't take that much to mess up GIRLS with regard to body issues in this country.  I don't see too many women in this culture who I don't think have some amount of an eating disorder--not always a full fledged one but most seem to not be happy with their bodies and to be on a diet most of the time and have their feelings of self-worth tied very strongly to how they look and their weight.  I would want to try to avoid that if I had a girl.  It would be very difficult since most of society hyperfocuses on it and much of our country *is* overweight.

There is a big middle ground where one isn't telling a child 'you are going to get fat' and also is not overfeeding junk food to a child. 

Yes, I'm serious that I very strongly think telling a child, 'you are going to get fat and you are going to get a big butt' isn't good *long term*.  I would set limits on how much junk can be eaten.  My DS doesn't tend toward overeating so far.  When he says he is full I say, "great".  But if he does want more junk that appropriate I tend to say things like, 'I think you had enough sweets, don't you?  Let's have something healthy now.'  I say, 'those are just special treats, not full meals!  We just eat a little of them.'  I don't tell him he is gonna get fat.  I think that will set him up with thinking that fat people are inferior and later in life as with almost all of us, when it IS more difficult to remain slim it will make him feel worse, and likely make it HARDER to keep weight off.

I think teaching good habits and portion size and etc rather than talking about 'getting fat' will be more effective.  I can tell you that I only ate healthy foods growing up other than on holidays and birthdays.  My mother talked about this subject and the reason I feel the way I do is my parents talked the way you do.  It messed me up.  It messed my brothers up.   I read a lot on this topic and do not think telling kids they are going to get a 'big butt' and 'get fat' is helpful LONG TERM.  I think it is potentially planting seeds of a good eating disorder, particularly if your child does gain weight in late teens and early adulthood.  I don't think it will be helpful at that time to them.

I hope I"m wrong.  I hope it works for you.  Having an eating disorder stinks.  Being a woman in America who doesn't feel good about herself due to her weight isn't so good of a thing, either. 

I'm not saying I would take a hands off approach or a false approach with a child but that I wouldn't focus on the topic in a negative way.  I would teach about this in a positive way (focusing on what I want the child to do, not on what I don't want them to do.)

I think it is great that you are teaching them to eat other things than junk if they are hungry and I'm not in your house so I haven't heard any of these conversations and maybe if I were there I would have a very different opinion.  Internet doesn't always do a good job conveying what people mean.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: SilverLining on February 22, 2012, 06:17:58 AM
Getting back to this quote from the article:

Quote
Being set apart from peers by sitting in a different chair means "their peers recognize them as large, different," said Dr. Phil Wu, a pediatrician who leads Kaiser Permanente's pediatric obesity prevention and treatment effort.

"At all ages, kids don't want to feel different," Wu said. "They get ostracized by the peers in subtle and not-so-subtle ways. It's more of that social psychological impact that's insidious in a way that's more profound than what the child might experience than sitting in a standard seat."

My granddaughter is a teeny-tiny little girl.  She eats well, meaning she eats healthy meals, with large portions, and she also snacks between meals.  Sometimes sweets, sometimes fruits.  But she's also very active, and she is tiny.  If she takes after me (which she seems to) she will remain tiny all through school.

with "normal" chairs I often felt like I was in a chair that was to big...like a little kid playing grown up, kwim?   Making all the chairs bigger will make things worse for her and kids like her.  Kind of punishing her for being small.

I got teased a lot for being so small.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: SilverLining on February 22, 2012, 06:24:01 AM
Quote
Hmmmm....using that logic, I guess I shouldn't tell my kids that using street drugs can leave them brain damaged

I don't think that's a fair comparison.  Using street drugs is not a necessity like eating is.  And there isn't a healthy/safe/good amount of street drugs to use.

I think you also compared to label reading re: allergies.  That IS a fair comoarison imo, and it does sometimes result in eating disorders.  Having said that, I'll add it is necessary to enforce with kids, and an eating disorder resulting from allergies doesn't mean it's a parents fault.  I developed one when I developed my allergies and the only person to blame was ME!
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: lakeswimr on February 22, 2012, 06:34:15 AM
My eating disorder was a direct result of how I was parented and the society I grew up in.  My home was like a perfect environment if you wanted to cause a person to have an eating disorder.  I was not responsible for it as a CHILD.  As an adult I took responsibility and distanced myself from the things that triggered my problem and I got well.  I'm responsible for myself as an adult, no matter how I was parented as a child and how much or how little I got messed up in childhood but children are not responsible for causing themselves to have eating disorders.  Maybe somehow you were and if I heard your whole story I'd agree but in my case it was my parents , certainly and they produced 3 of us who were similarly messed up. 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 22, 2012, 06:51:22 AM
I grew up in a semi-restrictive food environment.  As the youngest of 4, my mother did some reading and threw out a lot of junk when I was in second grade.  Gone were the Twinkies in a flash.  My siblings got to each junk far longer than I did lol.  No junky cereals either.  It was plain Cheerios, Wheaties, Grapenuts, stuff like that.  You'd never see a Pop Tart in her cupboard.  Skim milk, lots of fruits and veggies all the time.  Her fruit bowl was always there. 

It used to make me mad.  I'd have a lunch of a sandwich, apple, banana, or orange, and two skinny little pretzels.  Nothing for snack.  My friends used to get loads of junk and things like Hostess cakes or Little Debbies for their snacks.  Boy, I sure wanted that junk, but my mom said it wasn't good for us and was unhealthy.  I grew up watching my parents play tennis, jog, and eventually join the gym when I was in high school.  These are the things that stay with kids for life.  I watched them model a healthy lifestyle. 

Every once and while we'd have junk.  We had our birthday cakes, cookies on special occasions, but they just weren't a mainstay.  Our snacks were usually popcorn, chips, or pretzels.  Eventually chips were only for special occasions because my mother wasn't sure if cottonseed oil was good for us back then and company's were starting to use that.  Sometimes I'd buy myself a special box of junk cereal from my own money.  It was nice to have that sometimes.  She didn't 'prevent us from eating crap foods, she just wouldn't buy it.

