Food Allergy Support

Discussion Boards => Main Discussion Board => Topic started by: hk on July 29, 2013, 04:06:52 PM

FAS has upgraded our forum security. Some members may need to log in again. If you are unable to remember your login information, please email food.allergy.supt@flash.net and we will help you get back in. Thanks for your patience!

Title: Fatal Reaction
Post by: hk on July 29, 2013, 04:06:52 PM
This girl was with her (doctor) father and given 3 EpiPens, but still died.  It sounds like treatment was delayed because she initially exhibited no symptoms. 

http://www.news10.net/news/local/article/252201/2/Allergy-attack-claims-Carmichael-teen-at-summer-camp
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: rebekahc on July 29, 2013, 04:23:13 PM
 :'(
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: yelloww on July 29, 2013, 04:29:43 PM
That's so awful!

And so many of us wouldn't Epi if there weren't any symptoms..... I know I wouldn't.

 :-[
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: candyguru on July 29, 2013, 05:30:01 PM
That's so awful!

And so many of us wouldn't Epi if there weren't any symptoms..... I know I wouldn't.

 :-[

even if they did epi immediately, it may not have made any difference.. sad to say, it seems the epi pen is no guarantee of recovery... it helps but not 100% successful :(   

such a sad tragic event :(
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: CMdeux on July 29, 2013, 05:43:45 PM
Exactly what I was thinking, CandyGuru.

This is the scenario that has left me horror-stricken for the notion that if one just "carried one of those injections" all will always be well. 

No, not always.  My heart breaks for her family.   :'(
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Jessica on July 29, 2013, 06:16:13 PM
:(

There is a LOT of misinformation about epi pens and allergies among the non-allergic. On a local news station's facebook they recently posted about keeping bees in the city and the concern with bee sting allergies. One person said that if someone's allergic, they have an epi pen anyway so if they got stung, they could just inject themselves and go on their merry way. Another person (who is allergic to bee stings) and I both told her that the epi is not a cure, you still have to go the ER, not a guarantee, etc and she thanked us for the education. It's rare anymore when someone is open to information like that. Other people on the thread were not quite as nice.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: GoingNuts on July 29, 2013, 06:38:48 PM
Absolutely awful story.  Something to discuss with my son.   :'(
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: yelloww on July 29, 2013, 08:04:24 PM
Exactly what I was thinking, CandyGuru.

This is the scenario that has left me horror-stricken for the notion that if one just "carried one of those injections" all will always be well. 

No, not always.  My heart breaks for her family.   :'(

And this is what infuriated me about that horrid ad that Epi put out with the kid in the car w/ the birthday cake.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: aggiedog on July 29, 2013, 08:24:35 PM
Horrible.  My heart goes out to the family.

This is exactly why we did OIT with dd.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Stinky10 on July 29, 2013, 09:42:10 PM
That's so awful!

And so many of us wouldn't Epi if there weren't any symptoms..... I know I wouldn't.

 :-[

Our allergist was very clear in his early action plans - she said immediate epi with known ingestion - with or without symptoms.  So this was when he was 3, 4, 5, and I think around 6 it stopped saying that.   I wonder if that was b/c he would be able to communicate symptoms better as he got older?   When comparing notes with others I only ran across a few people who were told that - but ours was clear.  I think I'm going to get it back in there. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: GingerPye on July 29, 2013, 10:53:13 PM
How Awful.   :'(
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: my3guys on July 30, 2013, 06:16:31 AM
 :( Sitting at my computer crying.  That poor family.  I applaud them for speaking out so soon after her death in hopes others will learn.

I wonder what kind of reaction history she had? Or if it even matters?  Our plan doesn't say epi with known ingestion.  I'm going to talk to my allergist about this.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: YouKnowWho on July 30, 2013, 07:28:21 AM
What bothered me on the facebook comments from the original news story was the amount of blame on the parents.  How it took so long to get to the hospital - why did they delay epi pens, how could the parent let the child eat food they didn't provide, etc. 

But moreso because I read a few comments about how epi won't help cardiac or digestive issues.  Or how only peanut allergies are that dangerous (but you all know the personal bias I have against that).

I will say this - many comments made about why peanuts need to be removed from these situations and many people liking and agreeing as opposed to the whole your precious snowflake needs to watch out. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: aggiedog on July 30, 2013, 07:42:39 AM
Quote
I will say this - many comments made about why peanuts need to be removed from these situations and many people liking and agreeing as opposed to the whole your precious snowflake needs to watch out.

Hmm, maybe the tide is slowly turning in the public's eye?  That would be something.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: SilverLining on July 30, 2013, 08:00:25 AM
YKW, I think a lot of parents seem to need to blame the parents.  It makes them feel safer to convince themselves it can never happen to them...because they don't allow <fill in the blank>.

It's the real "false sense of security" in my opinion.  Believing every fatal reaction you read about is outside the realm of possibility for your own family.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: CMdeux on July 30, 2013, 08:38:33 AM
I wish it were.

But if I had ever truly believed that, I wouldn't have invested the kind of time that I have here over the years. 

It's magical thinking that does that, I think.  Once you've seen a close shave or two, though, I think that a person would have to be delusional to think that it can't happen to themselves.


This is precisely why we are such FREAKS about avoidance, about her wearing her epinephrine, and about never-ever-ever-ever compromising DD's beta-receptors.  People may understand the second, but only very very rarely the first.




Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Macabre on July 30, 2013, 08:38:52 AM
I think Epi upon known ingestion is going back into our rule book. Our allergist never told us this--or may have. I don't remember. But it will be the plan going forward. 

I would think that it's possible there were symptoms, perhaps slight, that weren't recognizable as symptoms.  Several if us have known some of those uncommon symptoms.

Or not--I could see how once it hit the gut how things could have cascaded from there and the first symptoms showed.


This poor family. I am heartbroken for them.

I've told DH. Haven't told DS yet. Not quite sure how.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: rebekahc on July 30, 2013, 10:02:14 AM
That's so awful!

And so many of us wouldn't Epi if there weren't any symptoms..... I know I wouldn't.

 :-[

Our allergist was very clear in his early action plans - she said immediate epi with known ingestion - with or without symptoms.  So this was when he was 3, 4, 5, and I think around 6 it stopped saying that.   I wonder if that was b/c he would be able to communicate symptoms better as he got older?   When comparing notes with others I only ran across a few people who were told that - but ours was clear.  I think I'm going to get it back in there.

Our plan was that way, too, when DS was younger - peanut/tree nut specific (not for other allergens).  Known ingestion = epi even in the absence of symptoms.  Possible ingestion = epi with any symptom.  No suspected ingestion = epi if two body systems were involved (or for one "red" symptom).
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: becca on July 30, 2013, 10:20:12 AM
So sad.  I am so sorry for her parents loss.  :(
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: hopechap on July 30, 2013, 10:44:51 AM
I am so sad for them. It breaks my heart that a child died. A child -- one moment celebrating and having fun and doing normal things -- like camp. 

