I saw this today. I don't have time to try to learn more just now. I don't know about you, but I don't think I can find any peanut reaction funny in light of the recent death.
http://globalnews.ca/news/752469/what-the-critics-are-saying-the-smurfs-2/Also not filled with blue cheer was Claudia Puig of USA Today.
“This insipid, and sometimes awkward, blend of animation, computer generation and live action wastes a ton of talent and lacks a true sense of whimsy,” she wrote. “Feeble efforts are made to keep adult viewers entertained, but jokes and asides fall flat. And whose idea was it to milk a child’s allergic reaction to peanuts for laughs?”
http://www.mlive.com/movies/index.ssf/2013/07/review_the_smurfs_2_brings_bac.htmlThrown in is a peanut-allergy gag that does not follow through to its inevitable near-death conclusion, numerous instances where Gargamel is the object of excruciatingly painful slapstick and lines such as “Get a shroom!” It’s surely enough to justify employing the five screenwriters who took a whack at this thing. The film is also an unwieldy 105 minutes long, stretching the original’s run time by 20 minutes, but the scene in which the Smurfs toot in the bathtub just absolutely could not be left on the cutting-room floor. I cannot recommend the movie for anyone over the age of seven, or those unfamiliar with the ingestion of hallucinogenics.