My kids have asked me why I never buy Pop Tarts or Little Debbies.  I laugh and ask them if they've ever seen a Pop Tart or Little Debbie cakes in Grandma's pantry lol.  No!  Some things are so junky I'll never buy them.  We really do grow up like our parents :) .   And here's something to think about.  My parents still go to the gym at least 3X/week and my mom still plays in her Tennis league the other two days.  They're doing pretty good at 75 and 76.  So I guess they were doing something right all along.   ETA, me, and all my siblings...as we've aged we've gotten more into health and fitness.   We all have similar figures to what we had in high school.  It's not genetics.  It's our attitude and early training.  We have all become our parents  ;D  .  Although my brother was a skinny fat and was diagnosed as a diabetic 3 years ago but has cleaned up his act.  He knew what to do, it just took him a little longer to get with the program with a diagnosis but now he's healthy like his three sisters :) .

It would pain me to think I'd ever say that as a teen lol!  I was to become my mother...
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: SilverLining on February 22, 2012, 07:01:07 AM
My eating disorder was a direct result of how I was parented and the society I grew up in.  My home was like a perfect environment if you wanted to cause a person to have an eating disorder.  I was not responsible for it as a CHILD.  As an adult I took responsibility and distanced myself from the things that triggered my problem and I got well.  I'm responsible for myself as an adult, no matter how I was parented as a child and how much or how little I got messed up in childhood but children are not responsible for causing themselves to have eating disorders.  Maybe somehow you were and if I heard your whole story I'd agree but in my case it was my parents , certainly and they produced 3 of us who were similarly messed up.

I was referring specifically about an eating disorder that results from the fears associated with food allergies.  And I was an adult when I developed my food allergies.

I do believe that specifically regarding food allergies a child can develop a fear of eating which morphs into an eating disorder, and it may not be the parents fault.  Of course, the parent needs to help the child, but I simply mean it may not be the parents fault that it started.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: lakeswimr on February 22, 2012, 07:40:19 AM
Oh, that makes sense.  :)
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 22, 2012, 07:55:21 AM
I wouldn't say being overweight is necessarily an eating disorder.  In a lot of cases it's probably poor dietary habits and poor food choices. 

my bad. I forgot. It's a "disease."

Quote
I would never tell my daughters not to eat certain foods or how much because "they're going to get fat".  I wouldn't use those words because it kind of puts a slant on if one is fat, they're a "less than".   

Aw....I take it you're not a Tiger Mom after all.  Neither is CM either, I guess. Posers! the both of you.  :P
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: notnutty on February 22, 2012, 08:28:10 AM
About 2 weeks ago I told my DS that he was getting "fat."  I used that word to get his attention.  His grandfather just passed because of diabetes and heart disease, his grandmother is diabetic (Type II from being overweight).  He needs to quit eating so many empty calories.  I don't buy the junk, but he is 16 with a car and the freedom that goes along with it.

Magically, over the past week he has been running on the treadmill and eating more fruit and veggies.  I see him with a water bottle instead of a soda (which I don't purchase).

I have always stressed eating in moderation.  If you are going to have some chips, put them in a bowl.  If we have pasta, I include veggies in the sauce.  We rarely have cookies, cakes, or processed in our house. 

Sometimes the truth needs to be told.  Bluntly if necessary. It probably depends on the age of the child and how severe the problem is.  Our house does not revolve around food or weight, but it is discussed as appropriate.  DS has always been big for his age.  He is currently 6'3 and around 235 pounds. Unfortunately his football coaches are excited that he has progressively been gaining weight.  He gets positive reinforcement for every 5 pounds he adds from the coaches.  Then he comes home to mom putting the breaks on.  Football is a temporary stage in his life.  Heart disease and diabetes are a reality he will have to contend with lifelong.

DD and younger DS have the opposite issues.  They don't eat enough.  Same house, same rules, same food environment.  I often worry that DD is not eating enough (especially since she does not live at home and is an adult).  Younger DS is 11 and is weight is around 65 lbs.  Small guy.

Anyway, I think there is no black and white rule when it comes to teaching our children about food choices.  It depends on body type and the child's own relationship with food.

 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 22, 2012, 08:35:50 AM

 I wouldn't use those words because it kind of puts a slant on if one is fat, they're a "less than".

You are the person that is measuring every cm and counting down to bikini season, right? "Hot Mama" on the a** of your jeans? Or is some other person posting under your alias?  :insane: Hey, at least I'm not sending mixed messages. My kids know they can take me at face value. No hidden meanings.

I have to ask....have you ever been fat? Like in rolls of it around your knees?


fwiw, My daughter's teachers commented on her IEP that she not only values her friendships but is willing to make personal sacrifices for them. Put that in your blueberry cookies and chomp on it.  ;D

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 22, 2012, 08:57:11 AM


Sometimes the truth needs to be told.  Bluntly if necessary. It probably depends on the age of the child and how severe the problem is.

Honesty is a good rule of thumb where parenting is concerned.

I think rabid political correctness really screws up raising kids. My daughter *IS*  self conscious at age 5. I've posted about her tears related to her eczema, particularly around her face. She's a compassionate child, and no doubt, our own personal miseries make us more compassionate, (although she's an empath to begin with), not whether or not our parents tell us too many cupcakes will make us fat.

Anyways, I guess we can't post about how CUPCAKE QUEENS are contributing to making kids FATTER in schools?  Because it might give kids a self image issue or make them mean....

In her lunch today will be half a turkey sandwich, one elmo bottled water, one heart shaped pink frosted sugar cookie, and some sweet potato chips. I know, deep in her heart, her only dissapointment will be she's not allowed to break her cookie in two to share. And with that, I can empathize a tad with the cupcake queens. Feel some compassion for them, knowing it's our basic human nature to share food, particularly, THE BEST we feel we have to offer with people IMPORTANT to us.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: lakeswimr on February 22, 2012, 09:10:23 AM

 
You are the person that is measuring every cm and counting down to bikini season, right? "Hot Mama" on the a** of your jeans? Or is some other person posting under your alias?  :insane: Hey, at least I'm not sending mixed messages. My kids know they can take me at face value. No hidden meanings.

I have to ask....have you ever been fat? Like in rolls of it around your knees?

