Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Please spell spammer backwards:
Spell the answer to 6 + 7 =:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by eragon
 - March 06, 2016, 09:43:18 AM
For me the ones that fall through the treatments and develop allergy need a further study on them!

It is like the 'may contain' statements, traces will cause a reaction for some and not others, its all in that grey area, we need to understand why they fail with current treatments, and focus on them. 


All these cures and studies just add another jigsaw piece to an ever greater complicated puzzle. 
Posted by CMdeux
 - March 05, 2016, 02:12:37 PM
This is the LEAP early intervention study-- the hypothesis being that early introduction of peanuts into high risk infants' diets might be PREVENTATIVE relative to the development of peanut allergy.

Seems to be that the intervention group's rate of PA is lower-- so that much looks awfully promising.

http://www.newsweek.com/early-introduction-allergenic-foods-key-preventing-kids-allergies-433820

But it's not clear that an identical approach works for all FA prevention in highly atopic infants.  (Which I'd already have predicted, based upon our own experiences with DD).

Posted by eragon
 - March 05, 2016, 11:17:12 AM