login
FAS has upgraded our forum security. Some members may need to log in again. If you are unable to remember your login information, please email food.allergy.supt@flash.net and we will help you get back in. Thanks for your patience!


Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Three blonde, blue-eyed siblings are named Suzy, Jack and Bill.  What color hair does the sister have?:
Spell the answer to 6 + 7 =:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

By posting you acknowledge you are subject to our TOS, rules, and guidelines .


Topic Summary

Posted by: ajasfolks2
« on: October 30, 2015, 07:57:43 AM »

Federal oversight should mean there are STANDARDS that every OCR regional office adheres to.

Posted by: Macabre
« on: October 24, 2015, 11:04:31 AM »

It is wrong that so much hangs on the particular OCR.  So wrong.
Posted by: daisy madness
« on: October 23, 2015, 10:49:42 PM »

http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/08141282-a.pdf

Out of the Colorado Office.  School made accommodations via modifications to the IEP (child has autism as well) without evaluating first.  Very different LOF.  My school never evaluated either, but OCR didn't care.  Sigh.