No, I'm not that person.  I don't know what you are talking about.  I can not measure every cm and it is only in the past few years I can stand to weigh myself.  I know how big I am from what clothing size I wear and how I look.  In the past if I thought of calories, pounds, inches or whatever it would trigger for me similar feelings I had when I had an eating disorder.  I couldn't do it.  I don't send my son 'mixed messages'.  He knows I'm focused on fitness and health, I like to eat healthy foods, I don't eat much in the way of junk food and I exercise often. 

I have been about 35-40 lbs over my ideal weight.  (shrug)  I have also had an EATING disorder.  I have been both someone who didn't eat almost at all as well as the other end of the spectrum along with vomiting and the whole shebang.  I haven't been doing either in over 20 years and plan to stay this way by continuing to NOT focus on FAT.  That just gets ME into trouble.  YMMV. 

What initially triggered my eating disorder was my grandfather poked me in the stomach and called me fat when I was in 3rd grade.  He said it in a very negative way.  I didn't eat much the next year.  From 3rd grade to 4th grade I didn't gain one single pound and didn't grow much because I essentially stopped eating.  From them on I was very thin until college when I had access to all the junk food I wanted for the first time in my life.  I couldn't handle that freedom as I hadn't been given it before.   

In my case a single comment really did me in.  Continued daily comments from my parents made things much worse.  I would not discount the effect of calling a child fat in this culture.

It isn't about being honest or dishonest.  it is about what works and what doesn't.  If calling people fat worked there wouldn't be any fat people in America.  What people who are overweight tend to say is that when people call them fat it makes them binge eat or sabotages their efforts to lose weight.  It might work for some.  I find a focus on being healthy, eating healthy foods, exercise, reasonable portion size, stopping eating not when full but when about 80 or 90% full, etc is much more effective for ME.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: lakeswimr on February 22, 2012, 09:11:51 AM
And what was that about 'hot mama' on the a** of my jeans?  ???  Even when I was a show off in high school I woudln't have worn anything with writing on my butt.  I'm not a bikini person, either.  (shrug)

Are you seriously thinking of someone here who posts about this stuff or are you making this stuff up? 

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 22, 2012, 09:26:36 AM
And what was that about 'hot mama' on the a** of my jeans?  ???  Even when I was a show off in high school I woudln't have worn anything with writing on my butt.  I'm not a bikini person, either.  (shrug)

Are you seriously thinking of someone here who posts about this stuff or are you making this stuff up?

um...lakeswimmer...you've misquoted a bunch of stuff. go back and look. I quoted kk, not you, and somehow you mixed up what looks like your reply to me and attributed my post to kk....
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 22, 2012, 09:29:17 AM
My kids get a chuckle out of milk choices, Ark.  We are a skim milk family, and always have been.  Most kids at their school are whole or 2% milk drinkers.  They think skim milk is gross!  My kids think whole or 2% is hard to drink, almost milkshake like and much prefer the easy drinking viscosity of skim milk.

Dietary habits start young I tell ya.  And the type of milk is the perfect example.  Grow up on skim and you'll love it.  Grow up with fatty milk and you'll probably have a hard time switching to skim.  Most of Ryan's friends won't touch skim milk.   

I grew up on 2%, went skim as an adult, then to whole when my kids were on a bottle, and then back to 2% now. They don't notice, but none of us are big glass of milk drinkers, and we use it in coffee and on cereal and to cook with. <shrug> I *do* buy organic, and get the DHA+ OMEGA 3.  ;D that's my criteria.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 22, 2012, 09:41:49 AM

 I wouldn't use those words because it kind of puts a slant on if one is fat, they're a "less than".

You are the person that is measuring every cm and counting down to bikini season, right? "Hot Mama" on the a** of your jeans? Or is some other person posting under your alias?  :insane: Hey, at least I'm not sending mixed messages. My kids know they can take me at face value. No hidden meanings.

I have to ask....have you ever been fat? Like in rolls of it around your knees?

fwiw, My daughter's teachers commented on her IEP that she not only values her friendships but is willing to make personal sacrifices for them. Put that in your blueberry cookies and chomp on it.  ;D

Yes, but not because I want to be, ack..."skinny".  I loathe that word.  Yes, it feels terrific to wear a hot swimsuit and feel my husband's eye's glazing over me ;) .  He'd do that anyway though.  My two reasons:  HBP and diabetes.  Yes, I am carefully measuring my portions now.  Why?  Because what I've been doing for years, although it was healthy eating, was simply not healthy enough.  Adding 2 1/2" to my waistline between the ages of 42 and 45.  As in a moderate risk waist-to-hip ratio.  Yikes.  Apple shape.  That is my genetic tendency.  I want results!  Damn I do.  As in excellent blood test results which have always been good, but I want to keep them that way. 

Have I ever been fat?  My junior year in high school, I was called chunky by my husband's friend.  He said nothing to deny it.  It was one reason why I bought my first set of weights, started jogging, cut out junk food, and bough Jane Fonda's Workout book.  Slimmed down my Senior year to a shapely 118.    Went to college, unwarned about the Freshman 15.  Drank like a fish, munched, ate junk, no portion sizing, and ballooned from 118 to 153.  That's what I weighed the first day I was back home from my Freshman year.  Yes, I was FAT!  35 lbs. on my frame size!?!?   I worked like a dog that summer to slim down.

I'm no stranger to working at keeping my weight stable.  In fact, if anything, it has helped me.  I've been working at it since 17 years of age. 

Rolls of fat around my knees?  Don't need those rolls to be fat.  I don't get fat legs lol.  A dangerously fat midsection yes.  Obesity IS a disease.  What is the cause of the disease?  It could any one of several things.  Like a result of mental, physical, or sexual abuse.  People seek out food for comfort.  And then they become fat.  But I'm not going to tell my girls, "You don't want to be fat, do you?"  And especially not, "You don't want to be fat like so-and-so, do you?"  Because what is the opposite of fat?  It is skinny.  And I don't want my girls to be skinny either.  I want them to be slim, trim, and fit.  There IS a difference.  Gotta have meat on them bones, you know?  And on the subject of so-and-so, we don't know why that person is fat.  Are they having some type of serious issues going on that we don't 'know about? 

