Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Three blonde, blue-eyed siblings are named Suzy, Jack and Bill.  What color hair does the sister have?:
Spell the answer to 6 + 7 =:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by CMdeux
 - August 14, 2014, 03:33:01 PM
... and this is why I think that north American carriers are insane to have made it the industry standard to NEVER make cabin announcements.

Honestly, I'm not sure that I'd do another transAtlantic flight without one.  (Our flights did do announcements)-- because there was not a corporate prohibition on them at the time.

   :-[  I'd hate to think that my DD can't go back to the UK, which she loved.  She would like to study overseas, but man, that nut allergy is a WICKED barrier to the required travel.   :'(
Posted by TabiCat
 - August 14, 2014, 03:26:25 PM
After reading the artical I was sort of wondering if his bag of nut were indeed to catylist (not to say it was ok for him to be so cavilier as to risk opening them after being warned of the risk).

I was just wondering if it sounded more like residue from previous passenger AND fingers in mouth to anyone?
Posted by Jessica
 - August 14, 2014, 02:29:13 PM
I'm curious to know what the experts that claim anaphylaxis from airborne particles are extremely rare/impossible have to say about this. I'm sure it's rare but some of them are saying it simply doesn't happen. In the webinar about air travel they said something similar.