Epi-Pen failed. I would feel betrayed. 

Rice Krispy treats are usually safe.  Girl selected what is usually an ok choice.  That failed.

No, she did not stick to what she herself brought from home. But -- over the years, it gets easy to lapse -- you get away with it many times. Society rewards you -- While many here would be horrified -- my late friend kept sarcastically said to me when I let my kid eat a brownie at a church bake sale affair:  "at least you have relaxed some".  I ignored her. Because I am too tired.  But this is not about me and my choices - even if it does make us reflect.  I too wish people would get over the peanut butter thing for pot lucks -- it just seems antiquated and oblivious to keep bringing it in as a party item. 

I am so sorry. This is a crappy medical condition -- something so innocent as a bite of a sweet should not be able to kill you,
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: CMdeux on July 30, 2013, 02:15:38 PM
http://www.sacbee.com/2013/07/30/5607195/years-of-caution-about-peanut.html


Some additional info here.  She evidently did not have a clear Hx which indicated anaphylaxis potential.  Her family was simply incredibly cautious.  They sound exceptionally well-educated to me. 

Honestly, I have to agree-- it really does sound to me like the family did everything right.  The problem is that when you get over into the cardiovascular effects, everything is "is this just becuase I'm LOOKING for this symptom" until you're in critical condition.  Without any Hx of possible anaphylaxis, most allergists wouldn't be recommending Epi without symptoms.

This child made a simple, single mistake in a lifetime of being careful-- and she paid for it with her life.   :'(

Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Scout on July 30, 2013, 02:29:52 PM
 :'( DH just texted me this story and I immediately came here........OMG

we have traveled to Hawaii and Vegas this month, lots of eating out.....we did get a Suite in Vegas with a full kitchen (that was so clean I didn't want to use it, lol)  at the Signature/MGM Grand.....and ate Breakfast and lunch there....but wow

Taking stock and wow.....this hit me hard...so sad.

MY DH said he was nervous this weekend with all the escalator handles she touched, funny the things you notice.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: from_tahoe on July 30, 2013, 03:36:24 PM
While this is truly heart breaking, I do have to wonder if the distance from medical care (and unfortunately, the quality) have something to do with it. My local online news source had an article on this even before it was known to be an allergy death. While it doesn't say the name, the location and date are correct, and this is a very small town news source.

Where she was would have been about 20 minutes to the nearest hospital, even by ambulance.  Add to that EMS response time....  Also this hospital by no means is a trauma center.  ANYONE with even a minor heart attack earns an automatic helicopter ride out of the area.  I've been there in three anaphylatic reactions.  Two were treated correctly.  The other time (first anaphylatic reaction ever) I was not given epi, despite breathing issues and a very clear reaction going on.  This hospital is avoided by most locals at all costs.  Hearing about this really scares me.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: maeve on July 30, 2013, 03:51:25 PM
I just read the article you linked to CM and I'm really upset with the statements of their allergist.  It really seems that they may have been given some poor guidance. 

I cannot tell you how often I am reminded not just by Dr. Wood but also his truly wonderful nurse practioner not to use past reactions as a guideline.  I remember being on the phone with the nurse practioner about something else when I got a call from DD's day care about her last reaction.  I said something to the nurse along the lines that DD's reaction was progressing along the lines of previous reactions and there was a very pointed pause followed by a very clear but gentle admonishment that DD will not always react the way she had in the past.  The nurse practioner was right, that reaction was different, slightly but still different than DD's previous reaction.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Macabre on July 30, 2013, 04:11:54 PM
I found this statement by the allergist irresponsible. I would think if a parent of a child with LTFAs is concerned about a symptom, she shouldn't have to be worried that the doctor thinks it is trivial:


"I deal with families who don't even have epinephrine pens and teens who don't have the pens on them. They'll come rushing in to me because they have hives."

Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: my3guys on July 30, 2013, 04:36:05 PM
I just left a message with our allergist to change both their plans.

As for the allergist's comment McC, I took it differently.  I took it to mean that some clients don't carry epipens, so they go racing into the office with symptoms (giving hives as an example) instead of carrying their epipens.  I didn't read that as him trivializing hives. <shrug>
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: hopechap on July 30, 2013, 04:41:41 PM
This may be inappropriate raking over details, but I wonder if --- did the Benadryl mask the symptoms? I remember learning this HERE. That Benadryl could do that.

And would like to complain-- if the camp was providing the food why couldn't they have eliminated PB ?? Problematic when asking random individuals to bring in party food -- but not so darn hard when one institution is doing the food -- for a group with an allergic child. I mean would the night have been any less if they had left the damn stuff out ? Would less people have come to camp the following year?  Such a senseless, sad loss of life.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: lakeswimr on July 30, 2013, 05:48:25 PM
They could eliminate peanuts but thy cant take cross contamination out if everyone's kitchens.  It is a big risk to eat things with no label.   I feel so as for this family.  The answer isn't to make wverone stop using peanut products, though.  You would see more fatalities from Xcode that way. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: CMdeux on July 30, 2013, 05:54:27 PM
Honestly, I can't assume that benadryl WILL mask anaphylaxis.  It certainly never has with DD.

If that argument held any water at all, it would be a problem for the thousands of allergic people who are on maintenance antihistamines.  It's not.

It's like a seawall-- it'll hold out a high tide, but not a hurricane surge.  It's not like not having it there makes things "better" or more noticeable, actually.

One problem that I saw as potentially problematic here is that this was a classic fatal reaction; no cutaneous symptoms, and only VERY vague, really subjective symptoms until she was just a few minutes from death when the really overt (and all grade IV+) stuff started and snowballed.  That is what kills teens and young adults, actually.  They lose some of the "classic" allergy symptoms that are grade II and III-- and if those are things that they and their families have come to regard as litmus tests for "is this a reaction?" then they have to be in VERY serious trouble before they realize that they are dealing with in-progress anaphylaxis.  Another thing that surprises people is just how FAST it can happen.  I can't emphasize that enough.  Fatal reactions can be fast.  Breathtakingly fast.   It's surreal. 

No hives doesn't mean no reaction.

Benadryl is irrelevent to that, actually.  DD hasn't reliably manifested hives with anything but minor (contact) reactions since she was about 7yo.    She also doesn't always have audible wheezing.  But she's had blood pressure crashes, which are just as capable of killing.

I've known at least 30 different people to do exactly what this family did-- that is, wait-and-see after a possible small ingestion (remember, the report is that she spit it out and rinsed her mouth).  Only about five of them even paid for it with a trip to the emergency room, and only one of those children required more than ER care for a few hours.  None of them died.  I literally have only known ONE person in all my years with FAS to have administered epi after a probable ingestion-- but with NO symptoms.

As for remote and non-ideal hospital conditions, well... welcome to the West.  I can name on my two hands the number of places it'd be "okay" to anaphylax out here west of the Mississippi.  If you're away from a population center (and geographically, that's a lot of us), then you're going to have a non-ideal hospital experience.  On the other hand, there are less-than-stellar emergency rooms in cities, too. 