Obesity is a disease.  It is a struggle.  It is hard for some to manage their weight.  It is a national crisis that isn't being addressed like it should be IMO.  I can't imagine telling my daughters when they were young, "You don't want to be fat, do you?"  Really, who wants to be?  I want to emphasize what they SHOULD be, not what to avoid.  They should be fit.  And if they're fit and place a premium on healthy behaviors as a permanent lifestyle, they're going to be a hot mama like me ;) .   (One of my softball shirts does proclaim I'm a "Hot Mom", and it was embroidered to say that because my husband told me to put it on  ;D. !)  I take pride in myself and my health.  They do too.  And maybe I will put Hot Mama on the a** of my jeans.  Not a bad idea.  I'll probably get requests to make some for my friends lol. 

What do I say to my daughters now at 20 and almost 18?  "Look at those girls!"  (The ones walking out of the high school and are already heavy.)  They are going to have a tough time of it in life.  If they're heavy now and don't develop good eating and fitness habits, they're probably going to be doomed as adults.  They have a very hard road ahead of them.  It's the truth.  They know how I feel about childhood obesity.  And the thing is, it is becoming more of a social norm to be overweight at a young age.  I see it in our schools.  There is no need to say, "Hey DD#2, if you don't eat right you're going to be fat like her!"  They intelligent.  They know what's going on.  It's better, IMO, to emphasize long-term consequences at their age. 

There are no mixed messages in my house:  Fitness and healthy eating rules.  It has always been that way.  And my daughters have graduated into healthy eaters that don't count calories (never did), never weighed themselves regularly (because I don't believe in owning a scale), never proclaimed they need to diet to lose weight because they felt they were fat, and put working out near the top of their daily schedule.

One of my cherished memories.  I remember when they used to wave and smile at me from the gym playroom as toddlers.   They would watch me do the circuit out the big glass window.  (If they grew up thinking all moms work out, who am I to dispute that thought :) .)  They used to say, "I can't wait until I'm 13 and can work out too, Mom!"  And then they did.  My husband thinks it's heartwarming like I do when all 6 of us head to the gym to work out on Friday nights during the holidays.  The way I always imagined it to be :) .  I get chills just thinking about it.  I'm seeing more parents doing Family memberships lately too.  What a great thing that is happening.   My kids get to work out and see their friends in a fitness-oriented environment.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: lakeswimr on February 22, 2012, 10:05:55 AM
Oh, I see.  I was wondering! 

And what was that about 'hot mama' on the a** of my jeans?  ???  Even when I was a show off in high school I woudln't have worn anything with writing on my butt.  I'm not a bikini person, either.  (shrug)

Are you seriously thinking of someone here who posts about this stuff or are you making this stuff up?

um...lakeswimmer...you've misquoted a bunch of stuff. go back and look. I quoted kk, not you, and somehow you mixed up what looks like your reply to me and attributed my post to kk....
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 22, 2012, 10:16:29 AM
kk....i dont have A CLUE as to why my husband tells me MY body turns him on. Im certainly not in the best physical shape of my life. I cant get near him without being molested.....lol!

His favorite line is :  "You could be any shape you want to. You don't have a Butterface."
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 22, 2012, 11:01:35 AM
I think that it doesn't take that much to mess up GIRLS with regard to body issues in this country.  I don't see too many women in this culture who I don't think have some amount of an eating disorder--not always a full fledged one but most seem to not be happy with their bodies and to be on a diet most of the time and have their feelings of self-worth tied very strongly to how they look and their weight.  I would want to try to avoid that if I had a girl.  It would be very difficult since most of society hyperfocuses on it and much of our country *is* overweight.
<snip>
I think it is great that you are teaching them to eat other things than junk if they are hungry and I'm not in your house so I haven't heard any of these conversations and maybe if I were there I would have a very different opinion.  Internet doesn't always do a good job conveying what people mean.


Yes, this.  Girls really do face cultural context there that boys... just.... don't.

I saw that-- on both sides-- as a teen.  I looked like a damned Barbie doll as a teen, and it was pretty much effortless on my part-- I just had the right physique and my eating habits were profoundly NON-disordered at that point in time.

 My best friend, well, she was "fat."  I've discussed that one.  My other two friends (also close friends) were; a) late bloomer who was tiny tiny tiny, and b) anorexic. Friend a) was desperate to gain enough weight so that she'd be heavy enough for military service.  She ate a huge 1 lb bag of peanut m&m's weekly as a 'snack' out of her locker.  (She became an air force dentist, btw.  LOL)

Friend b)?  A loving and well-meaning mom who had cautioned her about "being fat" since her family had tendencies this direction.  Hey, it worked fine on her four older brothers.  Her parents couldn't understand why it had backfired with their youngest.   :-[

  Not kidding. 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 22, 2012, 11:17:03 AM
kk....i dont have A CLUE as to why my husband tells me MY body turns him on. Im certainly not in the best physical shape of my life. I cant get near him without being molested.....lol!

His favorite line is :  "You could be any shape you want to. You don't have a Butterface."

Duh!  ;)  You're a hot mom!  Hotness is an attitude thing, not really a figure issue lol.  Perfect example.  Queen Latifah.  Sexy and hot.   ETA, he swoons when he gazes into your blue eyes, yes?

Said tongue-in-cheek...I just advertise that I'm hot when I'm not, until people actually believe it.  Suckers...
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 22, 2012, 11:25:10 AM
Quote
Friend b)?  A loving and well-meaning mom who had cautioned her about "being fat" since her family had tendencies this direction.  Hey, it worked fine on her four older brothers.  Her parents couldn't understand why it had backfired with their youngest.

Seriously, you want to know what had a HUGE impact on me?  After my grandmother's diagnosis of diabetes when I was 16, she lost a ton of weight with a sound program for an RD, but...every time we'd go to visit, she show me her orange.  And her insulin syringe.  She'd explain to me how she learned what to do with her orange and how she had to stick herself multiple times a day as well as checking her blood sugar.  She was meticulous about it and very regimented.  Blood pressure device sat on her bathroom counter as well.

What she didn't do had nothing to do with food.  She didn't like the side effects of her glaucoma meds.  Didn't take them, didn't tell the doc.  She eventually died with very little vision.  What a shame.  There were other meds to try but she was taking so many at the time I think it bothered her. 

