Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Please spell spammer backwards:
Three blonde, blue-eyed siblings are named Suzy, Jack and Bill.  What color hair does the sister have?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by SweetandSour
 - November 06, 2011, 09:25:41 AM
I thought it was funny, and well written. I don't understand though why she is in denial about the allergy? I don't know that if our kids have an allergy that I would push a nut ban, and I have nut allergies to base my choice off of.  :dunno:
Posted by Mezzo
 - November 04, 2011, 09:10:48 PM
I actually think it's really a good article.
Posted by CMdeux
 - November 04, 2011, 06:10:05 PM
Eh.

I think they're still learning.  They're only about a year or so into things, after all.  I daresay that we probably weren't much better at that point in time.

Sure, they still come across as being a little.. er...

"WE are never going to be reactionary and awful over this... not like SOME people..."

But honestly, they are learning that it doesn't even MATTER how 'reasonable' you think you are being-- because people like Broccoli dad are always going to be out there.

Unless you're willing to be so reasonable, of course, that you simply take your inconveniently afflicted child away and shove him or her into a cupboard under a stairwell and make sure that the rest of humanity never has to see or hear about the problem...

well.  Y'all know what I'm getting at.

I'm guessing that in another four or five years, they may well be singing a different tune.  Because she seems to be seething about the same things that we do-- that how no matter HOW much we try to take on for ourselves in the way of responsibility, it's never enough for some people, and the only explanations are that those people really ARE that malevolently ignorant, or that they are irretrievably devoid of any and all compassion for anyone.  I find the fact that she's noticing that and remarking on it so early is a good sign, mostly. 
Posted by maeve
 - November 04, 2011, 05:15:16 PM
YKW, it was more in her comments to other posters in the comments section.

CM, it could be that the child has a high threshold but I was basing my comment more on this:

Quote
"Okay... No peanut butter." I said, "No! No nut butter! All nuts!". My husband, whose fear of being socially ostracized might override his fatherly protective instincts, said, "Um, other kids can have nuts. Our son can be around them.... He just can't eat them." Joel defended the class rights to nuts because he doesn't want to be a party pooper.


This is in a preschool.  While it might be fine for older kids to have nuts around a child with a nut allergy, it's not a good thing among young kiddos and I don't see a parent willing to undermine protections for their child because of social discomfort as being an effective advocate for them.

I also kind of see this as in denial to the risk (at least with younger children) that having nuts in the classroom poses.

Quote
We're sorry if you think your nut butters are so important during that half hour of the day. And personally, we'd actually be cool with you bringing your nut butters to school. Laszlo won't have a reaction to it from it's mere presence in the room.

I'm sorry but to me she came across as one of those parents who thinks their child's allergy isn't that bad.  It might not be but you never know what that next reaction is going to be like and it's best to prepare for the worst.
Posted by catelyn
 - November 04, 2011, 04:42:10 PM
Yeah I am peach mom. 
Posted by YouKnowWho
 - November 04, 2011, 01:24:38 PM
Shrug, I thought she was doing her best.  I loved the humorous take on it.  Did I miss something where she didn't say she was advocating for her child?  I enjoyed the humor.

I don't think I ever wished an allergen on his family.  The road sucks.  I think I did wish his fingers would shrivel off so he couldn't write anymore drivel.  Or maybe it was his manhood. 
Posted by CMdeux
 - November 04, 2011, 11:29:54 AM
Maybe.

And maybe they're just fortunate that their son has a pretty high threshold.  <shrug>  The vast majority of people with a PA do, fwiw.

I'd like to offer my personal assistance with Broccoli Dad.   :paddle:

Other than that-- a recommendation--

the comments following the blog post are rather typically awful.  Darwin, homeschooling, and GMO foods make an all-too-predictable appearance early on...   :disappointed:  Can't say you weren't warned.
Posted by maeve
 - November 04, 2011, 11:15:54 AM
I thought the same thing AllergyMom.  I feel bad for their son because I don't get the sense that he has the two stongest advocates for him because his parents still seem somewhat in denial.
Posted by AllergyMum
 - November 04, 2011, 09:17:37 AM
After reading Joel Stein's wife's blog, I can see why they are married.  Two peas in a pod
Posted by momma2boys
 - November 04, 2011, 08:52:31 AM
 :thumbsup:
Posted by ajasfolks2
 - November 04, 2011, 08:45:06 AM
Posted by SilverLining
 - September 15, 2011, 07:43:16 AM