Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Three blonde, blue-eyed siblings are named Suzy, Jack and Bill.  What color hair does the sister have?:
Please spell spammer backwards:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by spacecanada
 - May 22, 2015, 08:25:22 PM
I am not surprised.

Why haven't cautionary labels become mandatory yet?
Posted by Macabre
 - May 22, 2015, 07:32:29 AM
Wow.
Posted by LinksEtc
 - May 21, 2015, 06:00:16 PM
"FDA Study Finds Milk in Most Dark Chocolate, No Matter What Label Says"
http://community.kidswithfoodallergies.org/blog/fda-study-finds-milk-in-most-dark-chocolate-no-matter-what-label-says

QuoteYou shouldn't assume that dark chocolate contains no milk if the label does not mention it at all. "Milk-allergic consumers should be aware that 33% of the dark chocolates with no mention of milk anywhere on the label were, in fact, found to contain milk," says Luccioli.