Her situation left quite an impression on me.  Whatever I can do to avoid the diagnosis of HBP and diabetes, I will do.   

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 22, 2012, 11:28:48 AM
I think that it doesn't take that much to mess up GIRLS with regard to body issues in this country.  I don't see too many women in this culture who I don't think have some amount of an eating disorder--not always a full fledged one but most seem to not be happy with their bodies and to be on a diet most of the time and have their feelings of self-worth tied very strongly to how they look and their weight.  I would want to try to avoid that if I had a girl.  It would be very difficult since most of society hyperfocuses on it and much of our country *is* overweight.
<snip>
I think it is great that you are teaching them to eat other things than junk if they are hungry and I'm not in your house so I haven't heard any of these conversations and maybe if I were there I would have a very different opinion.  Internet doesn't always do a good job conveying what people mean.


Yes, this.  Girls really do face cultural context there that boys... just.... don't.

I saw that-- on both sides-- as a teen.  I looked like a damned Barbie doll as a teen, and it was pretty much effortless on my part-- I just had the right physique and my eating habits were profoundly NON-disordered at that point in time.

 My best friend, well, she was "fat."  I've discussed that one.  My other two friends (also close friends) were; a) late bloomer who was tiny tiny tiny, and b) anorexic. Friend a) was desperate to gain enough weight so that she'd be heavy enough for military service.  She ate a huge 1 lb bag of peanut m&m's weekly as a 'snack' out of her locker.  (She became an air force dentist, btw.  LOL)

Friend b)?  A loving and well-meaning mom who had cautioned her about "being fat" since her family had tendencies this direction.  Hey, it worked fine on her four older brothers.  Her parents couldn't understand why it had backfired with their youngest.   :-[

  Not kidding.

Food for thought:  My parents NEVER made food an issue. But I developed "anorexia" (what they termed my weight dropping to 84 lbs)  regardless. I think what truly played into that was being an oversheltered child and everything that goes with that, including being the oddity among my peers and a bit of a freak to them in that regard. Everything I did, my parents were there...watching. over my shoulder. Always overdressed, over protected, and over regarded, in the sense things were expected of me that I truly wasn't prepared to deliver, and probably in part due to the overprotection. It's a vicious cycle.  I was, to a point, the ideal child. I never fought with them, never disobeyed, hung out with them, and was....enmeshed. God bless them, I loved and still love my parents, but then again, I'm not the rebellious in your face type.   ;D thank goodness, or my parentectomy could have come in the form of drug abuse, oversexuality, or other risk taking behavior.

But really. Enmeshment. Psychosomatic family. Ironically, despite it's symbiotic nature, enmeshed families rarely see the storm coming, but come it will.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 22, 2012, 11:36:15 AM
???


Not sure what that had to do with either of my friends who certainly were not enmeshed with parents.

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 22, 2012, 11:49:26 AM
kk....i dont have A CLUE as to why my husband tells me MY body turns him on. Im certainly not in the best physical shape of my life. I cant get near him without being molested.....lol!

His favorite line is :  "You could be any shape you want to. You don't have a Butterface."

Duh!  ;)  You're a hot mom!  Hotness is an attitude thing, not really a figure issue lol.  Perfect example.  Queen Latifah.  Sexy and hot.   ETA, he swoons when he gazes into your blue eyes, yes?

Said tongue-in-cheek...I just advertise that I'm hot when I'm not, until people actually believe it.  Suckers...

Hon, I'm don't take offense with your jeans, just your denial that you have a preoccupation with size.  ;) I'd look rockin' at  125 lbs.  However, when I am at that weight, I'm sick...sick...sick...all the time. shingles, viruses, emotional, etc....I can turn "on" an "eating disorder" easily and be that weight within...(realistically) two months. It's not that important to me, however. But, having been through the gauntlet of obesity during my most tender years, I'll be blunt and honest with my daughters. I guess it's all in the context of parenting and home life. You can't live in this house and not feel loved. It's impossible. I don't think it's that fragile a relationship that my daughters are going to base all they are <hand on hip, whipping arm in circular motion> on whether I tell them overeating junk foods will make their butt big.

Little story:  the HEAD COLD FROM HELL went through my house this month. Three neb machines going at once. (had to run out at 2am in an ice storm to get neb cups and had to buy a third machine to get the only cups at a 24 hour pharmacy within 25 miles)

Egads. me and my daughter were so miserable. I tucked her in and she wanted a kiss. I didn't feel right kissing her with my cootified face, and the conversation went like this:

"I want a kiss goodnight"

"Oh, honey, mommy is sick."

"but I'm sick too..."

<kiss on the head>

"no...on the mouth."

"but you'll get my germs..."

"I have the same germs."

"but mommy's face is all gross"

"Mine is gross too."

<Huge snotty exchange of germs>

I just don't worry about every word out of my mouth. I have more faith in our family and values than that.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 22, 2012, 01:06:18 PM
???


Not sure what that had to do with either of my friends who certainly were not enmeshed with parents.


but i think more than telling my daughter too much junk food will make her fat (and offering her a clementine instead), enmeshment (parental overinvolvment) IS a good predictor of who will develop an eating disorder.

Actually, parental overinvolvement and abject apathy possibly related to parents fullfiling their own desires regardless of their child's predisposition and interest might be the toxic combo. My parents surely benefited from the reduced stress of not having to deal with a child who had a social life might have created. I don't blame them though, still love them dearly, and hey, there probably was a sensory/anxiety component in there somewhere. I mean, a parent's need for stress reduction shouldn't supercede their own child's need for eventual autonomy. That is something even *I* have taken great strides coming to grips with.  Smotherlove, yk?

I must be Mufasa. Not to repeat the mistakes of the past...

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/ans/psychology/health_psychology/famstruc.htm

Add fiery tempers and obstinate dispositions on either side, and even I shudder. I was docile, and my concern for my parents distress over my condition took precedence over taking charge. I dealt with my need for autonomy from a more rational standpoint. Putting someone else's needs above our own is ALWAYS "autonomy".  Greatest form of it I know. Call it an epiphany.