I know exactly how this happened.  I just know it.  This girl asked someone in a dimly lit room "what are those?" and someone answered her-- "Oh, they're just rice krispie treats."  So she took one.  Simple misunderstanding-- maybe not something that an adult would have misjudged-- but at 13, I could very easily see my DD doing it with the prepackaged ones, at least.  I'm pretty sure that there is no way that she'd have eaten something that was home-made.  But other people do it all the time.







Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: SilverLining on July 30, 2013, 07:17:56 PM
Quote
If that argument held any water at all, it would be a problem for the thousands of allergic people who are on maintenance antihistamines.  It's not.

Like me.  (not currently, but previously)
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: SilverLining on July 30, 2013, 07:21:53 PM
I just left a message with our allergist to change both their plans.

I think I've read a few different people make similar comments.

Anyone willing to share, I would be interested to know how the allergists react.  Do they immediately agree, get talked into it, or feel you are over-reacting from a news article.  (To be clear, I do NOT feel this is over-reacting...just curious if doctors feel that way.

Quote
As for the allergist's comment McC, I took it differently.  I took it to mean that some clients don't carry epipens, so they go racing into the office with symptoms (giving hives as an example) instead of carrying their epipens.  I didn't read that as him trivializing hives. <shrug>

I read it the same as you did my3guys.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: my3guys on July 30, 2013, 07:52:32 PM
I'll be curious what his response is too SL, and I'll share once we connect.  I remember talking about it with him years ago, and given ds' reaction history, we agreed that we didn't think it was warranted.  Now that he's been in school system for a while, I'm more comfortable with a more aggressive call for epi, because we don't have any frequently questionable events.  He's never reacted in school.

I realize, however, this thinking is kind of backwards.  Young kids have a high danger of ingesting something by accident.  Then again, he's almost a teenager -- and I feel like the danger is almost back to the toddler years, meaning he could do something foolish to try to fit in.

I talked with both FA boys tonight, different conversations due to their ages, but reminded them the importance of only eating food they're 1000% sure of.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: twinturbo on July 30, 2013, 08:17:50 PM
DS1 has his first post-Sinai appointment tomorrow. We have a lot to cover--including a nut panel SPT so I don't know how much time I'll devote to it but I'd like DH to go over the Sinai EAP that calls for Benadryl + wait for known ingestion of peanut with history of clear multisystem anaphylaxis including respiratory distress. I was never comfortable with that especially given some shift in best practices over the last 1-2 years.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: shoshana on July 30, 2013, 08:20:54 PM
this is so very sad and disturbing.  i know i am in the minority, but i sometimes wonder why people think it is being careful allowing your food allergic child to eat things made by other people, where the other people were obviously cooking things that had nuts.  we are all so careful calling companies and worrying about cross-contamination (and rightfully so).  i just don't feel that eating out is so special that i need to risk my kids life.  it's a pain, but we schlep safe food for her everywhere.

my heart does go out to the family.

Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: CMdeux on July 30, 2013, 10:46:39 PM
We do, too, Shosh.

We also alienate pretty much everyone who knows us by doing so... which is keying me up to a pretty high pitch already this week given that during the next ten days, we'll be subjected to no less than five potlucks that we can't get out of.  So we'll go, bring food that is immediately contaminated (and therefore unsafe for anyone in our household), smile, and patiently explain why we aren't eating food others have prepared... and try to avoid the entire conversation about why we're also not eating what WE brought...

God, I hate potlucks.  I hate them.  They ruin social activities for us. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: lakeswimr on July 30, 2013, 10:54:02 PM
CM,

I am only repeating what my son's allergist and other allergists have said.  Some allergist agree with my son's allergist.  FAAN's official position was what you are saying.  If you read what I wrote, I said that I think my allergist would agree that it would be quite rare but in some cases benadryl could mask early symptoms that would indicate that a reaction is continuing.  He told me that sometimes the reaction starts with mild symptoms, benadryl is given so we don't see things such as perhaps the spread of hives (and Beandryl is good with stomach aches in many so you might not see that as soon), meanwhile the reaction can be building inside and then it seems that it comes on suddenly when in reality it was there all along.  I wasn't "assuming" anything.  I have to go by what my son's allergist recommends which is NO benadryl unless epi is given in case of known or suspected ingestion of a food allergen.  Benadryl is for being around cats or something like that or else only after the epi, never before.  From reading at another board it seems allergists are about 50/50 split on giving benadryl for minor symptoms and not.  Some are now taking benadryl entirely out of action plans. 

So, it isn't a matter that he claimed it happens all the time or would always happen but that he said it could mask ana sometimes so for him it isn't worth that risk and I'm going with his recommendations. 

This particular case is so tragic and so sad.  The girl looks like she was just lovely.  What a horrible thing to happen.  And you are right, it sounds like this happened so very quickly.  Our plan says to wait for symptoms even with known ingestion.  The school had it as epi for known ingestion and I didn't correct them, though.  I'm going to talk to DS's allergist about that. 

Sorry for the potlucks.  That stinks.  I always have to explain why we are leaving the food there and not taking it home.  I learned to keep a good chunk of it aside for DS.  He had ana at a potluck 1 1/2 years ago so I'm even less into them now.  He didn't eat anything.  It was contact ingestion.  I am very fine with leaving those things early or skipping.  Sorry you have so  many in a week! 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Macabre on July 31, 2013, 10:11:50 AM
About potlucks---

We have breakfast and a lite lunch at our church every Sunday. I don't know if I have been to a function at the church that hasn't involved food (not taking into account weekly communion).
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Momcat on July 31, 2013, 01:12:41 PM
It's very tragic, but the fact is that eating a random unlabeled dessert is not careful. It's as if she had darted out into the freeway. Being careful every other time you crossed the street will not help you in that case.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: maeve on July 31, 2013, 01:23:25 PM
No hives doesn't mean no reaction.

My very smart 12-year-old DD reminded me of this when I had my recent reaction to an antibiotic (one I had taken without problem in the past).  I had intense itching--though not all over--and no hives.  She reminded me that there didn't need to be hives for it to be a reaction.  I'd also had an itchy throat and when I took the second dose I had coughing as well as the itching and throat symptoms.  My reaction resolved on its own.  Folks from here that are also on Facebook chided me to call the doctor. 

I was so pleased with DD, though with reminding me that sometimes a reaction doesn't present classically.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: CMdeux on July 31, 2013, 02:19:56 PM
It's very tragic, but the fact is that eating a random unlabeled dessert is not careful. It's as if she had darted out into the freeway. Being careful every other time you crossed the street will not help you in that case.

That does assume that:

a) she didn't discuss ingredients with anyone, and
b) that if she had, that she'd have received accurate information in return.

Both are huge pitfalls.  But the alternative is "trust no one."

I'm often viewed as pretty extreme for taking that stance-- even here, and even among people who know that we do it because of my DD's ample reaction history and sensitivity.

