login
FAS has upgraded our forum security. Some members may need to log in again. If you are unable to remember your login information, please email food.allergy.supt@flash.net and we will help you get back in. Thanks for your patience!


Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture Type the letters shown in the picture Type the letters shown in the picture Type the letters shown in the picture Type the letters shown in the picture Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Please spell spammer backwards:
Three blonde, blue-eyed siblings are named Suzy, Jack and Bill.  What color hair does the sister have?:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

By posting you acknowledge you are subject to our TOS, rules, and guidelines .


Topic Summary

Posted by: spacecanada
« on: May 22, 2015, 08:25:22 PM »

I am not surprised.

Why haven't cautionary labels become mandatory yet?
Posted by: Macabre
« on: May 22, 2015, 07:32:29 AM »

Wow.
Posted by: LinksEtc
« on: May 21, 2015, 06:00:16 PM »

"FDA Study Finds Milk in Most Dark Chocolate, No Matter What Label Says"
http://community.kidswithfoodallergies.org/blog/fda-study-finds-milk-in-most-dark-chocolate-no-matter-what-label-says

Quote
You shouldn’t assume that dark chocolate contains no milk if the label does not mention it at all. “Milk-allergic consumers should be aware that 33% of the dark chocolates with no mention of milk anywhere on the label were, in fact, found to contain milk,” says Luccioli.