Eating disorders aren't about self image as much as they are about autonomy and how THAT affects self image. Intelligent persons probably having a greater NEED for autonomy than those of average intelligence. It's probably something of the emotional equivallent of Starling's Law.

http://www.livestrong.com/article/241262-eating-disorders-family-dynamics/








Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 22, 2012, 01:16:06 PM
"Overprotective parenting" may damage a child's brain and lead to mental illness:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18633-mom-and-dad-stop-stifling-me--its-damaging-my-brain.html
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 22, 2012, 01:17:23 PM
so it leads me to wonder what type of triangulation there is between food allergies/eating disorders/parenting style.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 22, 2012, 01:48:08 PM
Oh, I see.

Yes, I do think that "disordered" eating is a result of using food (or control of it) as a surrogate for something else.  Definitely.

It may be poor parenting.  It was in one of the two instances that I witnessed at close enough range to have a lot of the backstory on, and certainly was a factor in my DH's (and his DB's) disordered eating... and, not surprisingly, a factor in my MIL's disordered food = love eating, too. 

But in the other instance, it was probably what the outside world would call EXCEPTIONAL parenting (and loving, religiously grounded, supportive-but-not-overinvolved parenting, to boot)...  the only problem was that the young woman in question was primed by expectations of pious perfection that no real person could live up to all of the time, and she was living her life petrified that they'd "find out" that she wasn't that perfect (that smart, that nice, that faithful, etc. etc.).  The "fat" comments simply gave her another unrealistic expectation to fixate on meeting, and so she did.  Seriously, her parents were SO proud of her... and couldn't understand what on earth went so wrong with her in high school.   :-[  She was killing herself and they truly had no idea why.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 22, 2012, 02:06:38 PM
Quote
Hon, I'm don't take offense with your jeans, just your denial that you have a preoccupation with size. 

I wouldn't say it's a preoccupation with size, but it IS important!  It should be important.  (Weight, no.  It's kind of an irrelevant number that is merely a gauge.)  Because I know what size I *should* be, and I want to keep it that way.  If we, speaking generally, are going to settle for weight gain as we get older, fine.  I'm just not going to.  It doesn't have to be that way.  Literally, my life may depend on that.

Just like I know what size my daughters should be.  If they're out of the acceptable range given their frame size, they should do something about it now.  They're health depends on it too.

Now if you say I have a preoccupation with fitness and healthy eating, you're right on target.

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 22, 2012, 02:10:17 PM
I think many girls who are susceptible to eating disorders probably suffer from low self esteem.  That can cause a myriad of problems. 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 22, 2012, 02:13:04 PM
People with preoccupation with size:   a lot of top models and actresses.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: lakeswimr on February 22, 2012, 02:23:41 PM
I think many girls who are susceptible to eating disorders probably suffer from low self esteem.  That can cause a myriad of problems.

I think many girls suffer from low self esteem.  (shrug)
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: lakeswimr on February 22, 2012, 02:24:45 PM
People with preoccupation with size:   a lot of top models and actresses.

Among people I know I'd put it at about well over 90% of women who have a preoccupation with size to at least some degree-many to a very high degree.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 22, 2012, 03:04:14 PM
People with preoccupation with size:   a lot of top models and actresses.

Among people I know I'd put it at about well over 90% of women who have a preoccupation with size to at least some degree-many to a very high degree.

Part of the media onslaught of super skinny images, I'm sure.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Carefulmom on February 22, 2012, 08:19:28 PM
The media really portrays women so inaccurately.  I am so sick of looking at anorexic women who get breast implants.  I constantly tell dd that these women have had surgery.  Breasts are body fat (in teenage girls or young women who have not had children).  If you have no fat on your body and you have a large amount of fat in your breasts, it usually isn`t real.  I think a lot of people see these models and don`t realize all they have had done.  Every time I see someone on TV or in a movie who has had their lips done or their back teeth pulled to make their face look thinner, I comment on it to dd.  The old and new Rachel McAdams, old and new Jennifer Garner, Faith Hill.  I always tell dd that these people looked so much better before their plastic surgery.  I think that the pressure to be thin is so much more now than when we were kids.

Dd said something to me the other day that really surprised me and I think I know my kid really well.  Some of you may remember that a few years ago dd had very delayed growth.  She was really tiny.  At 13, she was about the size of a ten year old and had no signs of puberty.  She had a zillion tests done and all was normal.  I decided it was due to the milk allergy and a family history on her dad`s side of very late growers.  Her BMI was so low that she almost failed the BMI test in PE, which is usually done to detect the kids with high BMI.  The pediatrician and the pediatric endocrinologist wanted me to put her on Growth Hormone.  I went back and forth over this for a year or so until I absolutely had to decide.  My gut really told me that dd was a very late grower, so she and I decided no Growth Hormone.  She eventually hit puberty and finally got into a size 00 and then a 0 and then recently she fit into a size 1.  This was so exciting for both of us.  She hit 5 feet 2 1/2, so I am glad I did not put her on Growth Hormone.  So she is finally starting to look like a normal kid.  She hated being tiny.  She hated people constantly thinking she is much younger than she is.  She hated shopping for a dress for graduation from middle school and everyone kept asking if she was graduating elementary school.  So finally at 16 1/2 she looks like a slender but not emaciated 15 year old.  She looks good.  So I said to her the other night that she really doesn`t look all that thin any more.  In the context of the above, that was a compliment.  She looked at me, not happy,and said (saracastically) "Well, thanks a lot!"  I was floored.  I said that was a compliment, because it had bothered her so much to look so young and be so tiny.  I could not believe that she took it as a negative comment.  This could not possibly be due to her upbringing, since she saw a nutritionist to increase her calories and the doctors kept telling her to gain weight.  It really just shows what society has done, and how it can make girls (and maybe boys) really sensitive to comments about weight.  And I am guessing she must hear a lot from her friends that they are worried about their weight.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 22, 2012, 08:43:02 PM
We've had similarly surreal moments with DD, Carefulmom.  She, likewise, is extremely slender (now 5'2" and barely topping 93lbs at age 13).  You'd think that being finally into "real" jeans sizes ( 1's-- as opposed to those slim 00's which barely even EXIST...) would have made her happy.  But noooooo.

