<snip> I'm just wondering, if they really think the kid is "on his/her own" anyway, if the 504 ACTUALLY adds value at the HS age, and realistically, it comes with some risks with respect to college applications. <snip>
I wouldn't disclose the allergy during the application process. It's not relevant to assessing whether the student is academically suited to the university. I would disclose the allergy once acceptance had been granted/all financial aid sorted out and the student decided to attend the school. In the same vein, I would not disclose the allergy during a job interview either. An interviewer is legally forbidden from asking about a disability, so why disclose a hidden disability that may not have a material impact on your ability to attend school/perform a job.
I've heard it's on some college applications. (and private HS / prep school applications too).
Not those which have been properly vetted by legal, I'm thinking.
UNLESS-- these are schools which do not fall under section 504 (that is, that section of ADA-- which is title II, I believe. ?? ( The educational portion).
The thing is, the OTHER sections don't apply to publically funded schools or to government services... but they DO apply to "places of public accommodation."
What that means is that it is
still illegal to discriminate on the basis of disability alone when the disabled applicant/customer is
otherwise capable. This is (according to DOJ) about policies, practices, and procedures. If application procedures are discriminatory-- and maybe if they just SEEM that way or collect information which COULD be used to discriminate-- then that is illegal.
Now, what is
not illegal is the question which asks "Are there any accommodations which you will need?" But that is quite a different question, and usually it's asked once you've passed an initial hurdle of some sort-- and would therefore NEED said accommodations in order to proceed (as to a job interview onsite, to attend a college, etc.).
The only reasons for denying those accommodations are: a) reasonableness (since this isn't under section 504, remember?), and b) fundamental nature of the program/activity. So you can't tell a pastry class at Cordon Bleu to go wheat-free, even if you need that accommodation... and you can't ask for a building remodel so that you can live in a particular historic dorm.
Legal offices associated with academia are
VERY serious about not exposing themselves to this kind of liability. Truly.
TT and I both know this to be true, and I think that Nameless can vouch for this one, too.
YOU decide how much to share and when. YKW's strategy is completely correct. If you aren't ASKING for an accommodation, you have nothing
to share.