Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Spell the answer to 6 + 7 =:
Please spell spammer backwards:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by guess
 - January 28, 2015, 12:58:31 PM
That depends on the nature of the suit.  Breach of contract, fraud, etc., is different and separate from disability law, or constitutional claims (in my non-lawyer perspective).  The recognition of the life threatening nature and duty towards child, it met a standard, rose to the level of sort of thing, even if it's not ADA related because they won. That's what I understand to be the stand out from this opinion. 

We also don't know what, if any, state specific laws or standards you may have been able to call upon for that contract.

Posted by ajasfolks2
 - January 28, 2015, 12:45:31 PM
Double WOW!

(Had we had such deep pockets, we would have sued private school in deep South.  However, I don't think it would have gone so well in 2007.)

Posted by CMdeux
 - January 27, 2015, 11:14:53 AM
Wow.


LYING about the willingness to deliberately withhold epinephrine treatment.  Holy moley.  :dalek:



Posted by guess
 - January 26, 2015, 07:47:57 PM
I could be completely wrong here but the case sounded like deep, complex contract law.
Posted by LinksEtc
 - January 26, 2015, 07:34:01 PM
"What a Civilized Society Will Tolerate": Van Halen Wins Appeal in Fight Over Safety at School for Allergic Daughter

http://allergylawproject.com/2015/01/22/what-a-civilized-society-will-tolerate-van-halen-wins-appeal-in-fight-over-safety-at-school-for-allergic-daughter/