It's wild.   :insane:

I'm probably one of the few people on the planet that has ever naturally worn a size 28F or 28G bra.  We do exist without silicone.  Even so, most of that look is NOT natural, particularly in women who also have no other curves. 

I'm hoping that DD doesn't share that particular set of genes with me, fwiw.   :hiding: 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 22, 2012, 10:05:40 PM
well, for those children who are COMPLETELY filling out a 7/8 at age 5, or for whom 130's in Hanna's barely fit, then here's your dose of reality:  You are in the absolute MINORITY. Most kids my daughter's size will always get eyerolls when asking for their size in a dress and trust me, it's always some 5 foot something doint the finding, who wouldn't understand, that no, a size 10/12 in your teen years doesn't mean you're F. A. T.

Carefulmom, even the PEDIATRICIANS in the group we see are always calculating out their BMI, and failing to believe despite a "normal" BMI,  I don't need to somehow CURB their growth. Yeah, whatever. It's not just the media, it's our healthcare providers too. They get caught up on a female who is 59 lbs at 5 years. Went through the same bs with my older son, and his bmi is "normal" as well. On the higher end, at 23.3, but looking at him, he is very thin. Teachers comment ALL the time on how THIN he is since 8th grade, and he wasn't at ALL fat then, either. Those long limbs and long torso suck up every bit of his 200 pounds (hes lost a bit since school started. probably 8 pounds.)

but my older daugher: i weighed her tonight and took her height. Looks like she put on 2 pounds, but two inches as well. :


according to the bmi calculator:


Code: [Select]
A 5 year and 10 month old (female) child who is 59.0 pounds and 4 feet and 2 inches tall, has a body mass index of 16.6, which is at the 80.2th percentile and is considered to be a healthy weight.
now, what surprised me is that my four year old is the same bmi (she's my "plump" child. a little chesty and with some boo-tay) I was expecting more along the lines of 20's for BMI. :

Quote
A 4 year old (female) child
who is 44 pounds
and is 3 feet and 7 inches tall has
a body mass index of 16.8,
which is at the 84th percentile,

and would indicate that your child is at a healthy weight. Keep in mind that it is still possible for a child to have an eating disorder even if they are at a healthy weight though.


Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: rainbow on February 23, 2012, 08:43:26 AM
This has some relevance to the discussion:

Savannah Hardin, 9, is seen in this image released by Etowah County Board of Education on February 22, 2012. Two Alabama women were accused of murder on Wednesday for allegedly killing a young girl by forcing her to run for three hours without stopping, authorities said. The running was apparently a punishment for Savannah Hardin, 9, who died on Monday.

http://news.yahoo.com/2-charged-death-ala-girl-forced-run-082216169.html
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 23, 2012, 09:38:01 AM
This has some relevance to the discussion:

Savannah Hardin, 9, is seen in this image released by Etowah County Board of Education on February 22, 2012. Two Alabama women were accused of murder on Wednesday for allegedly killing a young girl by forcing her to run for three hours without stopping, authorities said. The running was apparently a punishment for Savannah Hardin, 9, who died on Monday.

[url]http://news.yahoo.com/2-charged-death-ala-girl-forced-run-082216169.html[/url]


I so believe in the death penatly. I believe in overcrowded, hot filthy womens prisons filled with oversexed amazons.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Mfamom on February 23, 2012, 10:36:14 AM
well, we had an issue with the BMI index when ds went for his 10 or 11 year checkup.  He was considered obese on the chart for his age, weight and height.  Meantime, he is very lean and muscular (has always been naturally muscular) and muscle weighs a whole lot more than fat which is apparently what skewed the chart numbers.

It was a horrible thing.  It didn't help that the dr didn't look at him before declaring him obsese.  He was already a lot bigger than his peers (height wise) and he was really self conscious about it for some time  asking me if he is really fat. 

He was the furtherst thing from obese!  Very much in shape, low pulse because he's active. 

right now, he is struggling with everyone asking him how much h bench presses, but he's never lifted weights.  little comments about 'roids etc but he seems to take it in stride.


Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Mfamom on February 23, 2012, 11:04:39 AM
i think it was his 11 year check up .  in his book it says he was 5'7" 137lbs. 

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 23, 2012, 11:32:10 AM
Funny.  That's what I weighed when I graduated from college, Mfamom.  I was definitely NOT "obese."

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 23, 2012, 11:54:28 AM
2 days in a row out doing errands and saw 2 small girls about 3 or 4 obviously too plump and overweight.  That's what kills me.  A former male friend of mine has a daughter now in 1st grade.  Last year she was 130 lbs as a 5-year old in Kindergarten.  No, she is not tall AND I knew her when she was a year old and of an almost normal weight.  Slightly heavier than average, but that's it.  She is short to average in height.

Now think about it.  We had a little girl in Kindergarten who weighs more than me!  Do I think the parents are neglectful based upon what I knew and saw?  Yes, I do.  The older sister of this girl weighed about 180 last year as a 6th grader at about 5'2".   And they're son as a 4th grader weighed more than Ryan who was in 8th grade.   Their personal lives were a mess, the kids were somewhat ignored, and they had to deal with hurtful comments from kids in school.  And the father says, "Oh, it doesn't bother her (his oldest).  She's tough." 

Yeah, her tears went ignored.  Both parents look the other way as far as health issues with their kids (not just weight).  This is extreme, but it bothers me still.  The hurtful comments and looks they get from their peers, I just hate thinking about it when something could be done.  Bigger desks?  Gosh, talk about them feeling different even more.  Bigger desks for tall kids, yes, but bigger desks for heavy kids?  Isn't that like pointing out the obvious.  I don't 'know what is worse.  The stigma of the bigger desk or the embarrassment of trying to get out of a smaller one.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: kouturekat on February 23, 2012, 11:58:42 AM
Yeah, BMI's for athletes can produce bogus BMI scores.  Tools.  Merely tools.   

Vision is a pretty good tool also :) .
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Mfamom on February 23, 2012, 12:24:33 PM
Yeah, BMI's for athletes can produce bogus BMI scores.  Tools.  Merely tools.   