Many of our members (and their kids) do trust others to prepare food for them.  In light of the reports about this family's level of vigilance/care prior to this, I have to think that one of several things happened here:

a) Mom and Dad were told one thing and something else occurred (oh, just Rice Krispie Treats-- maybe S'mores.  You know, that kind of thing)

b) 13yo DD is getting a LITTLE bit more leash at this age... but please note, both parents were present-- which is entirely consistent with a pretty rigorous standard of management

c) 13yo, feeling very virtuous and responsible, asks about the treats and is reassured (probably by another adolescent-- or maybe a clueless adult) that they are "just RKT's"  so she bites into one.  Why?  Well, in part because she was 13.  She didn't WANT to make a big deal about it and ruin what had been a perfect day.  We've been through this ourselves-- DD will make a decision (or one of us will, frankly) which is about just being TIRED. OF. LIVING. LIKE. THIS.  It's why I hate potlucks-- please see above.  Everyone URGES you to trust them-- they go out of their way and are then OFFENDED when you still refuse to take your life and put it into their hands.  I completely get why a lapse like this could happen in an instant.  I really do.


Honestly, I can see this happening to about 60-70% of the kids who are part of even THIS community under the right set of circumstances.   Even my daughter.

 :'(

Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: twinturbo on July 31, 2013, 02:31:53 PM
I found out just yesterday FOUR months after the fact that the school left it up to DS1 whether to drink lemonade made for their class by upper classmen. No call to me despite how much I rode them daily about food. No matter how often I have him repeat daily before going to school to only eat out of his lunchbox. The attrition of being left out got to him. In his 6/7 year old mind it made sense that he's not allergic to lemons. He was burnt out and wanted the lemonade everyone else was drinking. :-/
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: lakeswimr on July 31, 2013, 04:00:35 PM
To me it isn't about trust.  It is about a level of understanding about xcont that I find difficult to impossible to convey.   I didn't even gent until I messed up and fed my friends son something I made that I forgot had one of his allergens.  He had similar allergies and I forgot about one.    So careful with my child hat I was over confident.   I used to make 'gluten free' things for another friend, too until I realized pretty near everything in my kitchen for sugar to salt and more is xcontam wheat from when I bake and cool.  Probably even
My oil!  So to expect others to get it t hat level seems unrealistic to me.  Dr woods story of his colleague messing up is a good example.  Unless I felt a person truly understood xont and was willing to use new flour, new sugar, probably a new pan as many have had crust food residue in corners I don't think I would feel comfortable.  When we eat out we hose things that are lowest risk and don't have the risks of baked goods from other people's homes. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: ajasfolks2 on July 31, 2013, 04:03:46 PM
Crossposting.

Putting this link here.

Tragic Loss of Sacramento Teen Reveals Flaws in Anaphylaxis Guidelines

by Dr. Mark Greenwald

[url]http://epicentermedical.com/tragic-loss-of-sacramento-teen-reveals-flaws-in-anaphylaxis-guidelines/[/url]
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: GoingNuts on July 31, 2013, 04:33:48 PM
Thank you for posting ajas.  Really sensible, IMHO.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: SilverLining on July 31, 2013, 05:42:55 PM
am I the only one who thinks someone (even a doctor) who was NOT there and has not met the patient before or after her death should NOT be giving advice to everyone, that they also have never met?
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Macabre on July 31, 2013, 07:05:35 PM
Well SL, do you have a problem with our promoting the anaphylaxis grading chart as much as we do here? Same thing, different set of criteria for administering Epi.

Many doctors do prescribe Epi upon known ingestion. Every bit of research says sooner rather than later (scroll down to see a recent tweet underscoring this). 

Honestly, many US allergists (and I would say Brit ones) do not give clear direction on when to give it--or say to give it later than others do. Now, we (my fam) have tended to go see gurus, but how are even they to say when exactly I should give myself an Epi outside of a crisis moment?  When I am in the office, is their standard spiel going to be what works for me in the midst of a reaction?  Possibly. Possibly not.

I frankly don't see the point of only listening to my doctor about this.  I do see the point of reading and taking in current thought on beat practices--which changes over time.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: LinksEtc on July 31, 2013, 07:18:17 PM
SL, the article made me a little uncomfortable ... I think it's ok to discuss whether maybe the guidelines need adjusting, but it's another to advise patients to do something other than what the patient's personal allergist wrote on their FA action plan.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: YouKnowWho on July 31, 2013, 07:29:54 PM
We went to the remote location of our allergist's office today.  I had no idea it would be so busy (many of his patients are OTP and his main office is ITP but it is also the start of school here in a few days).  Do you know how many times I heard him answer "Yes to Epi if known ingestion?"  Every single time - even took phone calls, as well as the office staff.  Many of his patients want that information changed on their action plan.

I might hesitate at home, and that is a horrible thought.  I know not every reaction will be the same but I also know key words and when to worry vs when to watch.  However school does not know my kids the way I do.  I need them to be on the ball.

This death hit home for many of us. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: SilverLining on July 31, 2013, 08:34:21 PM
Well SL, do you have a problem with our promoting the anaphylaxis grading chart as much as we do here? Same thing, different set of criteria for administering Epi.

I haven't seen that the grading chart is based on ONE instance.  (Or is this doctor using one instance to get traffic?  I'm not sure.)

Either way, he is a doctor, who was not there, never saw the patient, and as LinksEtc said, he's possibly advising against a person's own physician. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: YouKnowWho on July 31, 2013, 08:45:16 PM
Well SL, do you have a problem with our promoting the anaphylaxis grading chart as much as we do here? Same thing, different set of criteria for administering Epi.

I haven't seen that the grading chart is based on ONE instance.  (Or is this doctor using one instance to get traffic?  I'm not sure.)

Either way, he is a doctor, who was not there, never saw the patient, and as LinksEtc said, he's possibly advising against a person's own physician.

True - but it was definitely the topic of conversation at the allergist's office today for us and many others.  School is getting ready to start and the forms need to be filled out.  I would rather the nurse erred on the side of caution given that while she is friendly with my kids (and I am blessed to be in a small school where that can happen, I am also at the mercy of the school district if they move her or cut her funding), would she know the words that my kids use when a reaction is happening.  I have been working with both kids on being clearer - what does icky mean, does it mean you cannot control your bowels or you are going to throw up or you feel like you are having an out of body experience.  That might be a hard statement for an adult to justify in the midst of a reaction, let alone a child, kwim?

We did change to epi on ingestion.  Sadly, I may need to change that mindset for myself and not just for the school.  I know it doesn't take much for DS1 to react.  And there have been times when it meant flour in the air causing coughing/asthmatic issues that could be much more serious but I give Bendaryl and pray.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Ree on July 31, 2013, 09:20:45 PM
I'm so saddened, distraught, angry, confused...I could go on and on.  Every time I hear about a food allergy loss, I can't seem to wrap my brain around the fact that our bodies can self-destruct from a food that nourishes the bodies of others. 

I may have missed this info somewhere but wondering..

