Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Three blonde, blue-eyed siblings are named Suzy, Jack and Bill.  What color hair does the sister have?:
Spell the answer to 6 + 7 =:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by ajasfolks2
 - July 21, 2015, 09:28:46 PM
Important details further down in that article (my bold/ital. added for emphasis):

Quote

Most anaphylactic attacks in children and teenagers are triggered by nuts. After a child died after eating a nut product made in a school food technology class in 2011, the NSW Department of Education has banned all nuts in any school activities, including camps, class projects and food technology classes. It does not require schools to impose blanket nut bans on students, but says individual schools many decide to implement them.

Posted by LinksEtc
 - July 21, 2015, 03:56:29 PM
Tweeted by @IgECPD


"School nut bans don't protect kids with food allergies from anaphylaxis"
http://www.theage.com.au/national/school-nut-bans-dont-protect-kids-with-food-allergies-from-anaphylaxis-20150718-giexvh.html?utm_campaign=echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#link_time=1437268043

QuoteOfficial anaphylaxis prevention guidelines have been updated by the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy to explicitly state that food bans in upper primary and high schools do not work, and can actually cause problems.
QuoteDespite the official advice, many schools are heeding parental anxiety and banning nuts