Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 365 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Please spell spammer backwards:
Three blonde, blue-eyed siblings are named Suzy, Jack and Bill.  What color hair does the sister have?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Macabre
 - February 14, 2013, 03:12:33 PM
When I had Ana in December it was. Second dose.
Posted by SilverLining
 - February 14, 2013, 12:44:44 PM
but what shocked me is twice as many received it intravenously then those that received it intramuscularly.  even in hospital, isn't it given intramuscular for anaphylaxis.
Posted by Macabre
 - February 14, 2013, 12:35:42 PM
Yeah, it looks like it was from Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

I was shocked at how low that was but remembered BeingHuman mentioning how much less it is recommended to use the Epi in the UK.
Posted by SilverLining
 - February 14, 2013, 08:34:17 AM
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035778

Quote2114 severe anaphylaxis patients from 58 centres were included. 8% received adrenaline intravenously, 4% intramuscularly

8% received adrenaline intravenously?  Would that help at all?


ETA:  I think this article is about Germany, not US or Canada.