1)  Did she have asthma?
2)  Could the Epi-pens have been expired?

Continued prayers for Natalie and her family... :heart:
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: hopechap on July 31, 2013, 09:39:48 PM
Many PA people DO take that risk. I am not the only one. And several of the adults I know with PA do -- they don't live out of a lunchbox.  But whenever this happens -- I do tighten control again.

Careful family? Yes.  How many of you carry three Epi? I always carry two. 
My rule for risk -taking is always -- only when your parents are with you -- not fair to give a known risk to teachers and others.  But then my child began breaking the rule -- buying cinnamon rolls from the cafeteria for breakfast. part of fourth grade cool in private school is sauntering into cafeteria for breakfast and tea. Caught him when I looked at online account details.  Not about me and I could be very very wrong in allowing this. But with this said -- yes, most PA people I know eat pretty normally. And they sometimes have trouble with it. Three adult friends have had trouble with bakeries. So - what happened to FAHF-2 darn it? That was supposed to tame reactions from severe to mild.

No, I do not blame the family at all.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Macabre on July 31, 2013, 11:49:28 PM
Not to totally derail the thread, but SL I didn't take that doc's blog post rec was based on a single instance.  That just proved a good example for him.

The difference between him and the grading chart is that the chart was approved by an organization.

What he is saying isn't out there, though. Other allergists do say it. And it's interesting. Someone (TT?) posted something very similar before Natalie's death about recommendations for administering Epi in a medical setting are not necessarily what's most appropriate for the field.

I'm not convinced that what my own doctor tells me is sacred. Or even special. DS' first allergist said we didn't need an Epi. Burks said you don't have anaphylaxis without ingestion.  My Duke allergist initially told me I couldn't have anaphylaxis from shrimp (though I had a couple of years earlier) then my next visit said of course I could. Sooooo glad I didn't listen to him the first time. Well, I did eat grilled chicken at a restaurant. The second time I did that I had a reaction.

I do know other docs have tweeted about earlier Epi admin--citing this blog post.
I don't know whether he was right or wrong for him to post what he did as a general recommendation. I do know that it's not that far from what I see other allergists doing on twitter.

And I do know it's a good thing so many here didn't just follow their doctors' recs  for managing FAs. They learned more about managing FAs here than from their docs. As did I.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: hopechap on August 01, 2013, 05:23:00 AM
Which is kind of a huge problem. I cannot even enumerate the conflicting and bad advice doctors give on food allergy. As everyone here can too. Perhaps some of the reason is that reaction is mercurial -- always exceptions -- a mild reactor one day has a major. Heck. MT SINAI has said contradictory things to me about what kind of reaction son could have and how to address it.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: SilverLining on August 01, 2013, 06:11:20 AM

The difference between him and the grading chart is that the chart was approved by an organization.

EXACTLY!

That's half the problem.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: SilverLining on August 01, 2013, 06:19:56 AM
Not to totally derail the thread, but SL I didn't take that doc's blog post rec was based on a single instance.  That just proved a good example for him.

Previous posts had slightly different advice.  This blog post appears to be based on ONE patient that he never met and an instance he did not witness.  How many times does a news article get some facts incorrect or incomplete?
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: becca on August 01, 2013, 06:47:29 AM
The article makes a lot of sense to me.  I agree with McC, that he is using this case as an example, it illustrate a larger point.  and, fact is, we will never know if she would have survived even if she got her epi right away.  We all want to think so for obvious reasons.  But, we will never know. 

Our action plans have never included benadryl, ever.  Frankly, I only ever heard of administering benadryl early in a reaction on the forum, when it was another place.  On our school forms, our allergist was always about the epi if any known ingestion.  Period.  This was specifically to avoid wasting time on the benadryl if epi is needed. 

Of course, this is the same allergist that never allowed dd to eat the baked eggs she safely ate her entire life(until he told us to stop), and now eats again.  They are not perfect.  He errs on the side of caution because my child's life is in his hands based on his advice. 

Currently our ped follows out allergy and I fill out the plan, and just drop it to be signed.  I have a new ped for dd this year.  Will have to see if she changes anything I fill out.  My other guy would sigh whatever I specified, but it was what the allergist had recommended wrt epi administration.  I just needed a new signature each year. 

I think I have access to emailing dd's new ped.  I think I will send her a link to the article here and to the death of Natalie, on the chance she has not read about it or heard about it yet. 

And, I checked all our epis and they are *all* expiring this month or next.  Wish me luck with my new insurance.  I try to have 3 sets.  One at home at all times, with dd, and at school. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: my3guys on August 01, 2013, 06:48:12 AM
I'm sure most of us have seen this food allergy action plan.  I like the updates to it.

http://www.foodallergy.org/document.doc?id=125

We're off to the allergist today.  I spoke to our allergist yesterday, so I'm reporting back SL. :) He's happy to complete the forms however we request.  He reiterated there's no harm to giving epi early without symptoms.

He had read all the accounts he could find regarding this death.  He still has questions on timing of epi -- he said the vast majority of studies show that epi works when given promptly at first sign of symptoms.

He circled back to our old discussion that depending on reaction history, he doesn't automatically order epi without symptoms because some schools can over-react and child will possibly get some unnecessary epis, trips to the hospital.  And he reiterated again that there's no medical danger, there's an emotional toll on the child.

***** Now this is just his take, I'm not taking it as gospel, and don't want anyone else to either.  DH and I talked and I think we're going to go with the more aggressive action plan.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: SilverLining on August 01, 2013, 07:06:17 AM
I'm glad you and our doctor agree on course of action.  :)
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: my3guys on August 01, 2013, 07:19:06 AM
Ack -- Just looked at the official town forms.  Choices are:

1) administer epi immediately upon known/suspected exposure to allergen.

2) administer epi with symptoms of anaphylaxis

I don't like the word exposure. Too open and vague.  My kids have other allergens that they react mildly to with ingestion even.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: lakeswimr on August 01, 2013, 07:30:08 AM
Not to totally derail the thread, but SL I didn't take that doc's blog post rec was based on a single instance.  That just proved a good example for him.

Previous posts had slightly different advice.  This blog post appears to be based on ONE patient that he never met and an instance he did not witness.  How many times does a news article get some facts incorrect or incomplete?

Personally I don't have a problem with it.  I think that he is ringing a bell few would hear if he didn't ring it quite this way.  I am not reading that and thinking, "i'm going to do everything this doctor (who I haven't ever met) says."  I am going to *talk* to my son's doctor about this, though, and get his opinion.  I am going to push for DS to have a plan *at school* that calls for epi with known ingestion.  That's what he had last year even though his plan didn't call for it.  I want that to continue.  I would like it to come from the allergist, though. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: lakeswimr on August 01, 2013, 07:32:47 AM
I like the wording in FARE's plan - if FA was definitely eaten. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: CMdeux on August 01, 2013, 07:53:15 AM
I agree, Lakeswimr.

Quote
Someone (TT?) posted something very similar before Natalie's death about recommendations for administering Epi in a medical setting are not necessarily what's most appropriate for the field.

That may well have been me.  DD had anaphylaxis after SCIT several times-- mild, though, and while they had epi DRAWN for DD, they did 'wait-and-see' with her under observation.

Interestingly, the one time that we suspect that the exposure was peanut (and probably aerosol, not ingestion, certainly) the doc himself never took his eyes off of her.  For half an hour-- and after that, he believed everything we told him about DD and food allergy sensitivity.

He has agreed with our action plan over the years-- by and large.  He has also concurred with the same idea that YKW expressed earlier-- that as parents, we know things about DD and her reaction history that no outsider ever will, and we can judge nuance that others can't.  One of the major reasons why DD hasn't gone into a school setting is that those nuances are frequently all that we have to work with prior to crisis.  She definitely anaphylaxes rapidly-- terrifyingly so-- and if we have difficulty determining when that threshold has been crossed, what hope does anyone else have??

One major problem here is that you can't treat what you don't KNOW is a major exposure.  In this instance?  I personally know of no fewer than 6 or 7 people over the years who have done exactly the same thing (with a variety of allergens) and completely gotten away with it--that is, a bite, not swallowed, followed by COPIOUS amounts of rinsing and observation.   I've seen it happen (with shellfish, at a conference, with unmarked crab dip).

I have to ask myself what we would have done.  The truth is that I'm not sure.  I just can't imagine DD not reacting instantly
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: twinturbo on August 01, 2013, 11:39:19 AM
What he is saying isn't out there, though. Other allergists do say it. And it's interesting. Someone (TT?) posted something very similar before Natalie's death about recommendations for administering Epi in a medical setting are not necessarily what's most appropriate for the field.

Mac may be referring to what I wrote in reply to ajas' thread. Here's what I wrote there.

Having had the advantage(?) of seeing the allergist decide when to use epinephrine on DS2 in office during an oral challenge for anaphylaxis he went by the book. I've stopped asking when to use epinephrine in the field because it's going to be me there and not him or her. Me with no monitors to let me know what's happening internally. Me with no medical training or medical staff or adjunctive therapies to epinephrine to back me up.

In light of the topic I'll explain how I got there and from whom. It was after our fifth (?) ER run for both kids total. NIAID had just published its guide for best pratices in anaphylaxis management that unmistakenly named epinephrine as the first line in treatment with all others as adjunctive. Considering the go around I've had various EMS personnel, resident doctors in ERs or other medical persons with wildly conflicting ideas on what constitutes the use of epinephrine, I asked a clarification on NIAID's position amidst the conflict.

Between that National Jewish allergist and our own ped who was very down to earth, the one congruence was: the lowest common denominator for the general public out in the field is to use epinephrine. Adjunctive therapies are to be used by medical professionals in a hospital setting... that the kids need to be in a place with "monitors and doctors and stuff". In the hospital setting I may see all the adjunctive treatments used differently than epinephrine but my threshold as a mom without "monitors and doctors" is lower therefore I'm to use it with lower criteria in the field and that it's my call. Final say on the matter was when in doubt just epi then 911 given our history.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: my3guys on August 02, 2013, 10:44:40 AM
twinturbo, that makes a boatload of sense to me, thank you for your post!  I don't know why I struggle with when to epi so much...I'm usually a pretty decisive person. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Macabre on August 18, 2013, 12:14:34 PM
Looking at DS' Middle School 504, I was happy to see this (the IHCP was written into the 504 plan.  This was a great idea considering what the ES nurse had DS do after administering Epi during a reaction--had him walk upstairs to get his coat.  ??? )

If ingestion is suspected OR there is throat tightness OR there are two or more symptoms involving any of the body systems above, give EpiPen IMMEDIATELY. Visible hives and swelling are not necessary to administer the EpiPen.

Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: LinksEtc on August 22, 2013, 09:25:36 AM
"Lessons From a Teen Food Allergy Tragedy"
http://allergicliving.com/index.php/2013/08/22/lessons-from-a-teen-food-allergy-tragedy/?page=1
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: CMdeux on August 22, 2013, 09:40:55 AM
That's a GREAT pair of interviews.  Thank you very much for posting that, Links.   :heart:

The photos of her with her family were heartbreaking.   :'(
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Macabre on August 22, 2013, 10:35:49 AM
Wow. It might also be good to have that in a thread by itself so we can easily find, though Rayleigh conversation about when to administer Epi would make sense here. I wish we could tag threads--would help with SEO as well.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: LinksEtc on August 22, 2013, 10:49:52 AM
Do we have a general thread about when to administer epi?

We could link to the action plan thread, this article, the grading cart, etc ....

Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: maeve on August 22, 2013, 01:15:39 PM
I loved that article. I'm so glad Dr. Wood is our allergist.  He truly has a way of explaining things quite concisely.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: candyguru on August 22, 2013, 09:11:36 PM
Great article. 

We gave the epi pen jr only once, for our daughter's reaction to lentils due to her feeling a weak and tired and stomach ache (this reaction seemed much different to her wheat reactions).  Upon arrival at the hospital, she was given a second epi pen jr. Lentil reactions are scary as I'd rank lentils just as scary as peanuts... I guess it is a legume, related to peanuts in a way so be very careful with lentils, split peas, etc.  They also hooked her up to an IV that gave her steroids.  The lentil reactions also did not have many hives ...

Her wheat reactions were always hive only reactions and we didn't give the epi-pen jr (nor did the hospital). 

She never had a reaction to peanuts, nuts, sesame, eggs.. only the skin test was positive.

Reading the article makes me even more likely to use the epi-pen jr now, especially if she had an exposure to peanuts, tree nuts, legumes.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Macabre on August 23, 2013, 08:57:17 AM
Erik so you are avoiding peanuts, eggs, sesame and tn bases in skin tests alone?  They have a high rate of false positives.  I would also have the ImmunoCAP test run for those to see if you also see positives there. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: candyguru on August 23, 2013, 03:49:39 PM
Erik so you are avoiding peanuts, eggs, sesame and tn bases in skin tests alone?  They have a high rate of false positives.  I would also have the ImmunoCAP test run for those to see if you also see positives there.

Hi Macabre,

Yes, we are avoiding peanuts, tree nuts, and sesame based on skin tests only. I think that's a good idea that we do additional testing.. She just turned 6 so she is due for an ImmunoCap test. Her next allergist appointment is this fall so we'll talk to the allergist about it.  Thanks :-)

As for eggs, we had been avoiding it due to the skin test. I had totally forgotten about her exposure to eggs when someone shot raw eggs into our car earlier this summer and even though she didn't eat the eggs or hit directly, the aerosol / airborne egg mist caused major hives on her face and major swelling of her eyes.

I would love if the peanut skin test was false.. Though after seeing her severe lentil reactions and the consistency of her positive peanut skin test results each year, I am no it holding much hope she is not allergic to peanuts.

Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: lakeswimr on August 23, 2013, 05:13:04 PM
There are studies that found 86% and higher of kids diagnosed only by test results are not actually allergic.  I would want a food challenge for at least sesame since it is such a PITA to avoid.  My son can eat lentils and beans but is allergic to peanuts.  not sure the % of kids who are allergic to lentils who are also allergic to peanuts but if it is 50% of less I'd want to challenge that, too.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: candyguru on August 23, 2013, 08:26:16 PM
There are studies that found 86% and higher of kids diagnosed only by test results are not actually allergic.  I would want a food challenge for at least sesame since it is such a PITA to avoid.  My son can eat lentils and beans but is allergic to peanuts.  not sure the % of kids who are allergic to lentils who are also allergic to peanuts but if it is 50% of less I'd want to challenge that, too.

A food challenge is fine for some foods, but I can't imagine ever doing one for peanuts.  I am severely allergic to peanuts myself and react to airborne exposure (peanut dust) so would never want to do a food challenge with peanuts for my kids due to the potential severe reaction that may follow. 

It may be 86% inaccurate, but the positive skin test to eggs proved to be very accurate after she was exposed this summer and had a major reaction, so it seems my kids may be the exception with skin testing and actually have accurate results...  a food challenge is something I am hesitant to do after having been to the emergency room 4 times with my 6 yr old and twice with my 3 yr old.... just want to stay away from hospitals as much as we can these days.

My kids are very allergy prone.. my 6 yr old is currently having ragweed pollen allergy and is taking 2.5 ml to 5 ml of liquid cetirizine daily (Costco brand).
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: CMdeux on August 23, 2013, 09:19:37 PM
Honestly-- if you are one of the unfortunate 5% with seeming cross-reactivity/panallergen reactivity to legumes, it's probably better to just let it go.

 :heart:  Lentil, lupine, and peanut allergies are VERY closely linked.  (Can't remember the source on that one, but it was a European journal.)

The only other grouping that I know of like that is in mammalian milks, or the cashew-pistachio-mango cluster.

Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: lakeswimr on August 24, 2013, 08:00:05 AM
I can understand being hesitant.  Our allergist wants us to challenge all nuts and I'm dragging my feet.  But I know that people can have severe reactions to any food.  I'm somehow now scared to challenge other foods but 'nuts' makes it feel scary to me.

I don't know much about cross reactivity of peanuts with lentils so I can't say what I would do in your situation.

My child was having mystery reactions and in the process of tracking down the cause he tested hugely (and thankfully falsely) positive to a few things.  And all his other skin testing seems accurate, so I think that kids who test accurately to some foods can still have false positives.  Have you ever done a food challenge?  I thought they were super scary until we did some.  Other than for something peanut/nut-like I don't feel scared of them now. 

I know people who have kids who are MFA and super sensitive and react to ultra trace amounts and who feel they are airborne and who went to get tested at National Jewish and were found not allergic to tons of foods that had been diagnosed by a large panel test done by a non-allergist.  They were diagnosed to something like 50 foods when they were only allergic to a fraction of those foods. 

I understand what you are saying, though.  I would probably feel the same. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: hk on August 24, 2013, 11:54:08 AM
There are studies that found 86% and higher of kids diagnosed only by test results are not actually allergic.  I would want a food challenge for at least sesame since it is such a PITA to avoid.  My son can eat lentils and beans but is allergic to peanuts.  not sure the % of kids who are allergic to lentils who are also allergic to peanuts but if it is 50% of less I'd want to challenge that, too.

Sesame is the only thing we avoid due to test results only.  Allergist won't do a challenge because her RAST for it is over 7.  He is says sesame is such a potent allergen and won't risk it.  We don't have many great allergists on the west coast, but I will take her to national Jewish in CO if she will ever agree to a challenge.  Sesame is the one that impacts our life the most.  That said, she always hated the smell of it and refused to eat anything with sesame so she could very well be truly allergic to it.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: SilverLining on August 25, 2013, 02:28:14 PM
There are studies that found 86% and higher of kids diagnosed only by test results are not actually allergic.  I would want a food challenge for at least sesame since it is such a PITA to avoid.  My son can eat lentils and beans but is allergic to peanuts.  not sure the % of kids who are allergic to lentils who are also allergic to peanuts but if it is 50% of less I'd want to challenge that, too.

Sesame is the only thing we avoid due to test results only.  Allergist won't do a challenge because her RAST for it is over 7.  He is says sesame is such a potent allergen and won't risk it.  We don't have many great allergists on the west coast, but I will take her to national Jewish in CO if she will ever agree to a challenge.  Sesame is the one that impacts our life the most.  That said, she always hated the smell of it and refused to eat anything with sesame so she could very well be truly allergic to it.

I'm one of those who actually liked the foods I'm allergic to.  But I truly believe you should trust your child's instincts.  She hates the smell and refuses to eat it TO ME that is a bigger sign of an allergy then a spt.  (That's my opinion based on seeing it with so many other people.  I have no links to prove it.) how many people even know what a sesame seed smells like?  I think it's a minor reaction.  (Again, just my own opinion.)
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: maeve on August 25, 2013, 05:59:47 PM
Erik so you are avoiding peanuts, eggs, sesame and tn bases in skin tests alone?  They have a high rate of false positives.  I would also have the ImmunoCAP test run for those to see if you also see positives there. 

We were in the same situation as candyguru. Sort of, DD was SPT after a reaction to egg, so we knew that one would be positive. From SPT testing, DD turned out to really have only two false positives, sesame and soy.  Soy was cross-reactivity in the testing because her peanut levels were so high. I don't think she was ever allergic to sesame, and she passed a food challenge at 8 to sesame.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: SilverLining on August 29, 2013, 05:41:58 AM
Interview with Natalie's parents.

http://m.kcra.com/news/parents-of-girl-who-died-of-peanut-allergy-reaction-speak-out/-/17404292/21686610/-/wl8hmwz/-/index.html

I didn't know she had a twin.  That must be so devastating.  It's always hard to lose a sibling, but a twin is usually so much closer.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: my3guys on August 29, 2013, 07:52:10 AM
Ok that was a tear jerker.  I'm in awe of the Giorgis' composure and I so appreciate what they're trying to do. One of my twins has MFA, the other doesn't. My heart breaks for the twin left behind.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: CMdeux on August 29, 2013, 08:21:01 AM
Indeed.  As I suspected, the family indicates that they really did do everything that MOST of us would.  They even knew enough to limit her activity and observe her closely in spite of a lack of symptoms. 

The comments section, however, just boggles my mind.

 How can ANYONE possibly respond to that with "peanut allergies are mostly psychosomatic though"??  <---  :insane:

Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: becca on August 29, 2013, 08:39:09 AM
 :'(
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: twinturbo on August 29, 2013, 11:14:28 AM
I had to seal my mouth shut yesterday when the allergist kept insisting there's no way a reaction will be missed and that there's going to be plenty of warning and time to use an EpiPen. Strange thing was I was only asking for an EAP and not this incident.

 :coffee: Me grammar not so good. Ugh.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: ajasfolks2 on August 29, 2013, 01:15:38 PM
May just be a different link to same interview, but wanted to tuck this in here:

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2013/08/28/teens-parents-hope-peanut-allergy-death-brings-awareness/

Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: ajasfolks2 on August 29, 2013, 01:33:41 PM
Link to podcast  -- radio show in Sac area that friends and family have mentioned to me. . .


Link is embedded in this blog post (couldn't find just the link itself that would work):


http://www.gratefulfoodie.com/parents-of-teen-lost-to-peanut-death-speak-out/

Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: twinturbo on August 31, 2013, 06:38:32 PM
"Lessons From a Teen Food Allergy Tragedy"
[url]http://allergicliving.com/index.php/2013/08/22/lessons-from-a-teen-food-allergy-tragedy/?page=1[/url]


After finally reading this in whole it leaves me in an incredibly uncomfortable grey area on "minor" reactions. The difference of opinion between Canadian and American doctors was quite stark.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: CMdeux on August 31, 2013, 06:50:57 PM
Seems to me, also, that anyone that has such a low threshold that they have reacted severely to environmental/occult exposure (probably inhalation or possibly hand-to-mucous membrane exposure) is also living life in a grey area the size of the Grand Canyon.

"Ingestion" is always a possibility.  Everywhere, all the time.

If I think about that too hard, it terrifies me.  But there is no way around it; every reaction could be "the big one" and I don't need to have a known source of ANY exposure/ingestion to pin it on.

That, too, changes management decisions.   :-[  I sure wish it were easier.

Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: twinturbo on August 31, 2013, 07:16:12 PM
I would have thought there more similar opinion on use of epinephrine amongst American and Canadian allergists. One of the sessions at the upcoming APCAACI conference is anaphylaxis management in China, IIRC. DH and I are discussing which plenaries (sp? I don't even know what it really is w/o googling) and symposiums to attend for the three days, I'm curious to see if they toe the party line for USA sources, Canadian, UK, other, their own.

For anyone out there wondering why attend a conference so far away it's about 3 km from where our family lives he was going there anyhow.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: LinksEtc on September 02, 2013, 06:48:35 PM
Quote
When to administer epinephrine to a child having a potential anaphylactic episode in school

http://www.aaaai.org/ask-the-expert/when-administer-epinephrine.aspx
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: my3guys on September 03, 2013, 03:54:02 PM
Thank you LinksEtc, I found your link very helpful.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Macabre on September 03, 2013, 05:19:34 PM
Oh Links--thanks!!
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: LinksEtc on September 14, 2013, 08:16:00 AM
You're welcome my3guys & Macabre.

I stumbled across this related one when searching another topic ...

http://www.aaaai.org/ask-the-expert/when-epinephrine-injection.aspx

Quote
Many practitioners in our area instruct patients that if there are no symptoms, the patient should receive diphenhydramine and be monitored closely. However, a teenager died in our area recently after eating a peanut, and she initially had no symptoms


----

Quote
There is no “official recommendation” regarding the issue you present


Quote
Personally, if the situation occurs in the school, I usually will suggest administration of epinephrine immediately, regardless of whether or not any manifestations are present.


Quote
this is a philosophical decision and varies amongst allergists


---------------

Any other info I come across, I will probably just start a new thread ... I feel so bad for the family and don't want to keep raising this one.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Macabre on September 14, 2013, 08:45:31 AM
I've wondered about pulling out the most recent stuff into a new thread. Or even the initial blog that we talked about and all those comments specific to doctor recs about administering epinephrine.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: LinksEtc on September 14, 2013, 09:52:37 AM
Whatever you all think is best is fine with me.
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: Macabre on May 05, 2014, 11:58:57 PM
http://www.sacbee.com/2014/04/18/6335644/family-of-girl-who-died-from-peanut.html

Family sues city after girl’s peanut-allergy death at Camp Sacramento
“Obviously it’s something we find no joy in pursuing,” Louis Giorgi said of the lawsuit, “but it is consistent with our approach to accomplish the goal to help raise awareness of people, to pay attention to this and know it can be fatal. We need to take simple steps to protect all of our children. There can never be another Natalie. And there should never be another Natalie. It can be prevented.”

Natalie Giorgi went into anaphylactic shock July 26 after eating a Rice Krispies Treat during a hula hoop contest on her family’s last night of a four-day vacation at the popular, city-owned Camp Sacramento facility near Lake Tahoe that has been visited by thousands of families since it opened in the 1930s.

According to the lawsuit, the snack contained peanut butter that had been mixed into a marshmallow filling “in such a way as to be visually undetectable” and also “difficult or impossible to determine that the treat contained peanut butter by taste.”

During an interview in the office of their attorney, Roger A. Dreyer, the Giorgis said that their daughter had been diagnosed with the peanut allergy at age 3 when she had a mild reaction to either hazelwood or macadamia nuts. They said that since the diagnosis, she never again displayed any symptoms of the allergy until the night she died.


Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: daisy madness on May 11, 2014, 08:43:15 PM
What do you all think about this lawsuit?  I guess because DS has several allergies, and therefore I would never just assume a food is safe by it's appearance, I'm not sure that I see the city's responsibility in this.  If other peanut containing foods were labeled and this particular one wasn't, I could see fault there.  Or perhaps they asked a staff member about the foods and were given erroneous information. 

I'm so sorry for this family's loss. I read about it when it happened.  All FA deaths are tragic, but Natalie's death is particularly terrifying because the family did everything right.  After learning of her death, if DS has a known ingestion of peanut, I may epi before symptoms. 

I know someone whose young son had an anaphylactic reaction recently.  It was his first reaction although they were aware of the allergy because he reacted to his mother's breast milk.  They called the doctor when the hives started and the symptoms progressed while they were on the phone.  The doctor said "do not give Benadryl.  It's associated with death."  When they went in for their follow-up a few days later, the doctor brought up Natalie's story. 

I hope my post isn't insensitive.  I don't mean it as a criticism of the family. 
Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: lakeswimr on May 12, 2014, 06:31:35 AM
I feel sick thinking about this.  It was a tragic event. 

I don't feel I can comment on their law suit. I don't know the details of what happened.  If the camp prepared that food that would be very different than if another family prepared that food.

I am surprised to read that she had not had any allergic symptoms since age three.  Many people in that situation get lax with things like xcontam and etc and think their child is not that sensitive.  I have many friends like that. I always hope they are right and that their child really isn't that sensitive but this shows that even in cases like that where a person doesn't get minor reactions they can still be extremely allergic.  :( 

Title: Re: Fatal Reaction
Post by: maeve on May 12, 2014, 09:15:18 AM
I'm so sorry for this family's loss. I read about it when it happened.  All FA deaths are tragic, but Natalie's death is particularly terrifying because the family did everything right.  After learning of her death, if DS has a known ingestion of peanut, I may epi before symptoms. 

I believe I read in one of the initial news reports that Natalie had inquired about whether there were peanuts in the treat.