Vision is a pretty good tool also :) .

lol yes.  i remember when dr said it, his back was to ds
I said OMG LOOK at him!  He doesn't have any fat!! 
Then, he tried to justify his "mistake" by saying, I'm just saying, he gained 22 pounds each of the past two years.  You want to be careful.   ~)
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 23, 2012, 02:19:02 PM
i think it was his 11 year check up .  in his book it says he was 5'7" 137lbs.

my daughter will probably be close to those numbers.

in sixth grade my older son was probably 175- 180 pounds. he really thinned out his freshman year . at one point he was around 217. 8th grade??
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: TabiCat on February 23, 2012, 03:49:22 PM
So here is food for thaught. Both of my kids fall well within normal on the charts fairly balanced for height and weight. NOT very high on height and low on weight. So why inorder to find pants long enough I have to buy adjustable SLIMS. If they are average healthy weight for height wouldn't ADVERAGE clothes be the closest fit?

They don't look tall and over slim. They are by no means chubby but don't look SLIM.
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Mfamom on February 23, 2012, 03:57:01 PM
i think it was his 11 year check up .  in his book it says he was 5'7" 137lbs.

my daughter will probably be close to those numbers.

in sixth grade my older son was probably 175- 180 pounds. he really thinned out his freshman year . at one point he was around 217. 8th grade??

He's slowed waaaay down.  He is about 5'11" and 165--170.  start of bb season, he was a bit over 170 but he runs a lot for bb and has zero fat. 
I am hoping for another growth spurt to get him over that 6' mark.  he is still quite a bit taller than his peers.  definitely has a different body type.  He looks like he lifts regularly but doesnt. 
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: CMdeux on February 23, 2012, 04:06:24 PM
So here is food for thaught. Both of my kids fall well within normal on the charts fairly balanced for height and weight. NOT very high on height and low on weight. So why inorder to find pants long enough I have to buy adjustable SLIMS. If they are average healthy weight for height wouldn't ADVERAGE clothes be the closest fit?

They don't look tall and over slim. They are by no means chubby but don't look SLIM.

I don't know the answer, Tabi, but I strongly suspect that clothing manufacturers have adjusted sizing.  Truly.

DD has worn clothing that was mine as a child-- and it fits her fine.

I was NOT a 'skinny' child, and my physical type was "sturdy" rather than delicate.  No, not 'fat' but muscular. Like a gymnast, which I was for a while.

I distinctly recall "regular" sizing occasionally being too snug in my thighs as a kid.  Now, though, even "slim" sizes can truly HANG on my DD.  Now, maybe she really does have a radically different physique than mine, but her development and wearing of select clothing that my mom had saved from my own childhood, and her height at different ages would argue that it's not that different.

For the past 5 years, the only pants that fit her are, as you noted, adjustable waist slims-- anything that is NOT 'slim' simply falls off of her or is about 4-6" too short.   :insane:



Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Arkadia on February 23, 2012, 08:48:26 PM
i think it was his 11 year check up .  in his book it says he was 5'7" 137lbs.


my daughter will probably be close to those numbers.

in sixth grade my older son was probably 175- 180 pounds. he really thinned out his freshman year . at one point he was around 217. 8th grade??


He's slowed waaaay down.  He is about 5'11" and 165--170.  start of bb season, he was a bit over 170 but he runs a lot for bb and has zero fat. 
I am hoping for another growth spurt to get him over that 6' mark.  he is still quite a bit taller than his peers.  definitely has a different body type.  He looks like he lifts regularly but doesnt.


My son doesn't look like he "lifts regularly", just looks like someone you wouldn't want to.  ;D

He greets you with a friendly pat on the back, and I have to remind him that his "gentle" pat still knocks the wind out of you. It smarts.  Actually, no, it sends a shock right through me if I'm not ready for it.   :) Can't wait to see the "pat" he gives his little sister's first boyfriend.  :evil:

Early morning picture of him with grammie and the girls birthday morning for my youngest.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v318/trainspotr/2012-02-12112555.jpg)

He's 200 lbs now (down 17 from the start of his freshman year), and he's a 17 neck, (really trying to keep it that size, since sleep apnea is on his dad's side) 38-39 sleeve, but definitely needs an "athletic" or "slim" dress shirt and in casual dress shirts most certainly needs a 2X Tall to fit his shoulders. 16 shoe.


His "pediatrician" said to expect him to keep growing till he's 21.  :misspeak: He's asked once or twice about a weight set, but not quite wanting to be party to him tearing up his back and joints or taunting the propensity for triple AAA on my father's side of the family. His choice, though. Cardiovascular seems the way to go.

Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: rebekahc on February 24, 2012, 08:55:06 AM
well, we had an issue with the BMI index when ds went for his 10 or 11 year checkup.  He was considered obese on the chart for his age, weight and height.  Meantime, he is very lean and muscular (has always been naturally muscular) and muscle weighs a whole lot more than fat which is apparently what skewed the chart numbers.

It was a horrible thing.  It didn't help that the dr didn't look at him before declaring him obsese.  He was already a lot bigger than his peers (height wise) and he was really self conscious about it for some time  asking me if he is really fat. 

He was the furtherst thing from obese!  Very much in shape, low pulse because he's active. 

right now, he is struggling with everyone asking him how much h bench presses, but he's never lifted weights.  little comments about 'roids etc but he seems to take it in stride.


The exact same thing happened to us at DD's last check-up.  :rant:  The doctor never once took into account her muscle mass!

Does she look obese to you?

(http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc23/rebekahmom/chicago2.jpg)

She does like being strong and has no problem arm wrestling (and beating) all the boys in her grade!  Here's what one of them posted to her on FB - too funny!

Quote
Tbh.... You're really freaking strong! I don't know what you cheerleaders eat but it works....
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: Mfamom on February 24, 2012, 03:39:13 PM
No!  but she's very pretty!!!  How is she feeling?
Title: Re: Schools need bigger furnitire--so that they can accommodate obese students
Post by: rebekahc on February 24, 2012, 08:55:22 PM
Aww, thanks! :)

She's feeling ok. Her foot is starting to heal. Back still hurts, but neurosurgeon said not to worry about the dx'es for now. If its still hurting in a few months he will do an MRI. He doesn't think there's any reason to limit her activity for now, though.  :thumbsup: